IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v35y2001i7p577-599.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers

Author

Listed:
  • Golob, Thomas F.
  • Regan, Amelia C.

Abstract

To better understand how road congestion adversely affects trucking operations, we surveyed approximately 1200 managers of all types of trucking companies operating in California. More than 80% of these managers consider traffic congestion on freeways and surface streets to be either a "somewhat serious" or "critically serious" problem for their business. A structural equations model (SEM) is estimated on these data to determine how five aspects of the congestion problem differ across sectors of the trucking industry. The five aspects were slow average speeds, unreliable travel times, increased driver frustration and morale, higher fuel and maintenance costs, and higher costs of accidents and insurance. The model also simultaneously estimates how these five aspects combine to predict the perceived overall magnitude of the problem. Overall, congestion is perceived to be a more serious problem by managers of trucking companies engaged in intermodal operations, particularly private and for-hire trucking companies serving airports and private companies serving rail terminals. Companies specializing in refrigerated transport also perceive congestion to be a more serious overall problem, as do private companies engaged in LTL operations. The most problematic aspect of congestion is unreliable travel times, followed by driver frustration and morale, then by slow average speeds. Unreliable travel times are a significantly more serious problem for intermodal air operations. Driver frustration and morale attributable to congestion is perceived to be more of a problem by managers of long-haul carriers and tanker operations. Slow average speeds are also more of a concern for airport and refrigerated operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2001. "Impacts of highway congestion on freight operations: perceptions of trucking industry managers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 577-599, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:35:y:2001:i:7:p:577-599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(00)00008-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 55-77, March.
    2. Ulf Olsson, 1979. "Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 44(4), pages 443-460, December.
    3. Hall, Randolph W. & Intihar, Chris, 1997. "Commercial Vehicle Operations: Government Interfaces And Intelligent Transportation Systems," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt9p272488, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Ulf Olsson & Fritz Drasgow & Neil Dorans, 1982. "The polyserial correlation coefficient," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 47(3), pages 337-347, September.
    5. ,, 2000. "Problems And Solutions," Econometric Theory, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(2), pages 287-299, April.
    6. Hensher, David A. & Golob, Thomas F., 1999. "Searching for policy priorities in the formulation of a freight transport strategy: a canonical correlation analysis of freight industry attitudes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 241-267, December.
    7. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2000. "Trucking industry perceptions of congestion problems and potential solutions in maritime intermodal operations in California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 587-605, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rezwana Rafiq & Michael G. McNally, 2021. "A study of tour formation: pre-, during, and post-recession analysis," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2187-2233, October.
    2. Hernández, Salvador & Peeta, Srinivas & Kalafatas, George, 2011. "A less-than-truckload carrier collaboration planning problem under dynamic capacities," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 47(6), pages 933-946.
    3. Nicolas Rincon-Garcia & Ben J. Waterson & Tom J. Cherrett, 2018. "Requirements from vehicle routing software: perspectives from literature, developers and the freight industry," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 117-138, January.
    4. Dong Wei & Xiaoshu Cao & Miaomiao Wang, 2019. "What Determines the Psychological Well-Being during Commute in Xi’an: The Role of Built Environment, Travel Attitude, and Travel Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, March.
    5. de Abreu e Silva, João & Alho, André Romano, 2017. "Using Structural Equations Modeling to explore perceived urban freight deliveries parking issues," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 18-32.
    6. Portugal, Licinio da Silva & Morgado, Andréa Vaz & Júnior, Orlando Lima, 2011. "Location of cargo terminals in metropolitan areas of developing countries: the Brazilian case," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 900-910.
    7. Fabling, Richard & Grimes, Arthur & Sanderson, Lynda, 2013. "Any port in a storm: Impacts of new port infrastructure on exporter behaviour," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 33-47.
    8. Sjoerd van der Spoel & Chintan Amrit & Jos van Hillegersberg, 2017. "Predictive analytics for truck arrival time estimation: a field study at a European distribution centre," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(17), pages 5062-5078, September.
    9. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt95d8d0xk, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Regan, A C & Golob, Thomas F, 2000. "CVO Perspectives on the Usefulness of Various Sources of Traffic Information," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0439w6h1, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2002. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9q4232hz, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Golob, Thomas F., 2001. "Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt8pb2m1pk, University of California Transportation Center.
