IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bhw/wpaper/03-2024.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

DISE: A Dynamic Integrated Space Economy Model for Orbital Debris Mitigation Policy Evaluation

Author

Listed:
  • Aneli Bongers

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

  • Cesar Ortiz

    (Department of Economics, Thompson Rivers University)

  • Jose L. Torres

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

Abstract

This paper presents the Dynamic Integrated Space-Economy (DISE) model, which is designed to study the economic implications of alternative policies aimed at mitigating orbital debris. The DISE model combines a standard neoclassical growth model with a physical space model for orbital debris dynamics. The economic model categorizes capital assets into two types: Earth's capital and Space's capital (i.e., satellites). DISE is intended to calculate the cost of space debris and its impact on the global economy. The model is simulated for a 200-year period under different scenarios, including a clean space environment, laissez-faire, de-orbiting policy, debris-free launch systems, a combination of de-orbiting and debris-free launch vehicles, and collision avoidance.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneli Bongers & Cesar Ortiz & Jose L. Torres, 2024. "DISE: A Dynamic Integrated Space Economy Model for Orbital Debris Mitigation Policy Evaluation," Space Economics Working Papers 03-2024, Institute for Space Economics, revised Sep 2024.
    • Handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:03-2024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spaceeconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/SEWP-03-2024.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2024
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Moulin & Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps, 2020. "Taxing congestion of the space commons," Post-Print hal-04417722, HAL.
    2. Luisa Corrado & Stefano Grassi & Aldo Paolillo & Edgar Silgado-Gómez, 2023. "The macroeconomic spillovers from space activity," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120(43), pages 2221342120-, October.
    3. Akhil Rao & Mark Moretto & Marcus Holzinger & Daniel Kaffine & Brian Weeden, 2023. "OPUS: An Integrated Assessment Model for Satellites and Orbital Debris," Papers 2309.10252, arXiv.org.
    4. Rao, Akhil & Burgess, Matthew & Kaffine, Daniel, 2020. "Orbital-use fees could more than quadruple the value of the space industry," MPRA Paper 112708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Bernhard, Pierre & Deschamps, Marc & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1140-1157.
    6. Fankhauser, Samuel & S.J. Tol, Richard, 2005. "On climate change and economic growth," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(1), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Nodir Adilov & Peter Alexander & Brendan Cunningham, 2015. "An Economic Analysis of Earth Orbit Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(1), pages 81-98, January.
    8. Nordhaus, William D., 1993. "Rolling the 'DICE': an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 27-50, March.
    9. Maxwell Fleming & Ian Lange & Sayeh Shojaeinia & Martin Stuermer, 2023. "Mining in space could spur sustainable growth," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 120(43), pages 2221345120-, October.
    10. Simon Dietz & Nicholas Stern, 2015. "Endogenous Growth, Convexity of Damage and Climate Risk: How Nordhaus' Framework Supports Deep Cuts in Carbon Emissions," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 0(583), pages 574-620, March.
    11. In Chang Hwang, 2017. "A Recursive Method for Solving a Climate–Economy Model: Value Function Iterations with Logarithmic Approximations," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 50(1), pages 95-110, June.
    12. Adilov, Nodir & Alexander, Peter J. & Cunningham, Brendan M., 2018. "An economic “Kessler Syndrome”: A dynamic model of earth orbit debris," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 79-82.
    13. Akhil Rao & Francesca Letizia, 2022. "An integrated debris environment assessment model," Papers 2205.05205, arXiv.org.
    14. Mikhail Golosov & John Hassler & Per Krusell & Aleh Tsyvinski, 2014. "Optimal Taxes on Fossil Fuel in General Equilibrium," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 82(1), pages 41-88, January.
    15. Sébastien Rouillon, 2020. "A Physico-Economic Model of Low Earth Orbit Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 695-723, December.
    16. Zachary Grzelka & Jeffrey Wagner, 2019. "Managing Satellite Debris in Low-Earth Orbit: Incentivizing Ex Ante Satellite Quality and Ex Post Take-Back Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 319-336, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneli Bongers & Benedetto Molinari & Sebastien Rouillon & Jose L. Torres, 2024. "The foundations of the economics of the outer space: A premier overview," Space Economics Working Papers 01-2024, Institute for Space Economics, revised Aug 2024.
    2. Bongers, Anelí & Torres, José L., 2023. "Orbital debris and the market for satellites," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    3. Bernhard, Pierre & Deschamps, Marc & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1140-1157.
    4. Gregory Casey & Stephie Fried & Ethan Goode, 2023. "Projecting the Impact of Rising Temperatures: The Role of Macroeconomic Dynamics," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(3), pages 688-718, September.
    5. Richard S J Tol, 2018. "The Economic Impacts of Climate Change," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 12(1), pages 4-25.
    6. Adilov, Nodir & Alexander, Peter J. & Cunningham, Brendan M., 2023. "The economics of satellite deorbiting performance bonds," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Gerlagh, Reyer, 2022. "Climate, Technology, Family Size; on the Crossroad between Two Ultimate Externalities," Discussion Paper 2022-027, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Fangzhi Wang & Hua Liao & Richard S. J. Tol, 2023. "Baumol's Climate Disease," Papers 2312.00160, arXiv.org.
    9. Aneli Bongers & Benedetto Molinari & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Optimal satellite shielding and orbital debris," Space Economics Working Papers 05-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised May 2025.
    10. Hambel, Christoph & Kraft, Holger & Schwartz, Eduardo, 2021. "Optimal carbon abatement in a stochastic equilibrium model with climate change," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    11. Chang, Jun-Jie & Mi, Zhifu & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2023. "Temperature and GDP: A review of climate econometrics analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 383-392.
    12. Kalkuhl, Matthias & Wenz, Leonie, 2020. "The impact of climate conditions on economic production. Evidence from a global panel of regions," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    13. Gallic, Ewen & Vermandel, Gauthier, 2017. "Weather Shocks, Climate Change and Business Cycles," MPRA Paper 81230, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Michael Grubb & Rutger-Jan Lange & Nicolas Cerkez & Pablo Salas & Ida Sognnaes, 2020. "Interactions of time and technology as critical determinants of optimal climate change policy," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 20-083/VI, Tinbergen Institute, revised 29 Dec 2022.
    15. Peter von zur Muehlen, 2022. "Prices and Taxes in a Ramsey Climate Policy Model under Heterogeneous Beliefs and Ambiguity," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-56, October.
    16. Hiroaki Sakamoto & Masako Ikefuji & Jan R. Magnus, 2020. "Adaptation for Mitigation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 75(3), pages 457-484, March.
    17. Akhil Rao, 2024. "Close Encounters of the LEO Kind: Spillovers and Resilience in Partially-Automated Traffic Systems," Papers 2410.04599, arXiv.org.
    18. Julien GUYOT & Sébastien ROUILLON, 2021. "Designing satellites to cope with orbital debris," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-16, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    19. Tol, Richard S.J., 2024. "A meta-analysis of the total economic impact of climate change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    20. Richard S.J. Tol, 2021. "Estimates of the social cost of carbon have not changed over time," Working Paper Series 0821, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Outer space; Orbital debris; Satellites; Integrated Assessment Models; Mitigation policies.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • E22 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Investment; Capital; Intangible Capital; Capacity
    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:03-2024. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose L. Torres (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/females.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.