IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pkl235.html

David Klinowski

Personal Details

First Name:David
Middle Name:
Last Name:Klinowski
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pkl235
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Department of Economics
College of William and Mary

Williamsburg, Virginia (United States)
http://www.wm.edu/economics/
RePEc:edi:decwmus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Articles Chapters

Articles

  1. Nicholas Sabin & David Klinowski & Felix Reed-Tsochas, 2026. "Punctuated decline of human cooperation," Nature, Nature, vol. 653(8116), pages 1110-1118, May.
  2. Katherine Coffman & David Klinowski, 2025. "Gender and Preferences for Performance Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 3497-3516, April.
  3. David Klinowski, 2025. "Voicing Disagreement in Science: Missing Women," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1743-1753, November.
  4. David Klinowski, 2021. "Reluctant donors and their reactions to social information," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.
  5. Katherine B. Coffman & David Klinowski, 2020. "The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(16), pages 8794-8803, April.
  6. Argo, Nichole & Klinowski, David & Krishnamurti, Tamar & Smith, Sarah, 2020. "The completion effect in charitable crowdfunding," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 17-32.
  7. Klinowski, David, 2019. "Selection into self-improvement and competition pay: Gender, stereotypes, and earnings volatility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 128-146.
  8. David Klinowski, 2018. "Gender differences in giving in the Dictator Game: the role of reluctant altruism," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 4(2), pages 110-122, December.

Chapters

  1. Shereen J. Chaudhry & David Klinowski, 2016. "Enhancing Autonomy to Motivate Effort: An Experiment on the Delegation of Contract Choice," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments in Organizational Economics, volume 19, pages 141-157, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Articles

  1. Katherine Coffman & David Klinowski, 2025. "Gender and Preferences for Performance Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 3497-3516, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Katharina Huesmann & Yero Samuel Ndiaye & Christian Waibel & Daniel Wiesen, 2026. "How the Design of Ranking Systems and Ability Affect Physician Effort," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 72(2), pages 1198-1213, February.
    2. Derek Rury & Ariel Kalil, 2026. "Interpreting Performance: Evidence on Signal Weighting in Human Capital Investment," Working Papers 2026-20, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
    3. Perihan O. Saygin & Garrison Pollard & Thomas Knight & Mark Rush, 2026. "Gender Biased Resistance to Harsh Feedback," Working Papers wpdea2510, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.

  2. David Klinowski, 2025. "Voicing Disagreement in Science: Missing Women," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 107(6), pages 1743-1753, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Bruns, Stephan B. & Doucouliagos, Anthony & Doucouliagos, Hristos & König, Johannes & Stanley, T.D. & Zigova, Katarina, 2026. "The delayed acceptance of female research in economics," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

  3. David Klinowski, 2021. "Reluctant donors and their reactions to social information," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Li, Jing, 2023. "I’m feeling lucky: How randomly drawn suggested donations affect donation choice," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    2. Janas, Moritz & Jordan, Michelle, 2024. "Cheap signaling of altruism," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    3. Eberhard Feess & Florian Kerzenmacher, 2026. "Sorting of trustees: the good and the bad stay in the game," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 81(1), pages 367-389, February.
    4. Friehe, Tim & Gerhards, Leonie & Weber, Franziska, 2025. "Keep them out of It! How information externalities affect the willingness to sell personal data online," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. David Masclet & David L. Dickinson, 2025. "Incorporating conditional morality into economic decisions," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 95-152, February.

  4. Katherine B. Coffman & David Klinowski, 2020. "The impact of penalties for wrong answers on the gender gap in test scores," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(16), pages 8794-8803, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Díez-Rituerto, Marina & Gardeazabal, Javier & Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro, 2026. "Gender differences in willingness to guess revisited: Heterogeneity in a high stakes professional setting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    2. Maddalena Davoli, 2023. "A, B, or C? Question Format and the Gender Gap in Financial Literacy," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0206, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    3. Santiago Pereda-Fernandez, 2026. "Assessing the effectiveness of workers' selection exams: the case of Banca d'Italia," Temi di discussione (Economic working papers) 1515, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Fu, Jingcheng & Zhang, Xing & Zhong, Songfa, 2025. "Hedging-based scoring rules for multiple-choice questions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    5. Ballis, Briana & Lusher, Lester & Martorell, Paco, 2022. "The effects of exam frames on student effort and performance," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. Anaya, Lina & Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro & Zamarro, Gema, 2022. "Understanding performance in test taking: The role of question difficulty order," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    7. Charness, Gary & Dao, Lien & Shurchkov, Olga, 2022. "Competing now and then: The effects of delay on competitiveness across gender," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 612-630.
    8. Devereux, Paul J. & Delaney, Judith, 2021. "Gender and Educational Achievement: Stylized Facts and Causal Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 15753, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    9. Laura Hospido & Nagore Iriberri & Margarita Machelett, 2024. "Gender gaps in financial literacy: a multi-arm RCT to break the response bias in surveys," Working Papers 2401, Banco de España.
    10. Heiko Karle & Dirk Engelmann & Martin Peitz, 2022. "Student performance and loss aversion," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 124(2), pages 420-456, April.
    11. Montolio, Daniel & Taberner, Pere A., 2021. "Gender differences under test pressure and their impact on academic performance: A quasi-experimental design," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 1065-1090.
    12. Pau Balart & Lara Ezquerra & Iñigo Hernandez-Arenaz, 2022. "Framing effects on risk-taking behavior: evidence from a field experiment in multiple-choice tests," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(4), pages 1268-1297, September.
    13. Griselda, Silvia, 2024. "Gender gap in standardized tests: What are we measuring?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 221(C), pages 191-229.
    14. Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Kamalini Ramdas & Alp Sungu, 2022. "Social impact operations at the global base of the pyramid," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(12), pages 4364-4378, December.
    15. Silvia Griselda, 2020. "Different Questions, Different Gender Gap: Can the Format of Questions Explain the Gender Gap in Mathematics?," 2020 Papers pgr710, Job Market Papers.
    16. Saygin, Perihan O. & Atwater, Ann, 2021. "Gender differences in leaving questions blank on high-stakes standardized tests," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Samuel D. Hirshman & Alexander Willén, 2025. "Does Increasing the Riskiness of Choices Widen Gender Gaps?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(8), pages 6880-6901, August.
    18. Iriberri, Nagore & Rey-Biel, Pedro, 2021. "Brave boys and play-it-safe girls: Gender differences in willingness to guess in a large scale natural field experiment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).

