IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/ndjtrf/206874.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Maloni, Michael J.
  • Jackson, Eric C.

Abstract

Given recent concerns about North American port congestion, this paper examines stakeholder involvement in expanding port capacity to meet significant volume growth. North American container port authorities were surveyed to identify key capacity factors and subsequent participation requirements by stakeholders such as terminal operators, longshore labor, railroads, steamship lines, truckers, and government. The resulting analysis indicates port frustration with participation currently offered by all stakeholders, especially the federal government and railroads. Such results further validate the requirement for a multi-stakeholder approach to port capacity expansion and suggest the need for national freight policy and planning leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Maloni, Michael J. & Jackson, Eric C., 2007. "Stakeholder Contributions to Container Port Capacity: A Survey of Port Authorities," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 46(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:206874
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.206874
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/206874/files/971-1081-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.206874?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nishimura, Etsuko & Imai, Akio & Papadimitriou, Stratos, 2001. "Berth allocation planning in the public berth system by genetic algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 282-292, June.
    2. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, A C, 2003. "Traffic Congestion and Trucking Managers' Use of Automated Routing and Scheduling," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt74z234n4, University of California Transportation Center.
    3. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2000. "Freight industry attitudes towards policies to reduce congestion," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 55-77, March.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Traffic congestion and trucking managers' use of automated routing and scheduling," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 61-78, January.
    5. Ricardo J Sánchez & Jan Hoffmann & Alejandro Micco & Georgina V Pizzolitto & Martín Sgut & Gordon Wilmsmeier, 2003. "Port Efficiency and International Trade: Port Efficiency as a Determinant of Maritime Transport Costs," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(2), pages 199-218, June.
    6. Dong-Wook Song & Ki-Tae Yeo, 2004. "A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Ports Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 6(1), pages 34-52, March.
    7. Vis, Iris F. A. & de Koster, Rene, 2003. "Transshipment of containers at a container terminal: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 1-16, May.
    8. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2002. "The perceived usefulness of different sources of traffic information to trucking operations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 97-116, April.
    9. Talley Wayne K., 2004. "Wage Differentials of Intermodal Transportation Carriers and Ports: Deregulation Versus Regulation," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(2), pages 1-21, June.
    10. Turner, Hugh & Windle, Robert & Dresner, Martin, 2004. "North American containerport productivity: 1984-1997," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 339-356, July.
    11. Wayne K. Talley, 2002. "Dockworker Earnings, Containerisation, and Shipping Deregulation," Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, University of Bath, vol. 36(3), pages 447-467, September.
    12. Kim, Kap Hwan & Park, Young-Man, 2004. "A crane scheduling method for port container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(3), pages 752-768, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Branislav Dragović & Nam Kyu Park & Zoran Radmilović, 2006. "Ship-berth link performance evaluation: simulation and analytical approaches," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(3), pages 281-299, July.
    2. Faiq Matin & Gobind M. Herani & Usman Ali Warraich, 2012. "Factors Affecting Traffic Jam in Karachi and its Impact on Performance of Economy," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 5, pages 25-32, December.
    3. Bierwirth, Christian & Meisel, Frank, 2010. "A survey of berth allocation and quay crane scheduling problems in container terminals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 202(3), pages 615-627, May.
    4. Golob, Thomas F. & Regan, Amelia C., 2003. "Surveying and Modeling Trucking Industry Perceptions, Preferences and Behavior," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt1gw166zk, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Peoples, James & Talley, Wayne K. & Thanabordeekij, Pithoon, 2006. "Shipping Deregulation's Wage Effect on Low and High Wage Dockworkers," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 219-249, January.
    6. Lalla-Ruiz, Eduardo & Expósito-Izquierdo, Christopher & Melián-Batista, Belén & Moreno-Vega, J. Marcos, 2016. "A Set-Partitioning-based model for the Berth Allocation Problem under Time-Dependent Limitations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(3), pages 1001-1012.
    7. Vitor R. Caldeirinha & J. Augusto Felício, 2014. "The relationship between 'position-port', 'hard-port' and 'soft-port' characteristics and port performance: conceptual models," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(6), pages 528-559, November.
    8. Zhen, Lu & Lee, Loo Hay & Chew, Ek Peng, 2011. "A decision model for berth allocation under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 212(1), pages 54-68, July.
    9. Feng Li & Jiuh-Biing Sheu & Zi-You Gao, 2015. "Solving the Continuous Berth Allocation and Specific Quay Crane Assignment Problems with Quay Crane Coverage Range," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(4), pages 968-989, November.
    10. Bichou, Khalid, 2006. "Chapter 24 Review of Port Performance Approaches and a Supply Chain Framework to Port Performance Benchmarking," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 567-598, January.
    11. Lu Zhen & Ek Peng Chew & Loo Hay Lee, 2011. "An Integrated Model for Berth Template and Yard Template Planning in Transshipment Hubs," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(4), pages 483-504, November.
    12. Henry Lau & Ying Zhao, 2008. "Integrated scheduling of handling equipment at automated container terminals," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 373-394, March.
    13. Gharehgozli, A.H. & Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Sea Container Terminals," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-009-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Hansen, Pierre & Oguz, Ceyda & Mladenovic, Nenad, 2008. "Variable neighborhood search for minimum cost berth allocation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 191(3), pages 636-649, December.
    15. Pierre CARIOU & Gabriel FIGUEIREDO DE OLIVEIRA, 2015. "Les Déterminants De L'Efficience Portuaire : Une Analyse Des Ports À Conteneurs Méditerranéens," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 41, pages 83-99.
    16. Regan, Amelia C. & Golob, Thomas F., 2003. "Trucking Industry Demand for Urban Shared Use Freight Terminals," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt0v33g422, University of California Transportation Center.
    17. Debjit Roy & René De Koster & René Bekker, 2020. "Modeling and Design of Container Terminal Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 686-715, May.
    18. Chen, Lu & Bostel, Nathalie & Dejax, Pierre & Cai, Jianguo & Xi, Lifeng, 2007. "A tabu search algorithm for the integrated scheduling problem of container handling systems in a maritime terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(1), pages 40-58, August.
    19. Low, Joyce M.W. & Lam, Shao Wei & Tang, Loon Ching, 2009. "Assessment of hub status among Asian ports from a network perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 593-606, July.
    20. Gharehgozli, Amir & Zaerpour, Nima, 2018. "Stacking outbound barge containers in an automated deep-sea terminal," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(3), pages 977-995.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndjtrf:206874. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.