IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331286.html

The utilisation rate of preferences in the EU

Author

Listed:
  • Candau, Fabien
  • Fontagne, Lionel
  • Jean, Sébastien

Abstract

The objective of this work is to study how effective are EU's preferential agreements in granting their partners improved market access. In particular we assess how far preferences are indeed utilised by exporters, when entering the EU's market. The complexity of EU’s protection renders the exercise uneasy. In particular, many EU’s partners are eligible to several different preferential regimes, and the competition between regimes needsto be taken into account. Our results suggest that underutilisation of preferences does not have a large average impact on the protection faced by exporters when acceding the European market. Still, the utilisation of preferences is lower when the preferential margin is small, suggesting that compliance costs are not negligible. Most of all, the utilisation appears weak under the GSP for textile and apparels, and most of all for EBA for the same products. Restrictive rules of origin are here the main suspects.

Suggested Citation

  • Candau, Fabien & Fontagne, Lionel & Jean, Sébastien, 2004. "The utilisation rate of preferences in the EU," Conference papers 331286, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331286/files/1761.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Graham Pyatt & Jeffrey I. Round, 1977. "Social Accounting Matrices For Development Planning1," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 23(4), pages 339-364, December.
    2. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    3. repec:bla:revinw:v:23:y:1977:i:4:p:339-64 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bouet, Antoine, 2009. "The Expected Benefits of Trade Liberalization for World Income and Development: Opening the "Black Box" of Global Trade Modeling," Food Policy Reviews 53871, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Winston, Ashley, 2004. "Corporate Taxation, Corporate Finance and Investment: Theory and Applications in Dynamic CGE Modelling," Conference papers 331289, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Bchir, Mohamed Hedi & Fouquin, Michel, 2005. "Comparing Bilateral and Multilateral ASEAN-10+4 Free Trade Agreements Possible Impacts on Member and Non-member countries," Conference papers 331401, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Simon J.Evenett & Mia Mikic & Ravi Ratnayake (ed.), 2011. "Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr10.
    4. Eromenko, Igor, 2010. "Accession to the WTO. Computable General Equilibrium Analysis: the Case of Ukraine. Part I," MPRA Paper 67476, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Martin, Will, 2000. "Reducing carbon dioxide emissions through joint implementation of projects," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2359, The World Bank.
    6. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    7. Ivanic, Maros & Martin, Will, 2010. "Promoting Global Agricultural Growth and Poverty Reduction," Conference papers 331944, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Das, Gouranga G. & Maswana, Jean-Claude & Hirano, Yumeka, 2023. "Germs, Globalization, and Trade Spillovers: How could COVID-19 affect African Economies and AfCFTA," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1251, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    9. Ronald D. Sands & Katja Schumacher & Hannah Forster, 2014. "U.S. CO2 Mitigation in a Global Context: Welfare, Trade and Land Use," The Energy Journal, , vol. 35(1_suppl), pages 181-198, June.
    10. Sergey Paltsev & John Reilly, 2007. "Long-Term Energy Scenarios for Asia," Energy and Environmental Modeling 2007 24000047, EcoMod.
    11. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    12. Gruere, Guillaume P. & Mevel, Simon & Bouet, Antoine, 2007. "Genetically Modified Rice, International Trade, and First-Mover Advantage: The Case of India and China," 2007: China's Agricultural Trade: Issues and Prospects Symposium, July 2007, Beijing, China 55032, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    13. Peterson, Everett B., 2004. "A Comparison of Marketing Margins Across Sectors, Users, and Regions," Conference papers 331224, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. George Verikios & Xiao‐guang Zhang, 2004. "The Economic Effects of Removing Barriers to Trade in Telecommunications," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 435-458, March.
    15. Jiang, Tingsong, 2003. "The Impact of China's WTO Accession on its Regional Economies," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    16. Sergio Goldbaum & Allexandro Mori Coelho & Samir Cury, 2007. "The Effects of the Doha Round Non-Agricultural Market Access Negotiations in Brazil," EcoMod2007 23900029, EcoMod.
    17. Douglas H. Brooks & Susan F. Stone, 2010. "Accelerating Regional Integration: Issues at the Border," ADBI Working Papers 200, Asian Development Bank Institute.
    18. Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2011. "Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism," The Energy Journal, , vol. 32(4), pages 27-50, October.
    19. Nelson B. Villoria, 2009. "China and the Manufacturing Terms-of-Trade of African Exporters," Journal of African Economies, Centre for the Study of African Economies, vol. 18(5), pages 781-823, November.
    20. Nitsch, Volker & Sturm, Daniel, 2004. "The Trade Liberalization Effects of Regional Trade Agreements," Conference papers 331265, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.