IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2505.20527.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial literacy, robo-advising, and the demand for human financial advice: Evidence from Italy

Author

Listed:
  • David Aristei
  • Manuela Gallo

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of objective financial knowledge, confidence in one's financial skills, and digital financial literacy on individuals' decisions to seek financial advice from robo-advice platforms. Using microdata from the Bank of Italy's 2023 survey on Italian adults' financial literacy, we find that individuals with greater financial knowledge are less inclined to rely on online services for automated financial advice. Conversely, confidence in one's financial abilities and digital financial literacy enhance the likelihood of utilising robo-advice services. Trust in financial innovation, the use of digital financial services, and the propensity to take risks and save also emerge as significant predictors of an individual's use of robo-advice. We also provide evidence of a significant complementary relationship between the adoption of robo-advisory services and the demand for independent professional human advice. By contrast, a substitution effect is found for non-independent human advice. These findings highlight the importance of hybrid solutions in professional financial consulting, where robo-advisory services complement human financial advice.

Suggested Citation

  • David Aristei & Manuela Gallo, 2025. "Financial literacy, robo-advising, and the demand for human financial advice: Evidence from Italy," Papers 2505.20527, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.20527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.20527
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.20527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.