IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2509.03916.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regulation or Competition:Major-Minor Optimal Liquidation across Dark and Lit Pools

Author

Listed:
  • Thibaut Mastrolia
  • Hao Wang

Abstract

We study the optimal liquidation problem in both lit and dark pools for investors facing execution uncertainty in a continuous-time setting with market impact. First, we design an optimal make--take fee policy for a large investor liquidating her position across both pools, interacting with small investors who pay trading fees. We explicitly characterize the large investor's optimal liquidation strategies in both lit and dark pools using BSDEs under a compensation scheme proposed by an exchange to mitigate market impact in the lit venue. Second, we consider a purely competitive model with major--minor traders in the absence of regulation. We provide explicit solutions to the associated HJB--Fokker--Planck system. Finally, we illustrate our results through numerical experiments, comparing market impact under a regulated market with a strategic large investor to that in a purely competitive market with both small and large investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Thibaut Mastrolia & Hao Wang, 2025. "Regulation or Competition:Major-Minor Optimal Liquidation across Dark and Lit Pools," Papers 2509.03916, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.03916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2509.03916
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2509.03916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.