IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2507.19487.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Does AI and Human Advice Mitigate Punishment for Selfish Behavior? An Experiment on AI ethics From a Psychological Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Margarita Leib
  • Nils Kobis
  • Ivan Soraperra

Abstract

People increasingly rely on AI-advice when making decisions. At times, such advice can promote selfish behavior. When individuals abide by selfishness-promoting AI advice, how are they perceived and punished? To study this question, we build on theories from social psychology and combine machine-behavior and behavioral economic approaches. In a pre-registered, financially-incentivized experiment, evaluators could punish real decision-makers who (i) received AI, human, or no advice. The advice (ii) encouraged selfish or prosocial behavior, and decision-makers (iii) behaved selfishly or, in a control condition, behaved prosocially. Evaluators further assigned responsibility to decision-makers and their advisors. Results revealed that (i) prosocial behavior was punished very little, whereas selfish behavior was punished much more. Focusing on selfish behavior, (ii) compared to receiving no advice, selfish behavior was penalized more harshly after prosocial advice and more leniently after selfish advice. Lastly, (iii) whereas selfish decision-makers were seen as more responsible when they followed AI compared to human advice, punishment between the two advice sources did not vary. Overall, behavior and advice content shape punishment, whereas the advice source does not.

Suggested Citation

  • Margarita Leib & Nils Kobis & Ivan Soraperra, 2025. "Does AI and Human Advice Mitigate Punishment for Selfish Behavior? An Experiment on AI ethics From a Psychological Perspective," Papers 2507.19487, arXiv.org.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.19487
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.19487
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ernst Fehr & Urs Fischbacher, "undated". "Third Party Punishment and Social Norms," IEW - Working Papers 106, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
    2. Poszler, Franziska & Lange, Benjamin, 2024. "The impact of intelligent decision-support systems on humans' ethical decision-making: A systematic literature review and an integrated framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Nils Köbis & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2021. "Bad machines corrupt good morals," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 5(6), pages 679-685, June.
    4. Köbis, Nils & Rahwan, Zoe & Bersch, Clara & Ajaj, Tamer & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Rahwan, Iyad, 2024. "Experimental evidence that delegating to intelligent machines can increase dishonest behaviour," OSF Preprints dnjgz, Center for Open Science.
    5. Christopher Starke & Alfio Ventura & Clara Bersch & Meeyoung Cha & Claes Vreese & Philipp Doebler & Mengchen Dong & Nicole Krämer & Margarita Leib & Jochen Peter & Lea Schäfer & Ivan Soraperra & Jessi, 2024. "Risks and protective measures for synthetic relationships," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 8(10), pages 1834-1836, October.
    6. Edmond Awad & Sydney Levine & Max Kleiman-Weiner & Sohan Dsouza & Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Azim Shariff & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2020. "Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 4(2), pages 134-143, February.
    7. Yam, Kai Chi & Tan, Tiffany & Jackson, Joshua Conrad & Shariff, Azim & Gray, Kurt, 2023. "Cultural Differences in People's Reactions and Applications of Robots, Algorithms, and Artificial Intelligence," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 19(5), pages 859-875, October.
    8. Edmond Awad & Sohan Dsouza & Richard Kim & Jonathan Schulz & Joseph Henrich & Azim Shariff & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "The Moral Machine experiment," Nature, Nature, vol. 563(7729), pages 59-64, November.
    9. Trevino, Linda Klebe & Weaver, Gary R., 1994. "Business ETHICS/BUSINESS ethics: One Field or Two?," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(2), pages 113-128, April.
