IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/avg/wpaper/en17000.html

Distributive Impact of Green Taxes in Mexico

Author

Listed:
  • John R. Scott
  • Ricardo Massa
  • Ana Cecilia Parada

Abstract

Carbon pricing is one of the most effective tools available worldwide for the regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. There is extensive theoretical and empirical research on optimal pricing instruments, such as environmental taxes —carbon and energy taxes, in particular— and emissions trading systems. In Mexico, as in most countries globally, energy taxation, particularly through taxes on fuels, serves as the primary carbon pricing instrument. This study quantifies the size and the distributive effects of green taxes (and anti-green subsidies) in Mexico, principally focusing on excise taxes (IEPS, from its initials in Spanish) levied on coal and fuels, as well as subsidies for residential electricity consumption. We analyse the distributive effect of fuel taxes within Mexico's broader fiscal system, including the main tax and public expenditure instruments, spanning the 2014-2022 period. In terms of the effect on extreme poverty, consumable income (disposable income net of subsidies and indirect taxes) shifts from a reduction of 2.3 ppt (with respect to household market income) to an increase of 0.5 ppt between 2014 and 2020. In other words, the increase in indirect taxes implies that their impoverishing effect completely eliminates the poverty-reducing effect of all direct transfers for the extremely poor. As in many other countries, energy subsidies in Mexico or their equivalent in energy tax exemptions, have been motivated by considerations of equity. However, given Mexico’s high income inequality, broad energy subsidies are proven to be inefficient redistributive instruments, especially compared to targeted or even universal transfers.This paper is part of a research project supported by the Extension of the EU-AFD Research Facility on Inequalities.

Suggested Citation

  • John R. Scott & Ricardo Massa & Ana Cecilia Parada, 2024. "Distributive Impact of Green Taxes in Mexico," Working Paper d237a40f-8742-49a5-b30a-0, Agence française de développement.
  • Handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en17000
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.afd.fr/sites/afd/files/2024-07-03-58-03/Distributive-impact-of-green-taxes-in-mexico.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melanie Marten & Kurt van Dender, 2019. "The use of revenues from carbon pricing," OECD Taxation Working Papers 43, OECD Publishing.
    2. Sen, Suphi & Vollebergh, Herman, 2018. "The effectiveness of taxing the carbon content of energy consumption," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 74-99.
    3. Ali Enami & Ugo Gentilini & Patricio Larroulet & Nora Lustig & Emma Monsalve & Siyu Quan & Jamele Rigolini, 2023. "Universal Basic Income Programs: How Much Would Taxes Need to Rise? Evidence for Brazil, Chile, India, Russia, and South Africa," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(9), pages 1443-1463, September.
    4. Lucas W. Davis & Lutz Kilian, 2011. "Estimating the effect of a gasoline tax on carbon emissions," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 1187-1214, November.
    5. Kangni Kpodar & David Coady & Moataz El-Said & Robert Gillingham & Paulo Medas & David Newhouse, 2006. "The Magnitude and Distribution of Fuel Subsidies: Evidence from Bolivia, Ghana, Jordan, Mali, and Sri Lanka," Post-Print hal-00130176, HAL.
    6. John Scott & Enrique de la Rosa & Rodrigo Aranda, 2017. "Inequality and fiscal redistribution in Mexico: 1992–2015," WIDER Working Paper Series 194, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    7. John Scott & Enrique de la Rosa & Rodrigo Aranda, 2017. "Inequality and fiscal redistribution in Mexico: 1992-2015," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2017-194, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    8. John Scott & Enrique de la Rosa & Rodrigo Aranda, 2017. "Inequality and Fiscal Redistribution in Mexico," Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series 65, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rivas, Aldair & Chávez, Emmanuel & Rojas, Irvin & Zaragoza, Aaron, 2025. "The legal and real incidence of VAT Reforms in Mexico: Distributional effects and impacts on poverty," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    2. Marz, Waldemar & Pfeiffer, Johannes, 2020. "Petrodollar recycling, oil monopoly, and carbon taxes," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    3. Rafaty, Ryan & Dolphin, Geoffroy & Pretis, Felix, 2025. "Carbon pricing and the elasticity of CO2 emissions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    4. Marz, Waldemar & Pfeiffer, Johannes, 2023. "Fossil resource market power and capital markets," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    5. Frederic Lambert & Hyunmin Park, 2019. "Income Inequality and Government Transfers in Mexico," IMF Working Papers 2019/148, International Monetary Fund.
    6. Alberto Gago & Xavier Labandeira & José M. Labeaga & Xiral López Otero, 2021. "Transport Taxes and Decarbonization in Spain: Distributional Impacts and Compensation," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 238(3), pages 101-136, September.
    7. Kasper Vrolijk & Misato Sato, 2023. "Quasi-Experimental Evidence on Carbon Pricing," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 38(2), pages 213-248.
    8. Vrolijk, Kasper & Sato, Misato, 2023. "Quasi-experimental evidence on carbon pricing," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 118404, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Storrøsten, Halvor Briseid, 2024. "U.S. light tight oil supply flexibility - A multivariate dynamic model for production and rig activity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Plante, Michael, 2014. "The long-run macroeconomic impacts of fuel subsidies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 129-143.
    11. repec:rnp:ppaper:r90221 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. John Coglianese & Lucas W. Davis & Lutz Kilian & James H. Stock, 2017. "Anticipation, Tax Avoidance, and the Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(1), pages 1-15, January.
    13. M. Adam & O. Bonnet & E. Fize & T. Loisel & M. Rault & L. Wilner, 2023. "How does fuel demand respond to price changes? Quasi-experimental evidence based on high-frequency data," Documents de Travail de l'Insee - INSEE Working Papers 2023-17, Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
    14. Abdelkrim Araar & Paolo Verme, 2017. "The Quest for Subsidies Reforms in the Middle East and North Africa Region," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 25783, April.
    15. Levin, Laurence & Lewis, Matthew S. & Wolak, Frank A., 2022. "Reference dependence in the demand for gasoline," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 561-578.
    16. Benjamin Jones & Michael Keen & Jon Strand, 2013. "Fiscal implications of climate change," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 20(1), pages 29-70, February.
    17. Li, Xiaoyu & Yao, Xilong, 2020. "Can energy supply-side and demand-side policies for energy saving and emission reduction be synergistic?--- A simulated study on China's coal capacity cut and carbon tax," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    18. Shanjun Li & Joshua Linn & Erich Muehlegger, 2014. "Gasoline Taxes and Consumer Behavior," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 6(4), pages 302-342, November.
    19. Nadezhda V. Ponomareva & Anna O. Zvereva & Ekaterina V. Golubtsova & Svetlana B. Ilyashenko, 2019. "Tax Incentives for use of Alternative Energy Sources in the Russian Federation," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 9(4), pages 144-148.
    20. Jin WANG, 2025. "Different Responses of European Economies to Carbon Tax: Insights from National CGE Models for Poland, Germany, France, and the UK," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 1, pages 5-19.
    21. Bento, Antonio M. & Hughes, Jonathan E. & Kaffine, Daniel, 2013. "Carpooling and driver responses to fuel price changes: Evidence from traffic flows in Los Angeles," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 41-56.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:avg:wpaper:en17000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AFD (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afdgvfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.