IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eptddp/42824.html

Water Markets in Pakistan: Participation and Productivity

Author

Listed:
  • Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela
  • Sullins, Martha

Abstract

Water markets provide one of the most promising institutional mechanisms for increasing access to irrigation from groundwater, particularly for tenants and small farmers. While water markets are found in all provinces of Pakistan, they are most prevalent in canal irrigated areas of Punjab and in NWFP. This study reviews the emerging literature on water markets and uses farm-level survey data to examine the performance of groundwater markets, with particular emphasis on Faisalabad District in Punjab and Dir District in NWFP. Findings indicate that, while large landowners are more likely to own tubewells and pumps, smaller landowners and tenants are more likely to rely on purchases from other farmers' tubewells for access to groundwater. The distance over which water can be transported provides a limitation to water market sales, but lined watercourses increase the distance over which tubewell water can be sold. Contractual arrangements for water in the IFPRI study areas of Faisalabad and Dir districts include hourly charges, buyer providing the fuel plus a fee for wear and tear, and sharecropping for water. While all types of irrigation--canal, purchased groundwater, and own tubewell water--are shown to increase yields of wheat, groundwater has a higher impact than canal water, and water from own tubewells, which provides farmers with the greatest degree of control, has a greater effect on yields than purchased groundwater. Unreliability of access to purchased tubewell water was a problem for over half of water buyers in the study areas. This analysis indicates that purchasers are more likely to have unreliable access to groundwater if they buy water from small-capacity, electric-powered tubewells, if they are young and own little or no land. Policy measures to improve access to and reliability of groundwater through water markets include increasing the density of tubewells, especially by assisting small farmers to purchase tubewells; lining water delivery channels; and providing more reliable electrical power supply to rural areas. Further research is needed on how water markets work in less favorable environments, such as those with salinity, waterlogging, or falling water tables, and to identify policy interventions that are appropriate under each set of circumstances.

Suggested Citation

  • Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Sullins, Martha, 1994. "Water Markets in Pakistan: Participation and Productivity," EPTD Discussion Papers 42824, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:42824
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42824/files/eptdp04.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Byrnes, K.J., 1992. "Water Users Associations in World Bank-Assisted Irrigation Projects in Pakistan," Papers 173, World Bank - Technical Papers.
    2. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Binswanger, Hans P., 1994. "Markets in tradable water rights: Potential for efficiency gains in developing country water resource allocation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 22(11), pages 1613-1625, November.
    3. Bardhan, P K & Srinivasan, T N, 1971. "Cropsharing Tenancy in Agriculture: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 61(1), pages 48-64, March.
    4. M. Jamil Chaudhry, 1990. "The Adoption of Tubewell Technology in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 29(3 and 4), pages 291-303.
    5. Saleth, R. Maria, 1991. "Factors Affecting Farmers' Decision to Buy Groundwater: Empirical Evidence from the Indo-Gangetic Region," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 46(3), July.
    6. Athreya, V. B., 1991. "Rapporteur's Report on Land and Water Markets," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 46(3), July.
    7. Johnson, R., 1989. "Private tube well development in Pakistan's Punjab: review of past public programs/policies and relevant research," IWMI Books, Reports H005719, International Water Management Institute.
    8. Johnson, Robert, 1989. "Private tube well development in Pakistan's Punjab: review of past public programs/policies and relevant research," IWMI Books, International Water Management Institute, number 138626, January.
    9. Zulfiqar A. Gill & Rajan K. Sampath, 1992. "Inequality in Irrigation Distribution in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 31(1), pages 75-100.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meinzen-Dick, Ruth Suseela & Sullins, Martha, 1994. "Water markets in Pakistan: participation and productivity," EPTD discussion papers 4, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Watto, Muhammad, 2013. "Measuring Groundwater Irrigation Efficiency in Pakistan: A DEA Approach Using the Sub-vector and Slack-based Models," 2013 Conference (57th), February 5-8, 2013, Sydney, Australia 152204, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Asghar, Sobia & Tsusaka, Takuji W. & Jourdain, Damien & Saqib, Shahab E. & Sasaki, Nophea, 2022. "Assessing the efficiency of smallholder sugarcane production: The case of Faisalabad, Pakistan," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    4. Wichelns, Dennis, 1999. "An economic model of waterlogging and salinization in arid regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 475-491, September.
    5. Hadia Majid, 2022. "Drought, Farm Output and Heterogeneity: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of South Asian Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 32-56, April.
    6. Ruth Meinzen-Dick, 1993. "Performance of Groundwater Markets in Pakistan," The Pakistan Development Review, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, vol. 32(4), pages 833-845.
    7. Li, Man & Xu, Wenchao & Rosegrant, Mark W., 2016. "Irrigation, Risk Aversion, and Water Rights under Water Supply Uncertainty," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235753, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    8. Basanta Kumar Barmon, 2016. "Impacts of the Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation System on Modern Varieties of Paddy Production in Bangladesh: A Case Study of Jessore District," Bangladesh Development Studies, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), vol. 39(3-4), pages 77-104.
    9. Françeska Tomori & Erik Ansink & Harold Houba & Nick Hagerty & Charles Bos, 2024. "Market power in California's water market," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(3), pages 1274-1299, May.
    10. Mirza, Z. I. & Mehmood Ul Hassan & Bandaragoda, D. J., 2000. "From state to jointly managed irrigation systems: social mobilization and management transfer guidelines for large canal systems," IWMI Research Reports H027655, International Water Management Institute.
    11. R. Quentin Grafton & James Horne & Sarah Ann Wheeler, 2016. "On the Marketisation of Water: Evidence from the Murray-Darling Basin, Australia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(3), pages 913-926, February.
    12. Rosegrant, Mark W. & Ringler, Claudia, 1999. "Impact On Food Security And Rural Development Of Reallocating Water From Agriculture," EPTD Discussion Papers 97500, CGIAR, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Xiaojun Shan & Jun Zhuang, 2013. "Cost of Equity in Homeland Security Resource Allocation in the Face of a Strategic Attacker," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(6), pages 1083-1099, June.
    14. Amirova, Iroda & Petrick, Martin & Djanibekov, Nodir, 2022. "Community, state and market: Understanding historical water governance evolution in Central Asia," IAMO Discussion Papers 327298, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    15. Richard Hornbeck & Pinar Keskin, 2015. "Does Agriculture Generate Local Economic Spillovers? Short-Run and Long-Run Evidence from the Ogallala Aquifer," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 7(2), pages 192-213, May.
    16. Reto Foellmi & Urs Meister, 2012. "Enhancing the Efficiency of Water Supply—Product Market Competition Versus Trade," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 12(3), pages 299-324, September.
    17. Bajaj, Akshi & Singh, S.P. & Nayak, Diptimayee, 2022. "Impact of water markets on equity and efficiency in irrigation water use: A systematic review and meta-analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 259(C).
    18. Molden, David & Sakthivadivel, Ramasamy & Samad, Madar & Burton, Martin, 2005. "Phases of river basin development: the need for adaptive institutions," Book Chapters,, International Water Management Institute.
    19. R. Quentin Grafton & Clay Landry & Gary D. Libecap & Sam McGlennon & Robert O'Brien, 2010. "An Integrated Assessment of Water Markets: Australia, Chile, China, South Africa and the USA," NBER Working Papers 16203, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    20. Li, Yuanzhe & Xi, Tianyang & Zhou, Li-An, 2024. "Drinking water facilities and inclusive development: Evidence from Rural China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eptddp:42824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.