IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/6890.html

Final Exam Scores in Introductory Economics Courses: Effect of Course Delivery Method and Proctoring

Author

Listed:
  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J.

Abstract

There is a small but growing body of research exploring student learning in online courses. The current study compares student performance on the final exam in introductory economics courses taught online and in the classroom and considers the effect of proctoring the final exam. Students who took a course in the classroom did better on a proctored final exam than those taking the course online.

Suggested Citation

  • Wachenheim, Cheryl J., 2007. "Final Exam Scores in Introductory Economics Courses: Effect of Course Delivery Method and Proctoring," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 6890, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:6890
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6890/files/aer623.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6890?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Wuthisatian, Rattaphon, 2020. "Student exam performance in different proctored environments: Evidence from an online economics course," International Review of Economics Education, Elsevier, vol. 35(C).
    3. Gerardo P. Sicat & Kristine Joy S. Briones, 2009. "Determinants of Student Performance in the Introductory Economics Course in UP," UP School of Economics Discussion Papers 200906, University of the Philippines School of Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:6890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.