    10. repec:osf:osfxxx:dnjgz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan & Azim Shariff, 2024. "The Moral Psychology of Artificial Intelligence," Post-Print hal-04220044, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Qiyuan & Wallbridge, Christopher D. & Jones, Dylan M. & Morgan, Phillip L., 2024. "Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Hensel, Lukas & Witte, Marc & Caria, A. Stefano & Fetzer, Thiemo & Fiorin, Stefano & Götz, Friedrich M. & Gomez, Margarita & Haushofer, Johannes & Ivchenko, Andriy & Kraft-Todd, Gordon & Reutskaja, El, 2022. "Global Behaviors, Perceptions, and the Emergence of Social Norms at the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 473-496.
    3. Elias Fernández Domingos & Inês Terrucha & Rémi Suchon & Jelena Grujić & Juan Burguillo & Francisco Santos & Tom Lenaerts, 2022. "Delegation to artificial agents fosters prosocial behaviors in the collective risk dilemma," Post-Print hal-04296038, HAL.
    4. Köbis, Nils & Rahwan, Zoe & Bersch, Clara & Ajaj, Tamer & Bonnefon, Jean-François & Rahwan, Iyad, 2024. "Experimental evidence that delegating to intelligent machines can increase dishonest behaviour," OSF Preprints dnjgz, Center for Open Science.
    5. Ungureanu, Paula & Bellesia, Francesca & Cochis, Carlotta, 2025. "Dealing with blame in digital ecosystems: The DAO failure in the Ethereum blockchain," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    6. Gordillo Chávez, Danitza & Cloarec, Julien & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2024. "Opening the moral machine’s cover: How algorithmic aversion shapes autonomous vehicle adoption," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    7. repec:osf:osfxxx:dnjgz_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Wendelin Schnedler & Nina Lucia Stephan, 2020. "Revisiting a Remedy Against Chains of Unkindness," Schmalenbach Business Review, Springer;Schmalenbach-Gesellschaft, vol. 72(3), pages 347-364, July.
    9. H Peyton Young, 2014. "The Evolution of Social Norms," Economics Series Working Papers 726, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    10. Karla Hoff & Mayuresh Kshetramade & Ernst Fehr, 2011. "Caste and Punishment: the Legacy of Caste Culture in Norm Enforcement," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 121(556), pages 449-475, November.
    11. Chen, Changdong, 2024. "How consumers respond to service failures caused by algorithmic mistakes: The role of algorithmic interpretability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Nils Köbis & Zoe Rahwan & Raluca Rilla & Bramantyo Ibrahim Supriyatno & Clara Bersch & Tamer Ajaj & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2025. "Delegation to artificial intelligence can increase dishonest behaviour," Nature, Nature, vol. 646(8083), pages 126-134, October.
    13. Christian Thöni, 2014. "Inequality aversion and antisocial punishment," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 76(4), pages 529-545, April.
    14. Angelsen, Arild & Naime, Julia, 2024. "The mixed impacts of peer punishments on common-pool resources: Multi-country experimental evidence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Christine Clavien & Colby J Tanner & Fabrice Clément & Michel Chapuisat, 2012. "Choosy Moral Punishers," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(6), pages 1-6, June.
    16. Erin L. Krupka & Roberto A. Weber, 2013. "Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 11(3), pages 495-524, June.
    17. Asiedu, Edward & Ibanez, Marcela, 2014. "Are the elder more effective implementing punishment? Experimental evidence from urban Ghana," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 175303, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    18. Christian Koch, 2024. "Is there a nexus between pro-social behavior and well-being? Correlational evidence," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 10(2), pages 279-293, December.
    19. Schleich, Joachim & Alsheimer, Sven, 2024. "The relationship between willingness to pay and carbon footprint knowledge: Are individuals willing to pay more to offset their carbon footprint if they learn about its size and distance to the 1.5 °C," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    20. Josep M. Lozano, 2022. "From Business Ethics to Business Education: Peter-Hans Kolvenbach’s Contribution," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 135-156, April.
    21. Kenju Kamei & Louis Putterman, 2018. "Reputation Transmission Without Benefit To The Reporter: A Behavioral Underpinning Of Markets In Experimental Focus," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 56(1), pages 158-172, January.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2507.19487. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.