IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A generalized latent class logit model of discontinuous preferences in repeated discrete choice data: an application to mosquito control in Madison, Wisconsin


  • Brown, Zachary S.
  • Dickinson, Katherine L.
  • Paskewitz, Susan


Serial nonparticipation in nonmarket valuation using choice data is a pattern of behavior in which an individual always appears to choose the status quo or ‘no program’ alternative. From a choice modelling perspective serial nonparticipation may be viewed as belonging to a class of ‘discontinuous preferences,’ which also includes other behavioral patterns, such as serial participation (never choosing the status quo), as well as lexicographic preferences (e.g. always choosing the alternative with the greatest health benefit). Discontinuous preferences are likely to be especially relevant in the context of environmental goods, due to the lack of familiarity that individuals have with valuing these goods in markets. In the case of discrete choice data, logit-based choice models are ill-equipped for identifying such preferences, because conditional logit choice probabilities cannot take a value of zero or one for any finite parameter estimates. Here we extend latent class choice models to account for discontinuous preferences. Our methodological innovation is to specify for each latent class a subset of alternatives that are avoided with certainty. This results in class membership being partially observable, since we then know with certainty that an individual does not belong to a class if she selects any alternatives avoided by that class. We apply our model to data from a discrete choice experiment on mosquito control programs to reduce West Nile virus risk and nuisance disamenities in Madison, Wisconsin. We find that our ‘generalized latent class model’ (GLCM) outperforms standard latent class models in terms of information criteria metrics, and provides significantly different estimates for willingness-to-pay. We also argue that GLCMs are useful for identifying some alternatives for which valuation estimates may not be identified in a given dataset, thus reducing the risk of invalid inference from discrete choice data.

Suggested Citation

  • Brown, Zachary S. & Dickinson, Katherine L. & Paskewitz, Susan, 2015. "A generalized latent class logit model of discontinuous preferences in repeated discrete choice data: an application to mosquito control in Madison, Wisconsin," 2015 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 26-28, San Francisco, California 205613, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205613
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.205613

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. Thiene, Mara & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & De Salvo, Maria, 2012. "Scale and taste heterogeneity for forest biodiversity: Models of serial nonparticipation and their effects," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 355-369.
    2. Shonkwiler, John Scott & Shaw, W. Douglass, 1996. "Hurdle Count-Data Models In Recreation Demand Analysis," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(2), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2003. "A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logit," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 681-698, September.
    4. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555.
    5. Emily Lancsar & Jordan Louviere, 2006. "Deleting 'irrational' responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 797-811.
    6. Hess, Stephane & Stathopoulos, Amanda, 2013. "Linking response quality to survey engagement: A combined random scale and latent variable approach," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 1-12.
    7. Daniele Pacifico & Hong il Yoo, 2011. "LCLOGIT: Stata module to fit latent class conditional logit models via EM algorithm," Statistical Software Components S457313, Boston College Department of Economics, revised 17 Sep 2013.
    8. Edward Morey & Jennifer Thacher & William Breffle, 2006. "Using Angler Characteristics and Attitudinal Data to Identify Environmental Preference Classes: A Latent-Class Model," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 34(1), pages 91-115, May.
    9. Roger H. von Haefen & D. Matthew Massey & Wiktor L. Adamowicz, 2005. "Serial Nonparticipation in Repeated Discrete Choice Models," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(4), pages 1061-1076.
    10. Rungie, Cam M. & Coote, Leonard V. & Louviere, Jordan J., 2012. "Latent variables in discrete choice experiments," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 145-156.
    11. McConnell K. E., 1995. "Consumer Surplus from Discrete Choice Models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 263-270, November.
    12. Peter Boxall & Wiktor Adamowicz, 2002. "Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class Approach," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 23(4), pages 421-446, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. A. Banerji & Shyamal Chowdhury & Hugo De Groote & J. V. Meenakshi & Joyce Haleegoah & Manfred Ewool, 2018. "Eliciting Willingness†to†Pay through Multiple Experimental Procedures: Evidence from Lab†in†the†Field in Rural Ghana," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 66(2), pages 231-254, June.

    More about this item


    Environmental Economics and Policy; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Public Economics; Research Methods/ Statistical Methods;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea15:205613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.