IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jfinan/v74y2019i4p1621-1658.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Price Discovery without Trading: Evidence from Limit Orders

Author

Listed:
  • JONATHAN BROGAARD
  • TERRENCE HENDERSHOTT
  • RYAN RIORDAN

Abstract

We analyze the contribution to price discovery of market and limit orders by high‐frequency traders (HFTs) and non‐HFTs. While market orders have a larger individual price impact, limit orders are far more numerous. This results in price discovery occurring predominantly through limit orders. HFTs submit the bulk of limit orders and these limit orders provide most of the price discovery. Submissions of limit orders and their contribution to price discovery fall with volatility due to changes in HFTs’ behavior. Consistent with adverse selection arising from faster reactions to public information, HFTs’ informational advantage is partially explained by public information.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan Brogaard & Terrence Hendershott & Ryan Riordan, 2019. "Price Discovery without Trading: Evidence from Limit Orders," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 74(4), pages 1621-1658, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:1621-1658
    DOI: 10.1111/jofi.12769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12769
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nilabhra Bhattacharya & Bidisha Chakrabarty & Xu (Frank) Wang, 0. "High-frequency traders and price informativeness during earnings announcements," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-44.
    2. Bellia, Mario & Christensen, Kim & Kolokolov, Aleksey & Pelizzon, Loriana & Renò, Roberto, 2020. "High-frequency trading during flash crashes: Walk of fame or hall of shame?," SAFE Working Paper Series 270, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    3. Sudhanshu Pani, 2020. "A Theory of 'Auction as a Search' in speculative markets," Papers 2006.00775, arXiv.org.
    4. Patel, Vinay & Putniņš, Tālis J. & Michayluk, David & Foley, Sean, 2020. "Price discovery in stock and options markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Nawn, Samarpan & Banerjee, Ashok, 2019. "Do the limit orders of proprietary and agency algorithmic traders discover or obscure security prices?," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 109-125.
    6. Lien, Donald & Hung, Pi-Hsia & Lin, Zong-Wei, 2020. "Whose trades move stock prices? Evidence from the Taiwan Stock Exchange," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 25-50.
    7. Robert Garrison & Pankaj Jain & Mark Paddrik, 2019. "Cross-Asset Market Order Flow, Liquidity, and Price Discovery," Working Papers 19-04, Office of Financial Research, US Department of the Treasury.
    8. Roberto Riccò & Barbara Rindi & Duane J. Seppi, 2020. "Information, Liquidity, and Dynamic Limit Order Markets," Working Papers 660, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    9. Corey Garriot & Ryan Riordan, 2020. "Trading on Long-term Information," Staff Working Papers 20-20, Bank of Canada.
    10. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Brunetti, Celso, 2020. "High frequency traders and the price process," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(1), pages 20-45.
    11. Yamamoto, Ryuichi, 2020. "Limit order submission risks, order choice, and tick size," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    12. Comerton-Forde, Carole & Grégoire, Vincent & Zhong, Zhuo, 2019. "Inverted fee structures, tick size, and market quality," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 141-164.
    13. Philip, R., 2020. "Estimating permanent price impact via machine learning," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 215(2), pages 414-449.
    14. Mynbaev, Kairat, 2020. "Using full limit order book for price jump prediction," MPRA Paper 101684, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jfinan:v:74:y:2019:i:4:p:1621-1658. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/afaaaea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.