IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/bdi/opques/qef_945_25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The geography of innovation: patent insights into Europe's green and digital transitions

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Lotti

    (Bank of Italy)

  • Claudia Nobile

    (PSE, Collège de France)

Abstract

Innovation is a key driver of Europe's green and digital transitions, as well as of its global competitiveness. This report uses patent data from the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and the European Patent Office to assess where and how technological capabilities are evolving, with a focus on Italy's position in the European innovation landscape. The analysis reveals persistent cross-country and regional divides, but also signals a shifting global innovation frontier: China has rapidly emerged as a global leader in strategic technologies such as artificial intelligence and green innovation, overtaking the United States, the EU and Japan in international patent filings. This development highlights the need for Europe to reinforce its innovation leadership in high-value, globally competitive domains. Within Europe, Germany leads in both patent volume and quality, while France stands out in artificial intelligence (AI). Italy ranks fifth in patenting overall, with a strong industrial base and targeted specialization in green technologies, yet it grapples with marked regional imbalances and limited public sector involvement. AI patenting in Italy remains concentrated in the industrial North and is led by firms, whereas green innovation is more broadly distributed, offering potential for more inclusive growth. At the same time, the innovation process is becoming increasingly dominated by incumbent firms. The share of new and 'one-shot' patenting firms is declining, and the average age of first-time innovators is rising – pointing to structural barriers to entry and the growing complexity of frontier innovation. Stronger support for young, regionally dispersed innovators and complementary investments in adjacent technologies are essential to sustain and expand Italy's innovation capacity in the context of the Twin Transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Lotti & Claudia Nobile, 2025. "The geography of innovation: patent insights into Europe's green and digital transitions," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 945, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_945_25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bancaditalia.it/pubblicazioni/qef/2025-0945/QEF_945_25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ufuk Akcigit & Salomé Baslandze & Francesca Lotti, 2023. "Connecting to Power: Political Connections, Innovation, and Firm Dynamics," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 91(2), pages 529-564, March.
    2. Nicholas Bloom & Charles I. Jones & John Van Reenen & Michael Webb, 2020. "Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(4), pages 1104-1144, April.
    3. Flavio Calvino & Hélène Dernis & Lea Samek & Antonio Ughi, 2024. "A sectoral taxonomy of AI intensity," OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers 30, OECD Publishing.
    4. Josh Lerner & Amit Seru, 2017. "The Use and Misuse of Patent Data: Issues for Corporate Finance and Beyond," NBER Working Papers 24053, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Antonin Bergeaud & Arthur Guillouzouic & Emeric Henry & Clement Malgouyres, 2022. "From public labs to private firms: magnitude and channels of R&D spillovers," POID Working Papers 041, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    6. Ryan A. Decker & John Haltiwanger & Ron S. Jarmin & Javier Miranda, 2016. "Declining Business Dynamism: What We Know and the Way Forward," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 203-207, May.
    7. Dietmar Harhoff, 2016. "Patent Quality and Examination in Europe," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(5), pages 193-197, May.
    8. Emanuele Bacchiocchi & Fabio Montobbio, 2010. "International Knowledge Diffusion and Home‐bias Effect: Do USPTO and EPO Patent Citations Tell the Same Story?," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 112(3), pages 441-470, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Baslandze, Salomé & Argente, David & Hanley, Douglas & Moreira, Sara, 2020. "Patents to Products: Product Innovation and Firm Dynamics," CEPR Discussion Papers 14692, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Garcia-Macia, Daniel & Korosteleva, Julia, 2025. "Tracing productivity growth channels in the UK," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    3. Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2021. "Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 257-298, January.
    4. Cui, Chuantao & Li, Leona Shao-Zhi, 2023. "Trade policy uncertainty and new firm entry: Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Naudé, Wim & Nagler, Paula, 2021. "The Rise and Fall of German Innovation," IZA Discussion Papers 14154, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Barbara Annicchiarico & Valentina Antonaroli & Alessandra Pelloni, 2022. "Optimal factor taxation in a scale free model of vertical innovation," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 60(2), pages 794-830, April.
    7. Alexander S. Kritikos & Alexander Schiersch & Caroline Stiel, 2022. "The productivity shock in business services," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1273-1299, October.
    8. NINDL Elisabeth & NAPOLITANO Lorenzo & CONFRARIA Hugo & RENTOCCHINI Francesco & FAKO Peter & GAVIGAN James & TUEBKE Alexander, 2024. "The 2024 EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard," JRC Research Reports JRC140129, Joint Research Centre.
    9. Santiago Caicedo & Jeremy Pearce, 2024. "Need for Speed: Quality of Innovations and the Allocation of Inventors," Staff Reports 1127, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
    10. Wim Naudé, 2022. "From the entrepreneurial to the ossified economy," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(1), pages 105-131.
    11. Howell, Sabrina T. & Rathje, Jason & Van Reenen, John & Wong, Jun, 2021. "Opening up Military Innovation: Causal Effects of 'Bottom-up' Reforms to U.S. Defense Research," IZA Discussion Papers 14297, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Bart van Ark & Klaas de Vries & Dirk Pilat, 2024. "Are pro‐productivity policies fit for purpose?," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 92(2), pages 191-208, March.
    13. Howell, Sabrina T. & Rathje, Jason & Van Reenen, John & Wong, Jun, 2021. "Opening up military innovation: causal effects of reforms to US defense research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114430, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    14. John Fernald, 2018. "Is Slow Productivity and Output Growth in Advanced Economies the New Normal?," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 35, pages 138-148, Fall.
    15. Taalbi, Josef, 2019. "Innovation waves and technological transitions: Sweden, 1909-2016," Lund Papers in Economic History 196, Lund University, Department of Economic History.
    16. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Kiema, Ilkka & Maczulskij, Terhi, 2024. "Productivity and Green Transition in Finland," ETLA Reports 151, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    17. Frank R. Lichtenberg, 2019. "The long-run impact of new medical ideas on cancer survival and mortality," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(7), pages 722-740, October.
    18. Diegmann, André & Pohlan, Laura & Weber, Andrea, 2024. "Do Politicians Affect Firm Outcomes? Evidence from Connections to the German Federal Parliament," IZA Discussion Papers 17031, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Kuosmanen, Natalia & Valmari, Nelli, 2023. "Renewal of Companies Through Product Switching," ETLA Working Papers 104, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    20. Wang, Shanchao & Alston, Julian M. & Pardey, Philip G., 2023. "R&D Lags in Economic Models," Staff Papers 330085, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • R11 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdi:opques:qef_945_25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/bdigvit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.