  5. Argo, Nichole & Klinowski, David & Krishnamurti, Tamar & Smith, Sarah, 2020. "The completion effect in charitable crowdfunding," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 17-32.

    Cited by:

    1. Bernard, Anna & Gazel, Marco, 2025. "In or out? Crowding effects in public goods with private gifts: Evidence from crowdfunding," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Anser, Muhammad Khalid & Usman, Muhammad & Boğan, Erhan & Dedeoğlu, Bekir Bora & Khalid, Adeel & Akhtar, Muhammad Waheed, 2025. "Exploring the impact of destination attachment on digitally-enabled crowdfunding for cultural heritage restoration in post-earthquake Türkiye," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    3. Hedieh Tajali & Piruz Saboury, 2025. "Why give if others will? Evidence of crowd-out in a crowdfunding platform," Edinburgh School of Economics Discussion Paper Series 322, Edinburgh School of Economics, University of Edinburgh.
    4. François Cochard & Emmanuel Peterle & Jean-Christian Tisserand, 2025. "Do Donation Ceilings Increase Contributions? Evidence from an Experimental Study," Working Papers 2025-06, CRESE.
    5. Luca Corazzini & Christopher Cotton & Enrico Longo & Tommaso Reggiani, 2021. "The Gates Effect in Public Goods Experiments: How Donations Flow to the Recipients Favored by the Wealthy," MUNI ECON Working Papers 2021-13, Masaryk University, revised Aug 2024.
    6. Anton Miglo, 2022. "Theories of Crowdfunding and Token Issues: A Review," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, May.
    7. Abderahman Rejeb & Karim Rejeb & Andrea Appolloni & Horst Treiblmaier & Mohammad Iranmanesh, 2025. "Uncovering the themes and trends in crowdfunding research using Latent Dirichlet Allocation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 75(3), pages 2033-2066, September.
    8. Cochard, François & Peterlé, Emmanuel & Tisserand, Jean-Christian, 2025. "Do donation ceilings increase contributions? Evidence from an experimental study," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    9. Corazzini, Luca & Cotton, Christopher S. & Longo, Enrico & Reggiani, Tommaso, 2024. "Coordinated selection of collective action: Wealthy-interest bias and inequality," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 238(C).
    10. Luca Corazzini & Christopher Cotton & Enrico Longo & Tommaso Reggiani, 2022. "Pro-Rich and Progressive: Policy Selection and Contributions in Threshold Public Goods Experiments," Working Paper 1471, Economics Department, Queen's University.
    11. Maja Adena & Steffen Huck, 2022. "Voluntary ‘donations’ versus reward-oriented ‘contributions’: two experiments on framing in funding mechanisms," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 25(5), pages 1399-1417, November.
    12. David Klinowski, 2021. "Reluctant donors and their reactions to social information," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.
    13. Christoph Bauer & Katie Spangenberg & Eric R. Spangenberg & Andreas Herrmann, 2022. "Collect them all! Increasing product category cross-selling using the incompleteness effect," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 713-741, July.
    14. Shen, Peng & Wang, Xincheng & Wang, Yinxiao & Wang, Yucheng & Yu, Chu A.(Alex) & Zhang, Shuhuai, 2026. "Air pollution exposure and donation to its victims: Evidence from online charitable giving," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).

  6. Klinowski, David, 2019. "Selection into self-improvement and competition pay: Gender, stereotypes, and earnings volatility," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 128-146.