    13. Li, Zhigang & Chen, Yu, 2013. "Estimating the social return to transport infrastructure: A price-difference approach applied to a quasi-experiment," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 669-683.
    14. Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 1-25, January.
    15. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2003. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt74z234n4, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Cherry, Christopher R. & Adelakun, Adebola A., 2012. "Truck driver perceptions and preferences: Congestion and conflict, managed lanes, and tolls," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-9.
    18. Ruoqi Wang & Jiawei Li & Ruibin Bai, 2023. "Prediction and Analysis of Container Terminal Logistics Arrival Time Based on Simulation Interactive Modeling: A Case Study of Ningbo Port," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-23, July.
    19. Golob, Thomas F., 2011. "Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt2pn5j58n, University of California Transportation Center.
    20. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2001. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7wz0j3rm, University of California Transportation Center.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Regan, A C & Golob, Thomas F, 2000. "CVO Perspectives on the Usefulness of Various Sources of Traffic Information," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0439w6h1, University of California Transportation Center.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2001. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7wz0j3rm, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "The Perceived Usefulness of Different Sources of Traffic Information to Trucking Operations," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt95d8d0xk, University of California Transportation Center.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Reagan, Amelia C., 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A structural Multivariate Discrete Choice Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7kv5f17n, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2002. "Trucking Industry Adoption of Information Technology: A Structural Multivariate Probit Model," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt9w1988t7, University of California Transportation Center.
    6. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    7. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt37s3z2xd, University of California Transportation Center.
    8. Cherry, Christopher R. & Adelakun, Adebola A., 2012. "Truck driver perceptions and preferences: Congestion and conflict, managed lanes, and tolls," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3fq6x2sq, University of California Transportation Center.
    10. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 1999. "Impacts of Highway Congestion on Freight Operations: Perceptions of Trucking Industry Managers," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt3dt7s30j, University of California Transportation Center.
    11. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 1999. "Freight Industry Attitudes Towards Policies to Reduce Congestion," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt57r4d3fd, University of California Transportation Center.
    12. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2004. "Safety aspects of freeway weaving sections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 35-51, January.
    13. Mitchell, James & Weale, Martin R., 2007. "The rationality and reliability of expectations reported by British households: micro evidence from the British household panel survey," Discussion Paper Series 1: Economic Studies 2007,19, Deutsche Bundesbank.
    14. Golob, Thomas F. & Recker, Wilfred W. & Alvarez, Veronica M., 2003. "Safety Aspects of Freeway Weaving Sections," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1zr6p58h, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Florian Schuberth & Jörg Henseler & Theo K. Dijkstra, 2018. "Partial least squares path modeling using ordinal categorical indicators," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(1), pages 9-35, January.
    16. Sonja N Sax & P. Robinan Gentry & Cynthia Van Landingham & Harvey J. Clewell & Kenneth A. Mundt, 2020. "Extended Analysis and Evidence Integration of Chloroprene as a Human Carcinogen," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(2), pages 294-318, February.
    17. Sonal Seth & Qianmei Feng, 2020. "Assessment of port efficiency using stepwise selection and window analysis in data envelopment analysis," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(4), pages 536-561, December.
    18. Shaobo Jin & Fan Yang-Wallentin & Kenneth A. Bollen, 2021. "A unified model-implied instrumental variable approach for structural equation modeling with mixed variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 86(2), pages 564-594, June.
    19. Robert O'Brien & Pamela Homer, 1987. "Corrections for coarsely categorized measures: LISREL's polyserial and polychoric correlations," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 349-360, December.
    20. Phan, Mai-Ha & Kim, Kap Hwan, 2015. "Negotiating truck arrival times among trucking companies and a container terminal," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 132-144.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:35:y:2001:i:7:p:577-599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.