IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bfi/wpaper/2026-49.html

Financial Sanctions and the Global Payments Network

Author

Listed:
  • Gregor Matvos

    (Northwestern University)

  • Brent Neiman

    (University of Chicago)

Abstract

Financial sanctions targeting banks are widely viewed as powerful tools of economic statecraft.This is particularly true for sanctions imposed by the United States, in part reflecting the central role of the U.S. dollar in global payments. Yet there is limited systematic evidence on how financial sanctions affect access to the global payments system. We fill this gap by combining data on the network of correspondent banking relationships—a system that facilitates cross-border payments by linking banks across currencies and countries—with U.S., EU, and UK sanctions lists since 2021,a period of rapid growth in the designation of financial institutions. Comparing sanctioned institu-tions to unsanctioned peers in the same country, we find that sanctions substantially reduce access to the global payments network by severing key correspondent relationships, particularly those that provide the most direct access to currencies such as the U.S. dollar. However, sanctions do not elim-inate connectivity: sanctioned institutions often retain indirect access by routing payments through longer and more fragile chains of intermediaries. Further, at the country level, sanctions induce a reconfiguration of payment networks. In countries where sanctions expanded sharply, such asBelarus, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, and Russia, unsanctioned banks developed or expanded alterna-tive correspondent relationships, especially in Chinese yuan. Outside of these heavily-sanctioned economies, on average, the decrease in dollar and increase in yuan correspondent shares are modest

Suggested Citation

  • Gregor Matvos & Brent Neiman, 2026. "Financial Sanctions and the Global Payments Network," Working Papers 2026-49, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:bfi:wpaper:2026-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://repec.bfi.uchicago.edu/RePEc/pdfs/BFI_WP_2026-49.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marc J. Melitz, 2003. "The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 71(6), pages 1695-1725, November.
    2. Christopher Clayton & Matteo Maggiori & Jesse Schreger, 2026. "A Framework for Geoeconomics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 94(1), pages 105-136, January.
    3. Dirk Jan Grolleman & David Jutrsa, 2017. "Understanding Correspondent Banking Trends: A Monitoring Framework," IMF Working Papers 2017/216, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Myles, Jamieson, 2025. "Elastic Infrastructure: A Historical Perspective on Credit in Global Correspondent Banking and the Cross-Border Payments System," Working Papers unige:186604, University of Geneva, Paul Bairoch Institute of Economic History.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chansik Yoon, 2026. "Growth in the Shaded Sun: The Role of International Development Finance and Corruption," Adelaide Economics Working Papers 2026-03 Classification-O4, Adelaide University, School of Economics.
    2. Elhanan Helpman, 2010. "Labor Market Frictions as a Source of Comparative Advantage, with Implications for Unemployment and Inequality," NBER Working Papers 15764, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Patricia Kotnik & Eva Hagsten, 2018. "ICT use as a determinant of export activity in manufacturing and service firms: Multi-country evidence," Zbornik radova Ekonomskog fakulteta u Rijeci/Proceedings of Rijeka Faculty of Economics, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Economics and Business, vol. 36(1), pages 103-128.
    4. Acar, Mustafa & Afyonoglu, Burcu & Kus, Savas & Vural, Bengisu, 2007. "Turkey’s Agricultural Integration with the EU: Quantifying the Implications," Conference papers 331657, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Chen, Natalie & Juvenal, Luciana, 2022. "Markups, quality, and trade costs," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    6. Joachim Wagner, 2012. "Exports, R&D and productivity: a test of the Bustos-model with German enterprise data," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 32(3), pages 1942-1948.
    7. Yuegang Song & Songlin Jin & Zhenhui Li, 2022. "Venture Capital and Chinese Firms’ Technological Innovation Capability: Effective Evaluation and Mechanism Verification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Benkovskis, Konstantins & Wörz, Julia, 2018. "What drives the market share changes? Price versus non-price factors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 9-29.
    9. Kalantzis, Fotios & Niczyporuk, Hanna, 2021. "Can European businesses achieve productivity gains from investments in energy efficiency?," EIB Working Papers 2021/07, European Investment Bank (EIB).
    10. Dmitri Kirpichev & Enrique Moral-Benito, 2018. "The costs of trade protectionism: evidence from Spanish firms and non-tariff measures," Working Papers 1814, Banco de España.
    11. Tovar, Jorge, 2012. "Consumers’ Welfare and Trade Liberalization: Evidence from the Car Industry in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 808-820.
    12. Ricardo A. Lopez, 2007. "Exports and Productivity – Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries," CAEPR Working Papers 2007-028, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    13. Wang, Xiaosong & Tian, Siyuan & Zhou, Yuding & Li, Le, 2025. "Import liberalization and pollution reduction: Firm-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-18.
    14. Wang, Xu & Zhang, Xiaobo & Xie, Zhuan & Huang, Yiping, 2016. "Roads to innovation: Firm-level evidence from China," IFPRI discussion papers 1542, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Dennis, Allen & Shepherd, Ben, 2007. "Trade costs, barriers to entry, and export diversification in developing countries," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4368, The World Bank.
    16. Sourafel Girma & Yundan Gong & Holger Görg & Zhihong Yu, 2009. "Can Production Subsidies Explain China's Export Performance? Evidence from Firm‐level Data," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 111(4), pages 863-891, December.
    17. Masayuki MORIKAWA, 2015. "Service Trade and Productivity: Firm-level evidence from Japan," Discussion papers 15030, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
    18. Masashige Hamano & Francesco Pappadà, 2023. "Exchange Rate Policy and Firm Heterogeneity," IMF Economic Review, Palgrave Macmillan;International Monetary Fund, vol. 71(3), pages 759-790, September.
    19. Stephen J. Redding & David E. Weinstein, 2017. "Aggregating from Micro to Macro Patterns of Trade," NBER Working Papers 24051, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Cheptea, Angela & Emlinger, Charlotte & Latouche, Karine, 2014. "Do exporting firms benefit from retail internationalization? Evidence from France," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 182706, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F3 - International Economics - - International Finance
    • F5 - International Economics - - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy
    • G2 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bfi:wpaper:2026-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Toni Shears The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Toni Shears to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mfichus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.