    Cited by:

    1. Ifcher, John & Zarghamee, Homa, 2020. "Competitive Preferences among Asians in the U.S," IZA Discussion Papers 13913, IZA Network @ LISER.
    2. Claude DIEBOLT & Magali JAOUL-GRAMMARE, 2024. "Gendered Study Choice and Prestige of Professions: France in the Long 20th Century," Working Papers 05-24, Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC).
    3. Buser, Thomas & van den Assem, Martijn J. & van Dolder, Dennie, 2023. "Gender and willingness to compete for high stakes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 350-370.
    4. Baier, Alexandra & Davis, Brent & Jaber-Lopez, Tarek, 2024. "Gender, choice of task, and the effect of feedback on competition: An experiment," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Katherine Coffman & David Klinowski, 2025. "Gender and Preferences for Performance Feedback," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 3497-3516, April.
    6. Hernandez-Arenaz, Iñigo, 2020. "Stereotypes and tournament self-selection: A theoretical and experimental approach," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    7. Charness, Gary & Dao, Lien & Shurchkov, Olga, 2022. "Competing now and then: The effects of delay on competitiveness across gender," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 612-630.
    8. Adamus, Magdalena & Mikušková, Eva Ballová, 2020. "Gender-based wage discrimination and the backlash effect in recruitment and dismissal processes Experimental evidence from Slovakia," OSF Preprints 4y6uc, Center for Open Science.
    9. Demiral, Elif E. & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2024. "Competitiveness and Employability," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    10. Mourelatos, Evangelos & Zervas, Panagiotis & Lagios, Dimitris & Tzimas, Giannis, 2024. "Can AI Bridge the Gender Gap in Competitiveness?," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1404, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. García-Segarra, Jaume & Hernandez-Arenaz, Iñigo & Rey-Biel, Pedro, 2025. "Economic consequences of gender differences in behavior," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Apicella, Coren L. & Demiral, Elif E. & Mollerstrom, Johanna, 2020. "Compete with others? No, thanks. With myself? Yes, please!," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Ifcher, John & Zarghamee, Homa, 2020. "Do Nominations Close the Gender Gap in Competition?," IZA Discussion Papers 13852, IZA Network @ LISER.
    14. Christopher W. Gardiner & Eva Markowsky, 2025. "Gender and Performance Under Competitive Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies," CEPA Discussion Papers 94, Center for Economic Policy Analysis.
    15. John Ifcher & Homa Zarghamee, 2024. "Does Decision Making for Others Close the Gender Gap in Competition?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3510-3526, June.
    16. Halladay, Brianna & Landsman, Rachel, 2022. "Perception matters: The role of task gender stereotype on confidence and tournament selection," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 35-43.

  7. David Klinowski, 2018. "Gender differences in giving in the Dictator Game: the role of reluctant altruism," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 4(2), pages 110-122, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Godager, Geir & Hennig-Schmidt, Heike & Li, Jing Jing & Wang, Jian & Yang, Fan, 2021. "Does gender affect medical decisions? Results from a behavioral experiment with physicians and medical students," HERO Online Working Paper Series 2021:1, University of Oslo, Health Economics Research Programme.
    2. Argo, Nichole & Klinowski, David & Krishnamurti, Tamar & Smith, Sarah, 2020. "The completion effect in charitable crowdfunding," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 17-32.
    3. Thaler, Michael, 2021. "Gender differences in motivated reasoning," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 501-518.
    4. Halladay, Brianna & Landsman, Rachel, 2024. "Shame on me: Emotions and gender differences in taking with earned endowments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    5. Doñate-Buendía, Anabel & García-Gallego, Aurora & Petrović, Marko, 2022. "Gender and other moderators of giving in the dictator game: A meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 280-301.
    6. David Klinowski, 2021. "Reluctant donors and their reactions to social information," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(2), pages 515-535, June.
    7. Austermann, Christine & von Blanckenburg, Korbinian & Iseke, Anja & Tebbe, Eva, 2024. "Stereotypical behavior vs. expectations: Gender differences in a dictator game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. Kawamura, Tetsuya & Ogawa, Kazuhito & Osaki, Yusuke, 2025. "The differences in effects of social image by gender using risky dictator game experiments," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(3).

Chapters

  1. Shereen J. Chaudhry & David Klinowski, 2016. "Enhancing Autonomy to Motivate Effort: An Experiment on the Delegation of Contract Choice," Research in Experimental Economics, in: Experiments in Organizational Economics, volume 19, pages 141-157, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Cited by:

    1. Tomas Sjöström & Levent Ülkü & Radovan Vadovic, 2017. "Free to Choose: Testing the Pure Motivation Effect of Autonomous Choice," Carleton Economic Papers 17-11, Carleton University, Department of Economics.
    2. Idris Adjerid & Rachael Purta & Aaron Striegel & George Loewenstein, 2018. "Aggressive Economic Incentives and Physical Activity: The Role of Choice and Technology Decision Aids," Papers 1810.06698, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2018.
    3. Stephan Tontrup & Christopher Jon Sprigman, 2022. "Self‐nudging contracts and the positive effects of autonomy—Analyzing the prospect of behavioral self‐management," Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 594-676, September.
    4. Idris Adjerid & George Loewenstein & Rachael Purta & Aaron Striegel, 2022. "Gain-Loss Incentives and Physical Activity: The Role of Choice and Wearable Health Tools," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2642-2667, April.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, David Klinowski should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.