On the rule of K names
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Peleg,Bezalel, 2008.
"Game Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees,"
Cambridge Books,
Cambridge University Press, number 9780521074650, Enero-Abr.
- Peleg, Bezalel, 2002. "Game-theoretic analysis of voting in committees," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 8, pages 395-423, Elsevier.
- Steven J. Brams & Samuel Merrill, III, 1986.
"Binding Versus Final-Offer Arbitration: A Combination is Best,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(10), pages 1346-1355, October.
- Brams, Steven J. & Merrill, Samuel III, 1984. "Binding Versus Final-Offer Arbitration: A Combination is Best," Working Papers 84-07, C.V. Starr Center for Applied Economics, New York University.
- Barbera, Salvador & Sonnenschein, Hugo & Zhou, Lin, 1991.
"Voting by Committees,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 595-609, May.
- Salvador Barbera & Hugo Sonnenschein & Lin Zhou, 1990. "Voting by Committees," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 941, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
- Barbera, Salvador & Sonnenschein, Hugo & Zhou, Lin, 1991.
"Voting by Committees,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(3), pages 595-609, May.
- Barbera, S. & Sonnenschein, H., 1988. "Voting By Quota And Committee," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 95-88, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Murat R. Sertel & M. Remzi Sanver, 2004.
"Strong equilibrium outcomes of voting games ¶are the generalized Condorcet winners,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 22(2), pages 331-347, April.
- Murat R. Sertel & Remzi Sanver, 2001. "Strong Equilibrium Outcomes of Voting Games are the Generalized Condorcet Winners," Working Papers 0107, Department of Economics, Bilkent University.
- Gehrlein, William V., 1985. "The Condorcet criterion and committee selection," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 199-209, December.
- Barış Kaymak & M. Remzi Sanver, 2003. "Sets of alternatives as Condorcet winners," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 20(3), pages 477-494, June.
- Steven J. Brams & Samuel Merrill, III, 1983. "Equilibrium Strategies for Final-Offer Arbitration: There is no Median Convergence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(8), pages 927-941, August.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Barberà, Salvador & Coelho, Danilo, 2010.
"On the rule of k names,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 70(1), pages 44-61, September.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2004. "On the rule of K names," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 636.04, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC), revised 13 Mar 2007.
- Barberà, Salvador & Coelho, Danilo, 2017.
"Balancing the power to appoint officers,"
Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 189-203.
- Danilo Coelho & Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Balancing the Power to Appoint Officers," Working Papers 696, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2006. "How to choose a non-controversial list with k names," Working Papers 291, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2008.
"How to choose a non-controversial list with k names,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 31(1), pages 79-96, June.
- Salvador Barberà & Danilo Coelho, 2006. "How to choose a non-controversial list with k names," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 675.06, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Salvador Barberà & Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno, 2012.
"Group strategy-proof social choice functions with binary ranges and arbitrary domains: characterization results,"
International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 41(4), pages 791-808, November.
- Salvador Barberà & Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno, 2010. "Group strategy-proof social choice functions with binary ranges and arbitrary domains: characterization results," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 853.10, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Dolors Berga & Bernardo Moreno & Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Group Strategy-Proof Social Choice Functions with Binary Ranges and Arbitrary Domains: Characterization Results," Working Papers 448, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Salvador Barberà, 2010.
"Strategy-proof social choice,"
UFAE and IAE Working Papers
828.10, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Salvador BarberÃ, 2015. "Strategy-proof social choice," Working Papers 420, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Bora Erdamar & M. Sanver, 2009. "Choosers as extension axioms," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 67(4), pages 375-384, October.
- Berga, Dolors & Serizawa, Shigehiro, 2000.
"Maximal Domain for Strategy-Proof Rules with One Public Good,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 39-61, January.
- Berga, D & Serizawa, S, 1996. "Maximal Domain for Strategy-Proof Rules with one Public Good," UFAE and IAE Working Papers 353.96, Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC).
- Podinovski, Vladislav V., 2010. "Set choice problems with incomplete information about the preferences of the decision maker," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 371-379, November.
- Mihir Bhattacharya, 2019.
"Constitutionally consistent voting rules over single-peaked domains,"
Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 52(2), pages 225-246, February.
