IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/aiw/wpaper/50.html

What Do Others Think? Norm Beliefs and Women’s Work in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Hira Kaleem

    (Lahore School of Economics)

  • Anri Sakakibara

    (Technical University of Munich (TUM))

  • Waqar Wadho

    (Lahore School of Economics)

  • Abu Siddique

    (Royal Holloway & IFS)

Abstract

Female labor force participation in LMICs remains persistently low, despite improvements in women’s education, fertility, and income that would normally predict higher participation. We argue that this pattern can reflect a coordination failure sustained by miscalibrated second-order beliefs about community approval of women working outside the home. In many households, a woman’s employment is determined by more than one decision-maker, and each may care about the perceived approval of both men and women in the community. Therefore, the binding misperception can lie in any of four belief cells: men’s beliefs about men, men’s beliefs about women, women’s beliefs about men, or women’s beliefs about women. We study these possibilities using novel primary survey data from more than 4,000 low-income Pakistani households. Within households, we elicit each respondent’s own support for women’s work, second-order beliefs about community support, and the target woman’s labor-market behavior, comparing households within the same census block. We find that support for women’s work is widely underestimated, especially support among women, so communities are substantially more accepting than their members believe. The belief most strongly associated with a woman’s search and work history is her own perception of other women’s approval. Male household members’ beliefs matter mainly for women’s current employment status, consistent with their role in granting permission. The belief that appears most important is also correlated across generations along gender lines: mothers’ beliefs about women predict daughters’ beliefs about women. Evidence on mechanisms points most strongly to social learning about respectability rather than the anticipation of social sanctions from other women.

Suggested Citation

  • Hira Kaleem & Anri Sakakibara & Waqar Wadho & Abu Siddique, 2026. "What Do Others Think? Norm Beliefs and Women’s Work in Pakistan," Munich Papers in Political Economy 50, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
  • Handle: RePEc:aiw:wpaper:50
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mgt.tum.de/fileadmin/mgt.tum.de/faculty_and_research/mppe/49_InformationRedistribution_Final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • D13 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Household Production and Intrahouse Allocation
    • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aiw:wpaper:50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MPPE (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtumde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.