IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/arx/papers/2505.07761.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Singular Control in Inventory Management with Smooth Ambiguity

Author

Listed:
  • Arnon Archankul
  • Jacco J. J. Thijssen

Abstract

We consider singular control in inventory management under Knightian uncertainty, where decision makers have a smooth ambiguity preference over Gaussian-generated priors. We demonstrate that continuous-time smooth ambiguity is the infinitesimal limit of Kalman-Bucy filtering with recursive robust utility. Additionally, we prove that the cost function can be determined by solving forward-backward stochastic differential equations with quadratic growth. With a sufficient condition and utilising variational inequalities in a viscosity sense, we derive the value function and optimal control policy. By the change-of-coordinate technique, we transform the problem into two-dimensional singular control, offering insights into model learning and aligning with classical singular control free boundary problems. We numerically implement our theory using a Markov chain approximation, where inventory is modeled as cash management following an arithmetic Brownian motion. Our numerical results indicate that the continuation region can be divided into three key areas: (i) the target region; (ii) the region where it is optimal to learn and do nothing; and (iii) the region where control becomes predominant and learning should inactive. We demonstrate that ambiguity drives the decision maker to act earlier, leading to a smaller continuation region. This effect becomes more pronounced at the target region as the decision maker gains confidence from a longer learning period. However, these dynamics do not extend to the third region, where learning is excluded.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnon Archankul & Jacco J. J. Thijssen, 2025. "Singular Control in Inventory Management with Smooth Ambiguity," Papers 2505.07761, arXiv.org.
  • Handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.07761
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.07761
    File Function: Latest version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J. Michael Harrison & Michael I. Taksar, 1983. "Instantaneous Control of Brownian Motion," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 439-453, August.
    2. Peter Klibanoff & Massimo Marinacci & Sujoy Mukerji, 2005. "A Smooth Model of Decision Making under Ambiguity," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 73(6), pages 1849-1892, November.
    3. Tiziano Angelis, 2020. "Optimal dividends with partial information and stopping of a degenerate reflecting diffusion," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 71-123, January.
    4. Nishimura, Kiyohiko G. & Ozaki, Hiroyuki, 2007. "Irreversible investment and Knightian uncertainty," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 668-694, September.
    5. Costis Skiadas, 2013. "Smooth Ambiguity Aversion toward Small Risks and Continuous-Time Recursive Utility," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(4), pages 000.
    6. Basei, Matteo & Ferrari, Giorgio & Rodosthenous, Neofytos, 2024. "Uncertainty over uncertainty in environmental policy adoption: Bayesian learning of unpredictable socioeconomic costs," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    7. Zengjing Chen & Larry Epstein, 2002. "Ambiguity, Risk, and Asset Returns in Continuous Time," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1403-1443, July.
    8. Klibanoff, Peter & Marinacci, Massimo & Mukerji, Sujoy, 2009. "Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 930-976, May.
    9. Larry G. Epstein & Stanley E. Zin, 2013. "Substitution, risk aversion and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: A theoretical framework," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 12, pages 207-239, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    10. George M. Constantinides, 1976. "Stochastic Cash Management with Fixed and Proportional Transaction Costs," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(12), pages 1320-1331, August.
    11. Lars Peter Hansen & Jianjun Miao, 2022. "Asset pricing under smooth ambiguity in continuous time," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(2), pages 335-371, September.
    12. Avner Bar-Ilan & Agnès Sulem, 1995. "Explicit Solution of Inventory Problems with Delivery Lags," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 709-720, August.
    13. Hansen, Lars Peter & Sargent, Thomas J., 2011. "Robustness and ambiguity in continuous time," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 146(3), pages 1195-1223, May.
    14. Matteo Basei & Giorgio Ferrari & Neofytos Rodosthenous, 2023. "Uncertainty over Uncertainty in Environmental Policy Adoption: Bayesian Learning of Unpredictable Socioeconomic Costs," Papers 2304.10344, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    15. Se Yoon Lee, 2022. "Gibbs sampler and coordinate ascent variational inference: A set-theoretical review," Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(6), pages 1549-1568, March.
