IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iefi16/244523.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Matching Brazilian Soybean Production to the EU Sustainability Standards’ Requirements. Compliance of the Sojaplus Management Program with the Fefac Guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • da Silva Júnior, Aziz Galvão
  • Zanasi, Cesare
  • de Souza Júnior, Wilson
  • Ajonas, João Vitor Gutierrez

Abstract

Soybean is a major ingredient for animal feeding in the EU, which is highly dependent on its import. Brazil is the main exporter of soy meal to Europe contributing to nearly 30% of EU total import of meal. The last ten years saw an increased demand from the EU feed and food industry in using sustainable raw material. In this context, the European Feed Manufacturer Federation (FEFAC) is currently discussing a guideline for the characteristics that sustainable soy production should have. At the same time, China has increased its share of import of soy and has become the main importer of soy in the world. Competition between Europe and Chine for the supply of soy is increasing. Trade barriers, due to complex sustainability requirements from the EU, could affect its import from Brazil. The SOJAPLUS program is a key initiative concerning the sustainability of soy production in Brazil. It was set up by the Brazilian Vegetable Oil Industries Association (ABIOVE) and by the Soybean Farmers Association (APROSOJA-MT). Considering the potential of this initiative to support the supply to the European market of significant amounts of sustainable soy, the objective of this paper is to discuss the possible harmonization of the sustainability criteria defined by these important EU and Brazilian soy market players. The two set of criteria have been compared, adopting the ITC data base and comparison method; the results show that SOJAPLUS comprises all FEFAC principles and most of its criteria. The main difference, however, is related to the verification system, which in SOJAPLUS is a 1st party system (self-verification) while the FEFAC guidelines consider a 3rd party system (audits); a relevant issue, common to both the FEFAC and SOJAPLUS approach, is related to the inclusion of GMO soy in the sustainability guidelines. As the FEFAC guidelines are still in discussion, there is a very interesting opportunity to harmonize both systems aiming at increasing the sustainability of soybean supply from Brazil to Europe by tackling the difficult challenges of 3rd party certification and GMO soy inclusion. The latter being a major concern for EU consumers, policy makers, farmers’ associations and other stakeholders involved in the processing and consumption of soy.

Suggested Citation

  • da Silva Júnior, Aziz Galvão & Zanasi, Cesare & de Souza Júnior, Wilson & Ajonas, João Vitor Gutierrez, 2016. "Matching Brazilian Soybean Production to the EU Sustainability Standards’ Requirements. Compliance of the Sojaplus Management Program with the Fefac Guidelines," 2016 International European Forum (151st EAAE Seminar), February 15-19, 2016, Innsbruck-Igls, Austria 244523, International European Forum on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iefi16:244523
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.244523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/244523/files/37-A8_AzizCesare%20PAPER_FINAL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.244523?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gale, Fred & Hansen, James & Jewison, Michael, 2015. "China’s Growing Demand for Agricultural Imports," Economic Information Bulletin 198800, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yu, Jisang & Villoria, Nelson B. & Hendricks, Nathan P., 2019. "The Incidence of Foreign Market Accessibility on Farmland Rental Rates," 2019: Recent Advances in Applied General Equilibrium Modeling: Relevance and Application to Agricultural Trade Analysis, December 8-10, 2019, Washington, DC 339333, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    2. Hovhannisyan, Vardges & Shanoyan, Aleksan, 2018. "An Empirical Analysis Of Welfare Consequences Of Rising Food Prices In Urban China: The Easi Approach," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 273987, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Hong, Chang & Liefert, William M. & Wang, Sun Ling, 2017. "Exchange Rates, Income Growth, and Chinese Agricultural Imports," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258447, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Montserrat Costa-Font & Cesar Revoredo-Giha, 2019. "Introduction of New Food Products in China: Is There a Trend towards Healthier and Safer Products?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Julia Jouan & Aude Ridier & Matthieu Carof, 2018. "SYNERGY: a bio economic model assessing the economic and environmental impacts of increased regional protein self-sufficiency," Post-Print hal-01937084, HAL.
    6. Greene, Catherine & Wechsler, Seth J. & Adalja, Aaron & Hanson, James, 2016. "Economic Issues in the Coexistence of Organic, Genetically Engineered (GE), and Non-GE Crops," Economic Information Bulletin 232929, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. da Rocha, Felipe Freitas & Bielschowsky, Ricardo, 2018. "China’s quest for natural resources in Latin America," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), December.
    8. Chaoping Xie & Jianfeng Gao & Jason H. Grant & Sven Anders, 2018. "Examining the Canada–China agri‐food trade relationship: Firms, trading partners, and trading volumes," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(4), pages 539-555, December.
    9. Brink, Lars & Orden, David, 2017. "The United States WTO Complaint on China’s Agricultural Domestic Support: Preliminary Observations (Paper)," Proceedings Issues, 2016: Climate Change and International Agricultural Trade in the Aftermath of COP21, December 11-13, 2016, Scottsdale, Arizona 253002, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Rebecca Taylor & David Zilberman, 2017. "Diffusion of Drip Irrigation: The Case of California," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(1), pages 16-40.
    11. Ting-Ting Sun & Chi-Wei Su & Ran Tao & Meng Qin, 2021. "Are Agricultural Commodity Prices on a Conventional Wisdom with Inflation?," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, August.
    12. Sven Anders & Wuyang Hu, 2018. "Introduction to the special issue on food consumption and marketing in Canada, the United States, and China: An intertwined system," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(4), pages 537-538, December.
    13. Xie, Chaoping & Marchant, Mary A., 2015. "Supplying China’s Growing Appetite for Poultry," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(A), pages 1-22, July.
    14. Han, Xue & Philip, Garcia, 2016. "GMO Contamination Price Effects in the U.S. Corn Market: StarLink and MIR162," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 236004, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Jian Zhang & Ashok K. Mishra & Peixin Zhu, 2021. "Land rental markets and labor productivity: Evidence from rural China," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(1), pages 93-115, March.
    16. Mendis, Sachintha & Hovhannisyan, Vardges, 2017. "Assessing Provincial-Level Demand For Food Quantity And Quality In China: An Easi Demand System Approach," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252797, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    17. Li Liu & Helen Ross & Anoma Ariyawardana, 2020. "Community Development through Supply Chain Responsibility: A Case Study of Rice Supply Chains and Connected Rural Communities in Central China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, January.
    18. Tianxiang Li & Tomas Baležentis & Lijuan Cao & Jing Zhu & Irena Kriščiukaitienė & Rasa Melnikienė, 2016. "Are the Changes in China’s Grain Production Sustainable: Extensive and Intensive Development by the LMDI Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-24, November.
    19. Beckman, Jayson & Dyck, John & Heerman, Kari, 2017. "The Global Landscape of Agricultural Trade, 1995-2014," Economic Information Bulletin 265270, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Gooch, Elizabeth & Gale, Fred, 2018. "China’s Foreign Agriculture Investments," Economic Information Bulletin 276237, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Crop Production/Industries;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iefi16:244523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilbonde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.