IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2508.12471.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do STEM graduates fare better at times of Crises? Evidence from COVID 19 pandemic in India

Author

Listed:
  • Jheelum Sarkar

Abstract

I study whether and to what extent STEM college degrees offer labor market resilience during the COVID 19 shock. Both the pandemic and its nationwide lockdown affected occupations unevenly. While some jobs could adapt by switching to remote work or surging demand, others could not. Using the nationally representative high-frequency labor force survey data (2017-2023), I used a difference-in-difference strategy to compare changes in employment participation and monthly earnings between STEM and non-STEM graduates during and after the pandemic. The results suggest that individuals with a STEM college degree were more likely to be employed compared to their non-STEM counterparts during and after the pandemic period. Although STEM graduates appeared to experience higher wage growth compared to their non-STEM peers, the difference was statistically insignificant. Additional evidence on mechanisms suggests that the results are driven by the type of industries with higher share of STEM graduates, their geographical location and their career stages. The main findings were robust across alternative specifications and falsification tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Jheelum Sarkar, 2025. "Do STEM graduates fare better at times of Crises? Evidence from COVID 19 pandemic in India," Papers 2508.12471, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.12471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2508.12471
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2508.12471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.