Adoption: a new Stata routine for estimating consistently population technological adoption parameters
In Agricultural Economics 37 (2007) 201â€“210, using a counterfactual outcomes framework, Diagne and Demont showed that observed sample technological adoption rate does not consistently estimate the population adoption rate even if the sample is random. Likewise, it is shown that a model of adoption with observed adoption outcome as a dependent variable and where exposure to the technology is not observed and controlled for cannot yield consistent estimates of the determinants of adoption. In this talk the author present a new user-written Stata command called adoption implemented by using Stata estimation commands internally to carry out the various estimations and by computing the correct standard errors for the Average Treatment Effect (ATE) parameter estimates; population mean potential adoption in the exposed subpopulation (ATE1), population mean potential adoption in the non-exposed subpopulation (ATE0, population mean joint exposure and adoption (JEA), population adoption gap (GAP) and population selection bias (PSB). The ATE adoption parameters are estimated using the semiparametric (i.e. inverse probability weighting) method or a parametric method that fits adoption outcome on independent variables using one of Stata parametric models such as Probit, Logit, glm, Ols, Poisson, Tobit, etc.
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Feder, Gershon & Just, Richard E & Zilberman, David, 1985. "Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey," Economic Development and Cultural Change, University of Chicago Press, vol. 33(2), pages 255-98, January.
- Besley, Timothy & Case, Anne, 1993. "Modeling Technology Adoption in Developing Countries," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 83(2), pages 396-402, May.
- Dimara, Efthalia & Skuras, Dimitris, 2003.
"Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process,"
Blackwell, vol. 28(3), pages 187-196, May.
- Dimara, Efthalia & Skuras, Dimitris, 2003. "Adoption of agricultural innovations as a two-stage partial observability process," Agricultural Economics of Agricultural Economists, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 28(3), May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:boc:scon12:17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.