IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/330971.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Three Future Scenarios for Greenhouse-Gas Emissions by Region in Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Adams, Philip D.
  • Mai, Yin Hua

Abstract

MMRF-Green is a bottoms-up model of the economies of Australia’s six states and two territories. It models each region as an economy in its own right, with region-specific prices, region-specific consumers, region-specific industries, and so on. This theoretical structure is supported by a database containing explicit representations of intra-regional, inter-regional and international trade flows based on regional input-output data developed at the Centre of Policy Studies. Each solution of MMRF-Green produces pictures of Australia’s regions at a high level of detail for a particular year. The model can also produce a sequence of annual solutions, linked together by ensuring, for example, that the quantities of opening capital stocks in any year equal the quantities of closing stocks in the previous year. This allows the model to make forecasts for the regional economies at a high level of detail over periods of policy relevance (say up to 10 years). The starting point for these forecasts is a set of scenarios for the macro economy supplied by a specialist-forecasting agency. The role of MMRF-Green is to forecast a microeconomic picture consistent with the macroeconomic scenarios and other inputs. The objective of this paper is to describe the latest set of forecasts for energy use and greenhouse-gas emissions derived from the model. These forecasts have been made for the Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO), which is the sponsor of the work. Three scenarios are reported and discussed. Most attention is given to the central case, which is our preferred scenario. The other two cases are upper and lower scenarios that provide plausible ranges for the forecast values of critical variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Adams, Philip D. & Mai, Yin Hua, 2002. "Three Future Scenarios for Greenhouse-Gas Emissions by Region in Australia," Conference papers 330971, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/330971/files/359.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yves Surry, 1992. "Modèle de transmission des prix garantis de céréales dans la Communauté Économique Européenne : développements théoriques et application à la France," Post-Print hal-01600616, HAL.
    2. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    3. Kilkenny, Maureen, 1991. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Agricultural Policies: Documentation of the 30-Sector FPGE GAMS Model of the United States," Staff Reports 278539, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Panayotova, Milena & Adler, Jens, 1999. "Development and future perspectives for Bulgarian raw milk production towards EU quality standards," IAMO Discussion Papers 19, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    5. Banse, Martin & Guba, Waldemar & Münch, Wolfgang, 1999. "Auswirkungen des EU-Beitritts auf die Wettbewerbsfähigkeit der Landwirtschaft und Ernährungsindustrie in Polen und Ungarn," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 48(08-09).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Salamon, P.B. & Herok, C.A., 2002. "Was bringen mögliche Ergebnisse der WTO-Verhandlungen und der Osterweiterung für den Milchmarkt?," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 37.
    2. Walmsley, Terrie L. & Winters, L. Alan, 2005. "Relaxing the Restrictions on the Temporary Movement of Natural Persons: A Simulation Analysis," Journal of Economic Integration, Center for Economic Integration, Sejong University, vol. 20, pages 688-726.
    3. Antimiani, Alessandro & Conforti, Piero & Salvatici, Luca, 2006. "Assessing Market Access: Do Developing Countries Really Get a Preferential Treatment?," Working Papers 18870, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    4. Hagen, Jürgen von & Ho, Tai-kuang, 2003. "Twin Crises: A Reexamination of Empirical Links," Conference papers 331091, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Shantong, Li & Zhai, Fan & Xuan, Xiaowei, 2003. "Assessing Environmental Effects of China's WTO Accession," Conference papers 331092, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Scott McDonald & Karen Thierfelder, 2005. "Impact of Switching Production to Bioenergy Crops: The Switchgrass Example January 2005," Working Papers 2005002, The University of Sheffield, Department of Economics, revised Jan 2005.
    7. Bchir, Mohamed Hedi & Fouquin, Michel, 2005. "Comparing Bilateral and Multilateral ASEAN-10+4 Free Trade Agreements Possible Impacts on Member and Non-member countries," Conference papers 331401, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. McDonald, Scott & Robinson, Sherman & Thierfelder, Karen, 2006. "Impact of switching production to bioenergy crops: The switchgrass example," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 243-265, March.
    9. Simon J.Evenett & Mia Mikic & Ravi Ratnayake (ed.), 2011. "Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr10.
    10. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    11. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    12. Jiang, Tingsong, 2003. "The Impact of China's WTO Accession on its Regional Economies," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    13. Henseler, Martin & Piot-Lepetit, Isabelle & Ferrari, Emanuele & Mellado, Aida Gonzalez & Banse, Martin & Grethe, Harald & Parisi, Claudia & Hélaine, Sophie, 2013. "On the asynchronous approvals of GM crops: Potential market impacts of a trade disruption of EU soy imports," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 166-176.
    14. Adams, Philip D., 2008. "Insurance against Catastrophic Climate Change: How Much Will an Emissions Trading Scheme Cost Australia?," Conference papers 331770, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    16. Pavel Ciaian & d'Artis Kancs & Jan Pokrivcak, 2008. "Comparative Advantages, Transaction Costs and Factor Content of Agricultural Trade: Empirical Evidence from the CEE," EERI Research Paper Series EERI_RP_2008_03, Economics and Econometrics Research Institute (EERI), Brussels.
    17. Kym Anderson & Anna Strutt, 2012. "Agriculture and Food Security in Asia by 2030," Macroeconomics Working Papers 23309, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    18. Dhoubhadel, Sunil P. & Taheripour, Farzad & Stockton, Mathew C., 2016. "Livestock Demand, Global Land Use, and Induced Greenhouse Gas Emissions," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235271, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Federico Perali & Stefania Lovo, 2009. "Counterfactual analysis using a regional dynamic general equilibrium model with historical calibration," Working Papers 58/2009, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    20. Mai, Yinhua, 2008. "Removing border protection on wheat and rice: effects on rural income and food self-sufficiency in China," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 52(2), pages 1-19.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:330971. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.