IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae09/50171.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Proposal for a territorial assessment of the effects of agricultural policies with a georeferred mathematical programming model: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Scozzafava, Gabriele
  • Casini, Leonardo

Abstract

Over the past fifteen years, the common agricultural policy (CAP) is profoundly changed under the pressure of European society and economic trends. The reforms of 2003-2004 marked a new phase in this path. This process continued with the reforms of the sugar (2006) and fruit and vegetables(2007) and is still ongoing with the recent proposals to reform the wine sector. The dynamics of consolidation, evaluation and redirection of the legislative measures adopted are very important and topical in view of the definition of the common agricultural policy. These issues on the political side emphasize the need for policy makers to have evaluative instruments witch can analyze both the effects on farmers behaviour and the effects generated in the territory. Using instrument that measures and localises the likely effects of agricultural policies, as a matter of fact, allows a correct and comprehensive analysis of actions taken, with the aim of bringing any corrections and adjustments to particular situation. The present work aims to implement and to test in a case study an evaluation instrument based on the integration of two different methodologies: the mathematical programming and the geographic information system. With this research we want to propose a possible method to study at the same time the behaviour of farmers and the localization of their choices under different political conditions. Farmers behaviour has been studied through the implementation of a positive mathematical programming (PMP) model. The construction of a georeferred database made possible to consider the spatial characteristics as variables directly involved in the process of mathematics optimization. Therefore, the geographic information system was used not only to locate the effects of policies, but also to constrain the mathematical model. The proposed model was applied in a rural area in the province of Florence, the Mugello. Through the comparison of different policy scenarios were identified and located the main effects induced by the mid term reform on soil, on livestock and on farms economic performance. Results obtained show how Cap reform induced a reallocation of farms resources and that it did not lead to the feared abandonment of primary activity. In addition, the elaboration of results provide important informations to decision public in order to develop monitoring actions in those areas which show potential problems. This model, for its flexibility and ductility, may constitute the basis for simulate and analyze the potential effects induced by the proposals, for example, in the health check of the CAP.

Suggested Citation

  • Scozzafava, Gabriele & Casini, Leonardo, 2009. "Proposal for a territorial assessment of the effects of agricultural policies with a georeferred mathematical programming model: a case study," 2009 Conference, August 16-22, 2009, Beijing, China 50171, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50171
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.50171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/50171/files/33_IAAE_09_scozzzafava-casini.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.50171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard E. Howitt, 1995. "Positive Mathematical Programming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(2), pages 329-342.
    2. Quirino Paris & Richard E. Howitt, 1998. "An Analysis of Ill-Posed Production Problems Using Maximum Entropy," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 80(1), pages 124-138.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Viaggi, Davide & Bartolini, Fabio & Raggi, Meri & Sardonini, Laura, 2010. "The role of the Common Agricultural Policy in the spatial location of agricultural activities," 116th Seminar, October 27-30, 2010, Parma, Italy 95242, European Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Britz, Wolfgang & Linda, Arata, "undated". "How Important Are Crop Shares In Managing Risk For Specialized Arable Farms? A Panel Estimation Of A Programming Model For Three European Regions," 56th Annual Conference, Bonn, Germany, September 28-30, 2016 244801, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    2. Kooten, G. Cornelis van, 2013. "Modeling Forest Trade in Logs and Lumber: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis," Working Papers 149182, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    3. Carpentier, Alain & Letort, Elodie, 2009. "Modeling acreage decisions within the multinomial Logit framework," Working Papers 211011, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    4. Msangi, Siwa & Howitt, Richard E., 2006. "Estimating Disaggregate Production Functions: An Application to Northern Mexico," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21080, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Jon Duan & G. Cornelis van Kooten & A. T. M. Hasibul Islam, 2023. "Calibration of Grid Models for Analyzing Energy Policies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Liu, Xuan & van Kooten, Gerrit Cornelis & Duan, Jun, 2020. "Calibration of agricultural risk programming models using positive mathematical programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 64(3), July.
    7. Louhichi, Kamel & Flichman, Guillermo & Blanco Fonseca, Maria, 2009. "A generic template for FSSIM," Reports 57463, Wageningen University, SEAMLESS: System for Environmental and Agricultural Modelling; Linking European Science and Society.
    8. Blanco Fonseca, Maria & Iglesias Martinez, Eva, 2005. "Modelling New EU Agricultural Policies: Global Guidelines, Local Strategies," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232644, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Kamel Louhichi & Hugo Valin, 2012. "Impact of EU biofuel policies on the French arable sector: A micro-level analysis using global market and farm-based supply models," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 93(3), pages 233-272.
    10. Fragoso, R. & Marques, C. & Lucas, M.R. & Martins, M.B. & Jorge, R., 2011. "The economic effects of common agricultural policy on Mediterranean montado/dehesa ecosystem," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 311-327, March.
    11. Petsakos, Athanasios & Rozakis, Stelios, 2015. "Calibration of agricultural risk programming models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(2), pages 536-545.
    12. Alain Carpentier & Elodie Letort, 2010. "Simple econometric models for short term production choices in cropping systems," Working Papers SMART 10-11, INRAE UMR SMART.
    13. Gocht, Alexander, 2005. "Assessment of Simulation Behavior of Different Mathematical Programming Approaches," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232598, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Weng, Weizhe & Cobourn, Kelly M. & Kemanian, Armen R. & Boyle, Kevin J. & Shi, Yuning & Stachelek, Joseph & White, Charles, 2020. "Quantifying Co-Benefits of Water Quality Policies: An Integrated Assessment Model of Nitrogen Management," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304667, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Filippo Arfini & Cristina Brasili & Roberto Fanfani & Mario Mazzocchi & Elisa Montresor & Quirino Paris, 2001. "Tools for evaluating EU agricultural policies: An integrated approach," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 10(1), pages 191-210, January.
    16. Henseler, Martin & Wirsig, Alexander & Krimly, Tatjana, 2005. "Development, Testing and Application of ACRE: An Agro-Economic Production Model on Regional Level," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24770, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Donati, Michele & Bodini, Diego & Arfini, Filippo & Zezza, Annalisa, 2013. "An integrated PMP model to assess the development of agro-energy crops and the effect on water requirements," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 2(3), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Mohammad Ali Asaadi & Seyed Abolghasem Mortazavi & Omid Zamani & Gholam Hassan Najafi & Talal Yusaf & Seyed Salar Hoseini, 2019. "The Impacts of Water Pricing and Non-Pricing Policies on Sustainable Water Resources Management: A Case of Ghorveh Plain at Kurdistan Province, Iran," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    19. Aldaya, Maite M. & Gutiérrez-Martín, Carlos & Espinosa-Tasón, Jaime & Ederra, Idoia & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2023. "The impact of the territorial gradient and the irrigation water price on agricultural production along the first phase of the Navarra Canal in Spain," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    20. Wolfgang Britz & Linda Arata, 2019. "Econometric mathematical programming: an application to the estimation of costs and risk preferences at farm level," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 50(2), pages 191-206, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae09:50171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.