IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bhw/wpaper/07-2025.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Optimal Active Debris Removal Policy in the Long-run

Author

Listed:
  • Aneli Bongers

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

  • Jose L. Torres

    (Department of Economics, University of Malaga)

Abstract

This paper evaluates optimal active debris removal (ADR) policies for managing space pollution caused by orbital debris. ADR refers to ex post mitigation efforts that involve removing debris from orbit. We extend the DISE-2024 model, an integrated assessment model (IAM) of the global economy and space environment, by incorporating ex-post abatement cost functions for different types of orbital debris. The model determines optimal abatement expenditures and the optimal proportion of debris (derelict satellites, rocket bodies, and fragments) to be removed in order to maximize social welfare. Our findings indicate that the optimal removal rate for small debris fragments is higher than for larger objects such as derelict satellites and rocket bodies. The cost of implementing ADR policies increases over time as space activity expands. Importantly, optimal ADR policies help prevent unlimited accumulation of orbital debris, avoiding the risk of a Kessler syndrome.

Suggested Citation

  • Aneli Bongers & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Optimal Active Debris Removal Policy in the Long-run," Space Economics Working Papers 07-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised Jul 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:07-2025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://spaceeconomics.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/SEWP-07-2025.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2025
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hervé Moulin & Sylvain Béal & Marc Deschamps, 2020. "Taxing congestion of the space commons," Post-Print hal-04417722, HAL.
    2. Akhil Rao & Mark Moretto & Marcus Holzinger & Daniel Kaffine & Brian Weeden, 2023. "OPUS: An Integrated Assessment Model for Satellites and Orbital Debris," Papers 2309.10252, arXiv.org.
    3. Rao, Akhil & Burgess, Matthew & Kaffine, Daniel, 2020. "Orbital-use fees could more than quadruple the value of the space industry," MPRA Paper 112708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Nodir Adilov & Peter Alexander & Brendan Cunningham, 2015. "An Economic Analysis of Earth Orbit Pollution," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 60(1), pages 81-98, January.
    5. Aneli Bongers & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Optimal path for orbital debris," Space Economics Working Papers 06-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised Jun 2025.
    6. Nodir Adilov & Peter Alexander & Brendan Cunningham & Nikolas Albertson, 2022. "An analysis of launch cost reductions for low Earth orbit satellites," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 42(3), pages 1561-1574.
    7. Richard Klima & Daan Bloembergen & Rahul Savani & Karl Tuyls & Daniel Hennes & Dario Izzo, 2016. "Space Debris Removal: A Game Theoretic Analysis," Games, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Nordhaus, William D., 1993. "Rolling the 'DICE': an optimal transition path for controlling greenhouse gases," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(1), pages 27-50, March.
    9. Adilov, Nodir & Alexander, Peter J. & Cunningham, Brendan M., 2018. "An economic “Kessler Syndrome”: A dynamic model of earth orbit debris," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 79-82.
    10. Sébastien Rouillon, 2020. "A Physico-Economic Model of Low Earth Orbit Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 695-723, December.
    11. Zachary Grzelka & Jeffrey Wagner, 2019. "Managing Satellite Debris in Low-Earth Orbit: Incentivizing Ex Ante Satellite Quality and Ex Post Take-Back Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 319-336, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aneli Bongers & Cesar Ortiz & Jose L. Torres, 2024. "DISE: A Dynamic Integrated Space Economy Model for Orbital Debris Mitigation Policy Evaluation," Space Economics Working Papers 03-2024, Institute for Space Economics, revised Sep 2024.
    2. Anelí Bongers & César Ortiz & José L. Torres, 2025. "DISE: A Dynamic Integrated Space-Economy Model for Orbital Debris Mitigation Policy Evaluation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(8), pages 2125-2156, August.
    3. Aneli Bongers & Benedetto Molinari & Sebastien Rouillon & Jose L. Torres, 2024. "The foundations of the economics of the outer space: A premier overview," Space Economics Working Papers 01-2024, Institute for Space Economics, revised Aug 2024.
    4. Bongers, Anelí & Torres, José L., 2023. "Orbital debris and the market for satellites," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Bernhard, Pierre & Deschamps, Marc & Zaccour, Georges, 2023. "Large satellite constellations and space debris: Exploratory analysis of strategic management of the space commons," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 304(3), pages 1140-1157.
    6. Adilov, Nodir & Alexander, Peter J. & Cunningham, Brendan M., 2023. "The economics of satellite deorbiting performance bonds," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    7. Aneli Bongers & Benedetto Molinari & Jose L. Torres, 2025. "Optimal satellite shielding and orbital debris," Space Economics Working Papers 05-2025, Institute for Space Economics, revised May 2025.
    8. Akhil Rao, 2024. "Close Encounters of the LEO Kind: Spillovers and Resilience in Partially-Automated Traffic Systems," Papers 2410.04599, arXiv.org.
    9. Julien GUYOT & Sébastien ROUILLON, 2021. "Designing satellites to cope with orbital debris," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2021-16, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
    10. Sébastien Rouillon, 2020. "A Physico-Economic Model of Low Earth Orbit Management," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(4), pages 695-723, December.
    11. Zachary Grzelka & Jeffrey Wagner, 2019. "Managing Satellite Debris in Low-Earth Orbit: Incentivizing Ex Ante Satellite Quality and Ex Post Take-Back Programs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 319-336, September.
    12. Martin Stuermer & Maxwell Fleming & Ian Lange & Sayeh Shojaeinia, 2023. "Growth and Resources in Space: Pushing the Final Frontier?," Working Papers 2023-02, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    13. Akhil Rao & Francesca Letizia, 2022. "An integrated debris environment assessment model," Papers 2205.05205, arXiv.org.
    14. Jeffrey Wagner & Zachary Grzelka, 2024. "Constellation IP and environmental quality," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-9, December.
    15. Julien Guyot & Akhil Rao & Sebastien Rouillon, 2022. "The long-run economics of sustainable orbit use," Working Papers hal-03891292, HAL.
    16. Akhil Rao & Giacomo Rondina, 2025. "The Economics of Orbit Use: Open Access, External Costs, and Runaway Debris Growth," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 12(2), pages 353-388.
    17. Rao, Akhil & Burgess, Matthew & Kaffine, Daniel, 2020. "Orbital-use fees could more than quadruple the value of the space industry," MPRA Paper 112708, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Aditya Jain & Akhil Rao, 2022. "International cooperation and competition in orbit-use management," Papers 2205.03926, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2022.
    19. Johan Eyckmans & Michael Finus, 2006. "New roads to international environmental agreements: the case of global warming," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 7(4), pages 391-414, December.
    20. Senni, Chiara Colesanti & von Jagow, Adrian, 2023. "Water risks for hydroelectricity generation," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119256, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D62 - Microeconomics - - Welfare Economics - - - Externalities
    • E21 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Consumption; Saving; Wealth
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bhw:wpaper:07-2025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Jose L. Torres (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/females.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.