    16. repec:nas:journl:v:115:y:2018:p:9163-9168 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989. "Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
    18. Thijssen, Jacco J.J., 2011. "Incomplete markets, ambiguity, and irreversible investment," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 909-921, June.
    19. Eppen, Gary D & Fama, Eugene F, 1969. "Cash Balance and Simple Dynamic Portfolio Problems with Proportional Costs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 10(2), pages 119-133, June.
    20. M. Trojanowska & P. M. Kort, 2010. "The Worst Case for Real Options," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 146(3), pages 709-734, September.
    21. VIAL, Jean-Philippe, 1972. "A continuous time model for the cash balance problem," LIDAM Reprints CORE 127, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arnon Archankul & Giorgio Ferrari & Tobias Hellmann & Jacco J. J. Thijssen, 2023. "Singular Control in a Cash Management Model with Ambiguity," Papers 2309.12014, arXiv.org.
    2. Aït-Sahalia, Yacine & Matthys, Felix, 2019. "Robust consumption and portfolio policies when asset prices can jump," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1-56.
    3. Hui Chen & Nengjiu Ju & Jianjun Miao, 2014. "Dynamic Asset Allocation with Ambiguous Return Predictability," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 17(4), pages 799-823, October.
    4. Nengjiu Ju & Jianjun Miao, 2012. "Ambiguity, Learning, and Asset Returns," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 80(2), pages 559-591, March.
    5. Miao, Jianjun & Wang, Neng, 2011. "Risk, uncertainty, and option exercise," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 442-461, April.
    6. Daniele Pennesi, 2013. "Asset Prices in an Ambiguous Economy," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 315, Collegio Carlo Alberto.
    7. So, Leh-chyan, 2013. "Are Real Options “Real”? Isolating Uncertainty from Risk in Real Options Analysis," MPRA Paper 52493, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Balter, Anne G. & Mahayni, Antje & Schweizer, Nikolaus, 2021. "Time-consistency of optimal investment under smooth ambiguity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 293(2), pages 643-657.
    9. Suzuki, Masataka, 2018. "Continuous-time smooth ambiguity preferences," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 30-44.
    10. Fouilloux, Jessica & Moraux, Franck & Viviani, Jean-Laurent, 2015. "Investing in finite-life carbon emissions reduction program under risk and idiosyncratic uncertainty," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 310-320.
    11. Hippolyte d’Albis & Emmanuel Thibault, 2018. "Ambiguous life expectancy and the demand for annuities," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 85(3), pages 303-319, October.
    12. Albrecht, E & Baum, Günter & Birsa, R & Bradamante, F & Bressan, A & Chapiro, A & Cicuttin, A & Ciliberti, P & Colavita, A & Costa, S & Crespo, M & Cristaudo, P & Dalla Torre, S & Diaz, V & Duic, V &, 2010. "Results from COMPASS RICH-1," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 535, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    13. Sumru Altug & Cem Cakmakli & Fabrice Collard & Sujoy Mukerji & Han Ozsoylev, 2020. "Ambiguous Business Cycles: A Quantitative Assessment," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 38, pages 220-237, October.
    14. Julian Thimme, 2017. "Intertemporal Substitution In Consumption: A Literature Review," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 226-257, February.
    15. Christian Traeger, 2014. "Why uncertainty matters: discounting under intertemporal risk aversion and ambiguity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 56(3), pages 627-664, August.
    16. Xepapadeas, Anastasios, 2024. "Uncertainty and climate change: The IPCC approach vs decision theory," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Jianjun Miao & Bin Wei & Hao Zhou, 2019. "Ambiguity Aversion and the Variance Premium," Quarterly Journal of Finance (QJF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 9(02), pages 1-36, June.
    18. Delaney, Laura, 2022. "The impact of operational delay on irreversible investment under Knightian uncertainty," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    19. Hening Liu, 2013. "Optimal Consumption and Portfolio Choice under Ambiguity for a Mean-reverting Risk Premium in Complete Markets," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 14(1), pages 21-52, May.
    20. Shuang Li & Haijun Wang, 2023. "Robust irreversible investment strategy with ambiguity to jump and diffusion risk," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 23(3), pages 645-665, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:arx:papers:2505.07761. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: arXiv administrators (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://arxiv.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.