IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nbaece/306266.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Is Today’s Agricultural Policy the Appropriate Approach to Meeting the Needs of Rural Farm Families?

Author

Listed:
  • Supalla, Ray

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Supalla, Ray, 2002. "Is Today’s Agricultural Policy the Appropriate Approach to Meeting the Needs of Rural Farm Families?," Cornhusker Economics 306266, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:306266
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.306266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/306266/files/08-14-02.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.306266?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Susan Offutt, 2002. "The Future of Farm Policy Analysis: A Household Perspective," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 84(5), pages 1189-1200.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Distributional Effects of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs: Accounting for Farm and Non-Farm Households," Conference papers 331120, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Taylor, Mykel R. & Tonsor, Glynn T. & Wilson, Candice, 2017. "Factors Affecting 2014 Farm Bill Commodity Program Enrollment for Kansas Farmers," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258190, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N., 2009. "Does Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program and/or Off-Farm Work Affect the Level and Distribution of Farm Household Income?," Working Papers 57035, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Hill, Berkeley, 2005. "Institutional Units and Agricultural Statistics," 94th Seminar, April 9-10, 2005, Ashford, UK 24410, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Berkeley Hill, 2008. "Some Economics of Public Statistics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 387-420, September.
    6. Bruno Henry de Frahan & J r mie Dong & Rembert De Blander, 2017. "Farm Household Incomes in OECD Member Countries over the Last 30 Years of Public Support," LIS Working papers 700, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    7. de Mey, Yann & Wauters, Erwin & Lips, Markus & Schmid, Dirk & Vancauteren, Mark & Van Passel, Steven, 2014. "Farm household risk balancing in Switzerland and Belgium: an econometric and survey approach," 2014 International Congress, August 26-29, 2014, Ljubljana, Slovenia 186678, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Bryła, Paweł, 2010. "Długofalowe Tendencje Zmian Dochodów Rolniczych W „Starej” Unii," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 3(148).
    9. De Rosa, Marcello & Bartoli, Luca, 2016. "Adoption of rural development policies in rural areas of Italy: between family and farm strategy," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 17(2), June.
    10. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N., 2009. "The Conservation Reserve Program, Off-Farm Work, and Farm Household Technical Efficiencies," Working Papers 57034, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    11. Yann de Mey & Erwin Wauters & Dierk Schmid & Markus Lips & Mark Vancauteren & Steven Van Passel, 2016. "Farm household risk balancing: empirical evidence from Switzerland," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 637-662.
    12. Kwok, Yun-Kwong, 2004. "Global factor trade with differentiated factor prices and factor intensities," Conference papers 331173, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    13. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Mishra, Ashok K. & Nehring, Richard F. & Hendricks, Chad & Southern, Malaya & Gregory, Alexandra, 2007. "Off-Farm Income, Technology Adoption, And Farm Economic Performance," Economic Research Report 7234, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Elisa Maini & Marcello De Rosa & Yari Vecchio, 2021. "The Role of Education in the Transition towards Sustainable Agriculture: A Family Farm Learning Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-11, July.
    15. Boisvert, Richard N. & Chang, Hung-Hao, 2006. "Does Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program and Off-Farm Work Affect the Level and Distribution of Farm Household Incomes?," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21277, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    16. Hopkins, Jeffrey W. & Morehart, Mitchell J. & Johnson, James D. & Culver, David & Caldwell, John, 2004. "What Affects Farmers' Ability to Adjust: Evidence from the United States and Canada," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15766, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    17. Katherine Smith Evans & Mary Bohman, 2022. "Women agricultural economists in federal agencies: Making a difference," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(1), pages 54-70, March.
    18. Chang, Hung-Hao & Boisvert, Richard N., 2005. "Are Farmers' Decisions to Work off the Farm and Participate in the Conservation Reserve Program Independent, Joint or Sequential?," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19474, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    19. Crosthwaite, Jim, 2003. "Whole farm considerations in the design of management agreements," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57857, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    20. Dawn Thilmany, 2021. "Rebalancing Our Portfolio: Envisioning a More Inclusive, Altruistic, and Engaged AAEA," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(2), pages 408-421, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics; Farm Management;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nbaece:306266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daunlus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.