IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersab/33661.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Unknown

Abstract

Please also see Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture. This report summarizes the implications of regionalism for the United States, focusing on the effects of major RTA's on U.S. agriculture. Regional trade agreements (RTA's) have become a fixture in the global trade arena. Their advocates contend that RTA's can serve as building blocks for multilateral trade liberalization. Their opponents argue that these trade pacts will divert trade from more efficient nonmember producing countries. U.S. agriculture can benefit from participating in RTA's and may lose when it does not. Agriculture is the source of most potential U.S. gains from RTA's.

Suggested Citation

  • Unknown, 1998. "Regional Trade Agreements and U.S. Agriculture," Agricultural Information Bulletins 33661, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:33661
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/33661/files/ai980745.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Winters, L. Alan, 1996. "Regionalism versus multilateralism," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1687, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Allan N. Rae, 2007. "Regional agricultural trade liberalization - Priorities for policy makers and future research needs," STUDIES IN TRADE AND INVESTMENT, in: Studies in Trade and Investment - AGRICULTURAL TRADE - PLANTING THE SEEDS OF REGIONAL LIBERALIZATION IN ASIA, volume 60, pages 295-309, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP).
    2. Turner, James A. & Buongiorno, Joseph & Zhu, Shushuai, 2005. "Effects of the Free Trade Area of the Americas on Forest Resources," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 34(1), pages 1-15, April.
    3. Shinyekwa, Isaac & Othieno, Lawrence, 2013. "Comparing the Performance of Uganda’s Intra-East African Community Trade and Other Trading Blocs: A Gravity Model Analysis," Research Series 150227, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).
    4. Karen Thierfelder & Sherman Robinson, 2003. "Trade and Tradability: Exports, Imports, and Factor Markets in the Salter‐Swan Model," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(244), pages 103-111, March.
    5. Hertel, Thomas W. & Reimer, Jeffrey J. & Valenzuela, Ernesto, 2003. "Incorporating Commodity Stockholding Behavior Into A Short-Run General Equilibrium Model Of The Global Economy," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 22110, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Walters, Lurleen M. & Lowe, Garfield G. & Davis, Carlton George, 2003. "Economic Asymmetries, Trade Liberalization and Integration: Issues and Policy Implications for CARICOM Countries," Monographs, University of Florida, International Agricultural Trade and Policy Center, number 15703.
    7. Pavel Ciaian, 2002. "The impact of the Common Agricultural Policy on income distribution and welfare in Central and Eastern European Countries," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2002_02, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    8. Banse, Martin & Münch, Wolfgang & Tangermann, Stefan, 2000. "Eastern Enlargement of the European Union: General and Partial Equilibrium Analysis," 2000 Conference, August 13-18, 2000, Berlin, Germany 197223, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Oliver Mendoza-Cano & Ramón Alberto Sánchez-Piña & Álvaro Jesús González-Ibarra & Efrén Murillo-Zamora & Cynthia Monique Nava-Garibaldi, 2016. "Health Impacts from Corn Production Pre-and Post-NAFTA Trade Agreement (1986–2013)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Hertel, Thomas W. & Reimer, Jeffrey J. & Valenzuela, Ernesto, 2005. "Incorporating commodity stockholding into a general equilibrium model of the global economy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 646-664, July.
    11. Zhi Wang & Bill Coyle, 2002. "APEC Open Regionalism and its Impact on the World Economy: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(4), pages 563-589, April.
    12. Burfisher, Mary E. & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2004. "Regionalism," MTID discussion papers 65, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Doan, Darcie & Goldstein, Andrew & Zahniser, Steven & Vollrath, Thomas L. & Bolling, H. Christine, 2004. "North American Integration In Agriculture: A Survey Paper," North American Agrifood Integration: Situation and Perspectives, May 2004, Cancun, Mexico 16730, Farm Foundation.
    14. Shinyekwa, Isaac & Lawrence, Othieno, 2013. "Comparing the Performance of Uganda’s Intra-East African Community Trade and Other Trading Blocs: A Gravity Model Analysis," Research Series 159667, Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Grether, Jean-Marie & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 1998. "Preferential and non-preferential trade flows in world trade," WTO Staff Working Papers ERAD-98-10, World Trade Organization (WTO), Economic Research and Statistics Division.
    2. Cadot, Olivier & de Melo, Jaime & Olarreaga, Marcelo, 2001. "Can bilateralism ease the pains of multilateral trade liberalization?," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 27-44, January.
    3. Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2002. "Trade liberalisation and regional integration: the search for large numbers," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1-20.
    4. Baldwin, Richard Edward & Rieder , Roland, 2007. "A Test of Endogenous Trade Bloc Formation Theory on EU Data," East Asian Economic Review, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, vol. 11(2), pages 77-110, December.
    5. Jennifer Pédussel Wu, 2005. "Trade Agreements as Self‐Protection," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 472-484, August.
    6. Sapir, Andre, 1998. "The political economy of EC regionalism," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(3-5), pages 717-732, May.
    7. Arvind Panagariya, 1999. "The Regionalism Debate: An Overview," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(4), pages 455-476, June.
    8. Omar Feraboli, 2012. "Preferential vs. Full Trade Liberalisation: A Dynamic CGE Model with Heterogeneous Households for Jordan," Working Paper series 08_12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    9. Richard E. Baldwin, 2011. "Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocks on the Path to Global Free Trade," Chapters, in: Miroslav N. Jovanović (ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Integration, Volume I, chapter 2, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Stefan Csordás & Frank C. Krysiak, 2011. "Optimal containment and policy differentiation under unilateral climate policy," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 44(3), pages 814-837, August.
    11. Schiff, Maurice, 2000. "Multilateral trade liberalization and political disintegration - implications for the evolution of free trade areas and customs unions," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2350, The World Bank.
    12. Soliman, Marwan, 2004. "Regional Networking and Multilateral Context: Enhancing Capabilities in Africa," 2004 Inaugural Symposium, December 6-8, 2004, Nairobi, Kenya 9528, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    13. Mattoo, Aaditya & Fink, Carsten, 2004. "Regional Agreements and Trade in Services: Policy Issues," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 19, pages 742-779.
    14. Horn, Henrik & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2001. "Economic and legal aspects of the Most-Favored-Nation clause," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 233-279, June.
    15. Ms. Giorgia Albertin, 2008. "Regionalism or Multilateralism? A Political Economy Choice," IMF Working Papers 2008/065, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Bagwell,K. & Staiger,R.W., 2000. "GATT-think," Working papers 19, Wisconsin Madison - Social Systems.
    17. Omar FERABOLI, 2010. "A Dynamic Multisectoral Analysis of Jordan's Trade Liberalisation," EcoMod2004 330600050, EcoMod.
    18. Olarreaga, Marcelo & Soloaga, Isidro & Winters, L. Alan, 1999. "What's Behind Mercosur's CET?," CEPR Discussion Papers 2310, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    19. Arpita Mukherjee & Aditi Mody & Nisha Taneja & Ruchika Sachdeva, 2003. "Indo-Singapore trade in services: Enhancing co-operation," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 98, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    20. Constantinos Syropoulos, 2002. "On Tariff Preferences And Delegation Decisions In Customs Unions: A Heckscher--Ohlin Approach," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 112(481), pages 625-648, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersab:33661. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.