IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/umaeth/121798.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The diffusion of trace element technology: an economic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Pardey, Philip G.

Abstract

This study will endeavour to quantify the innovative and imitative aspects of copper-zinc adoption for chosen regions of the State of South Australia. This will be followed by attempts to ‘explain’ any observed inter-regional differences in the estimated adoption parameters. Chapter 2 will provide a brief overview of the scientific investigations which uncovered the relatively dramatic impact of copperzinc fertilizers on broad-acre crop and pasture production. This will be followed in Chapter 3 by a detailed consideration of the techniques used by previous studies to quantify observed adoption patterns. Particular emphasis will be given to the (symmetry) assumptions of the commonly employed logistic function as it relates to studies of the diffusion of new technologies. The techniques used to aggregate the 24,000 observations, which constitute the raw data base of this study, will be detailed in Chapter 4. The subsequent Chapter will attempt to assess empirically the validity of the symmetry assumption with respect to the observed patterns of adoption. On the basis of these findings, Chapter 6 will outline the procedures used to quantify the innovative and imitative aspects of trace element adoption. The parameters so derived will be tabulated. Chapter 7 will notionaily consist of three parts. Part A will detail, at both the conceptual and empirical levels, those factors which on a pr2ori reasoning may account for inter-regional differences in the parameters of adoption. Part B will present and discuss the multiple regression results which were obtained when attempting to ‘explain’ innovative aspects of copper-zinc adoption using the factors mentioned above. Multiple regression techniques will also be used to determine the ‘explanatory’ significance of these same factors in relation to the imitative aspects of copper-zinc adoption. This will account for Part C of Chapter 7. The conclusions of this study will then be detailed in Chapter 8.

Suggested Citation

  • Pardey, Philip G., 1978. "The diffusion of trace element technology: an economic analysis," Faculty and Alumni Dissertations 121798, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:umaeth:121798
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.121798
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/121798/files/PardeyMS1978.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.121798?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anderson, Jock R. & Dillon, John L. & Hardaker, Brian, 1977. "Agricultural Decision Analysis," Monographs: Applied Economics, AgEcon Search, number 288652, October.
    2. Jock R. Anderson, 1972. "Risk And Farm Size In The Pastoral Zone," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, April.
    3. Ronald C. Duncan, 1972. "Technological Change In The Arid Zone Of New South Wales," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 16(1), pages 22-33, April.
    4. John L. Dillon & J. R. Anderson, 1971. "Allocative Efficiency, Traditional Agriculture, and Risk," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 53(1), pages 26-32.
    5. Ronald Hsia, 1973. "Technological Change in the Industrial Growth of Hong Kong," International Economic Association Series, in: B. R. Williams (ed.), Science and Technology in Economic Growth, chapter 13, pages 335-359, Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Kennedy, Charles & Thirlwall, A P, 1972. "Technical Progress: A Survey," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 82(325), pages 11-72, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lindner, Robert K. & Pardey, Philip G. & Jarrett, Frank G., 1982. "Distance To Information Source And The Time Lag To Early Adoption Of Trace Element Fertilisers," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(2), pages 1-16, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young, Douglas & Lin, William & Pope, Rulon & Robison, Lindon & Selley, Roger, 1979. "Risk Preferences Of Agricultual Producers:Their Measurement And Use," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271459, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    2. Jock R. Anderson, 1982. "Agricultural Economics, Interdependence And Uncertainty," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 26(2), pages 89-97, August.
    3. Anderson, Jock R. & Griffiths, William E., 1981. "Production Risk And Input Use: Pastoral Zone Of Eastern Australia," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 25(2), pages 1-11, August.
    4. Vieth, Gary R. & Suppapanya, Pramote, 1996. "An Evaluation Of Selected Decision Models: A Case Of Crop Choice In Northern Thailand," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Torkamani, Javad & Hardaker, J. Brian, 1996. "A study of economic efficiency of Iranian farmers in Ramjerd district: an application of stochastic programming," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 73-83, July.
    6. Martin, John F., 1982. "Induced Innovation in the High Rainfall Zone," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 50(03), pages 1-20, December.
    7. Musser, Wesley N., 1992. "A Historical Overview of Estimation of Historical Risk Coefficients," 1992 Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk Meeting, March 22-25, 1992, Orlando, Florida 307862, Regional Research Projects > S-232: Quantifying Long Run Agricultural Risks and Evaluating Farmer Responses to Risk.
    8. Anderson, Kim B. & Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1996. "Risk Management Programs In Extension," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(01), pages 1-8, July.
    9. Liu, Xuanli & Miller, Gay Y. & McNamara, Paul E., 2005. "Do Antibiotics Reduce Production Risk for U.S. Pork Producers?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 37(3), pages 1-11, December.
    10. Doppler, Werner & Salman, Amer Z. & Al-Karablieh, Emad K. & Wolff, Heinz-Peter, 2002. "The impact of water price strategies on the allocation of irrigation water: the case of the Jordan Valley," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 171-182, June.
    11. Sugu M.M. Zuhair & Daniel B. Taylor & Randall A. Kramer, 1992. "Choice of utility function form: its effect on classification of risk preferences and the prediction of farmer decisions," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(4), pages 333-344, April.
    12. Castejon, Mario & Moss, Charles B. & Ford, Stephen A., 1989. "Effect Of Debt Position On The Choice Of Marketing Strategies For Florida Orange Growers," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270465, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Serrao, Amilcar & Coelho, Luis, 2004. "Cumulative Prospect Theory: A Study Of The Farmers' Decision Behavior In The Alentejo Dryland Region Of Portugal," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 20245, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Nieuwoudt, W. L., 1984. "The Viability Of An Agricultural Crop Insurance Programme - A Policy Issue," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 23(2), October.
    15. Kerry J. Stott & Brendan Christy & Malcolm McCaskill & Kurt K. Benke & Penny Riffkin & Garry J. O'Leary & Robert Norton, 2020. "Integrating crop modelling and production economics to investigate multiple nutrient deficiencies and yield gaps," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), pages 655-676, July.
    16. Hardaker, J. B., 1982. "Fundamental Aspects Of Risk And Uncertainty In Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    17. Taylor, R. Garth & Young, Robert A., 1995. "Rural-To-Urban Water Transfers: Measuring Direct Foregone Benefits Of Irrigation Water Under Uncertain Water Supplies," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Sheahan, Megan & Black, Roy & Jayne, T.S., 2013. "Are Kenyan farmers under-utilizing fertilizer? Implications for input intensification strategies and research," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 39-52.
    19. Featherstone, Allen M. & Moss, Charles B., 1990. "Quantifying Gains To Risk Diversification Using Certainty Equivalence In A Mean-Variance Model: An Application To Florida Citrus," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(2), pages 1-7, December.
    20. John Quiggin, 1981. "Risk Perception And The Analysis Of Risk Attitudes," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 25(2), pages 160-169, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:umaeth:121798. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daumnus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.