- Mihir Bhattacharya, 2019. "Constitutionally consistent voting rules over single-peaked domains," Post-Print hal-02510491, HAL.
- Dinko Dimitrov & Ruud Hendrickx & Peter Borm, 2004.
"Good and bad objects: the symmetric difference rule,"
Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 4(11), pages 1-7.
- Borm, P.E.M. & Dimitrov, D.A. & Hendrickx, R.L.P., 2004. "Good and bad objects : The symmetric difference rule," Other publications TiSEM ae319b57-4686-4002-867c-5, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Bock, Hans-Hermann & Day, William H. E. & McMorris, F. R., 1998. "Consensus rules for committee elections," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 219-232, May.
- Fatma Aslan & Hayrullah Dindar & Jean Lainé, 2022.
"When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?,"
Review of Economic Design, Springer;Society for Economic Design, vol. 26(3), pages 417-446, September.
- Fatma Aslan & Hayrullah Dindar & Jean Lainé, 2021. "Correction to: When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?," Post-Print hal-03851366, HAL.
- Fatma Aslan & Hayrullah Dindar & Jean Lainé, 2021. "When are committees of Condorcet winners Condorcet winning committees?," Post-Print hal-03335584, HAL.
- Bonifacio, Agustín G. & Massó, Jordi & Neme, Pablo, 2023.
"Preference restrictions for simple and strategy-proof rules: Local and weakly single-peaked domains,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
- Agustín Bonifacio & Jordi Massó & Pablo Neme, 2022. "Preference Restrictions for Simple and Strategy-Proof Rules: Local and Weakly Single-Peaked Domains," Working Papers 121, Red Nacional de Investigadores en Economía (RedNIE).
- Pablo Neme & AgustÃn Bonifacio & Jordi Massó, 2022. "Preference Restrictions for Simple and Strategy-Proof Rules: Local and Weakly Single-Peaked Domains," Working Papers 1324, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Barbera, S. & Bossert, W. & Pattanaik, P.K., 2001.
"Ranking Sets of Objects,"
Cahiers de recherche
2001-02, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
- BARBERA, Salvador & BOSSERT, Walter & PATTANAIK, Prasanta K., 2001. "Ranking Sets of Objects," Cahiers de recherche 2001-02, Universite de Montreal, Departement de sciences economiques.
- Samet, Dov & Schmeidler, David, 2003.
"Between liberalism and democracy,"
Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 110(2), pages 213-233, June.
- David Schmeidler, 1998. "Between Liberalism and Democracy," Working Papers 98-18, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
- David Schmeidler, 2000. "Between LIberalism and Democracy," Working Papers 00-08, Ohio State University, Department of Economics.
- Dov Samet & David Schmeidler, 1999. "Between Liberalism and Democracy," Game Theory and Information 9908001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Paolo Giovanni Piacquadio, 2017.
"A Fairness Justification of Utilitarianism,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 85, pages 1261-1276, July.
- Paolo Giovanni Piacquadio, 2016. "A Fairness Justification of Utilitarianism," CESifo Working Paper Series 5785, CESifo.
- Picot, Jérémy & Sen, Arunava, 2012. "An extreme point characterization of random strategy-proof social choice functions: The two alternative case," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 49-52.
- Lefgren, Lars J. & Stoddard, Olga B. & Stovall, John E., 2021.
"Rationalizing self-defeating behaviors: Theory and evidence,"
Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
- Lars J. Lefgren & Olga B. Stoddard & John E. Stovall, 2018. "Are Two Bads Better Than One? A Model of Sensory Limitations," NBER Working Papers 25060, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kentaro Hatsumi & Dolors Berga & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2014.
"A maximal domain for strategy-proof and no-vetoer rules in the multi-object choice model,"
International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(1), pages 153-168, February.
- Kentaro Hatsumi & Dolors Berga & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2011. "A maximal domain for strategy-proof and no-vetoer rules in the multi-object choice model," ISER Discussion Paper 0809r, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka, revised Feb 2013.
- Kentaro Hatsumi & Dolors Berga & Shigehiro Serizawa, 2011. "A maximal domain for strategy-proof and no-vetoer rules in the multi-object choice model," ISER Discussion Paper 0809, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bge:wpaper:264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bruno Guallar (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bargses.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.