IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/fininn/v10y2024i1d10.1186_s40854-024-00613-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal liquidation using extended trading close for multiple trading days

Author

Listed:
  • Jianchang Zhu

    (Nanjing University)

  • Leilei Zhang

    (Georg-August-Universität)

  • Xuchu Sun

    (Nanjing University)

Abstract

The extended trading close (ETC) provides institutional investors an opportunity to trade at the closing price after the regular trading session (RTS) and disclosing the order imbalances to other market participants. ETCs exist in the Nasdaq, the SSE STAR, the SZSE ChiNext and the TWSE. To help a risk-averse institutional investor take advantage of the RTS and the ETC for liquidation, we develop a multistage dynamic programming model including the ETC, and derive recursive solutions for the multiple trading days scenario with closed-form solutions for the scenario with only two trading days. We also verify that the ETC is able to mitigate extreme price movements caused by fast liquidation, which is also a goal of the ETC set out by the SSE STAR and the SZSE ChiNext. Finally, we derive three results. First, an institutional investor can reduce execution costs after the introduction of the ETC. Second, a critical trading day exists, and to avoid prematurely revealing trading intentions, the investor should not trade in the ETC until such day. Third, even though the ETC orders submitted by the investor are unfilled, implementation of the ETC encourages the investor to change the liquidation strategy in the RTS, which reduces extreme price movements. In summary, the practical implications of this paper are that the investor should not trade during the ETC on the front few days to avoid prematurely revealing the investor’s trading intention by unfilled orders in the ETC and that introducing the ETC can reduce liquidation costs and extreme price movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianchang Zhu & Leilei Zhang & Xuchu Sun, 2024. "Optimal liquidation using extended trading close for multiple trading days," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 1-33, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:10:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-024-00613-7
    DOI: 10.1186/s40854-024-00613-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1186/s40854-024-00613-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1186/s40854-024-00613-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hautsch, Nikolaus & Huang, Ruihong, 2012. "The market impact of a limit order," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 501-522.
    2. Obizhaeva, Anna A. & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Optimal trading strategy and supply/demand dynamics," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-32.
    3. Peter Kratz & Torsten Schöneborn, 2015. "Portfolio Liquidation In Dark Pools In Continuous Time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 496-544, July.
    4. Brogaard, Jonathan & Carrion, Allen & Moyaert, Thibaut & Riordan, Ryan & Shkilko, Andriy & Sokolov, Konstantin, 2018. "High frequency trading and extreme price movements," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(2), pages 253-265.
    5. Alexander Schied & Torsten Schöneborn, 2009. "Risk aversion and the dynamics of optimal liquidation strategies in illiquid markets," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 181-204, April.
    6. Jonathan Brogaard & Terrence Hendershott & Ryan Riordan, 2019. "Price Discovery without Trading: Evidence from Limit Orders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1621-1658, August.
    7. Jim Gatheral, 2010. "No-dynamic-arbitrage and market impact," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(7), pages 749-759.
    8. Alexander Schied & Torsten Schoneborn & Michael Tehranchi, 2010. "Optimal Basket Liquidation for CARA Investors is Deterministic," Applied Mathematical Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 471-489.
    9. Gerry Tsoukalas & Jiang Wang & Kay Giesecke, 2019. "Dynamic Portfolio Execution," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 2015-2040, May.
    10. Peter Kratz & Torsten Schöneborn, 2018. "Optimal Liquidation And Adverse Selection In Dark Pools," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 177-210, January.
    11. Bertsimas, Dimitris & Lo, Andrew W., 1998. "Optimal control of execution costs," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 1(1), pages 1-50, April.
    12. Peter Kratz & Torsten Sch�neborn, 2014. "Optimal liquidation in dark pools," Quantitative Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(9), pages 1519-1539, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olivier Guéant, 2016. "The Financial Mathematics of Market Liquidity: From Optimal Execution to Market Making," Post-Print hal-01393136, HAL.
    2. Zhu, Jianchang & Sun, Xuchu & Li, Tangrong, 2024. "Execution uncertainty of dark pools and portfolio balance," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Olivier Guéant & Charles-Albert Lehalle, 2015. "General Intensity Shapes In Optimal Liquidation," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(3), pages 457-495, July.
    4. Sadoghi, Amirhossein & Vecer, Jan, 2022. "Optimal liquidation problem in illiquid markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 1050-1066.
    5. Ludovic Moreau & Johannes Muhle-Karbe & H. Mete Soner, 2014. "Trading with Small Price Impact," Papers 1402.5304, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2015.
    6. Olivier Gu'eant, 2012. "Optimal execution and block trade pricing: a general framework," Papers 1210.6372, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2014.
    7. Lokka, A. & Xu, Junwei, 2020. "Optimal liquidation trajectories for the Almgren-Chriss model," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 106977, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Ulrich Horst & Xiaonyu Xia, 2019. "Multi-dimensional optimal trade execution under stochastic resilience," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 889-923, October.
    9. Amirhossein Sadoghi & Jan Vecer, 2022. "Optimal liquidation problem in illiquid markets," Post-Print hal-03696768, HAL.
    10. Philippe Bergault & Fayc{c}al Drissi & Olivier Gu'eant, 2021. "Multi-asset optimal execution and statistical arbitrage strategies under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck dynamics," Papers 2103.13773, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2022.
    11. Aur'elien Alfonsi & Alexander Schied & Florian Klock, 2013. "Multivariate transient price impact and matrix-valued positive definite functions," Papers 1310.4471, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2015.
    12. Aurélien Alfonsi & Alexander Schied, 2010. "Optimal trade execution and absence of price manipulations in limit order book models," Post-Print hal-00397652, HAL.
    13. Chen, Yuanyuan & Gao, Xuefeng & Li, Duan, 2018. "Optimal order execution using hidden orders," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 89-116.
    14. Martin D. Gould & Mason A. Porter & Stacy Williams & Mark McDonald & Daniel J. Fenn & Sam D. Howison, 2010. "Limit Order Books," Papers 1012.0349, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2013.
    15. Olivier Gu'eant, 2013. "Permanent market impact can be nonlinear," Papers 1305.0413, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2014.
    16. Yan, Tingjin & Chiu, Mei Choi & Wong, Hoi Ying, 2023. "Portfolio liquidation with delayed information," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    17. Masamitsu Ohnishi & Makoto Shimoshimizu, 2022. "Optimal Pair–Trade Execution with Generalized Cross–Impact," Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, Springer;Japanese Association of Financial Economics and Engineering, vol. 29(2), pages 253-289, June.
    18. Ibrahim Ekren & Johannes Muhle-Karbe, 2017. "Portfolio Choice with Small Temporary and Transient Price Impact," Papers 1705.00672, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2020.
    19. Nikolay A. Andreev, 2015. "Worst-Case Approach To Strategic Optimal Portfolio Selection Under Transaction Costs And Trading Limits," HSE Working papers WP BRP 45/FE/2015, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    20. Francesco Cordoni & Fabrizio Lillo, 2024. "Instabilities in multi-asset and multi-agent market impact games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 336(1), pages 505-539, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:fininn:v:10:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1186_s40854-024-00613-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.