IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pth33.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ulrich Thiessen

Personal Details

First Name:Ulrich
Middle Name:
Last Name:Thiessen
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pth33
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
http://www.diw.de/programme/jsp/MA.jsp?uid=uthiessen&language=en
Koenigin Luise Str. 5 14195 Berlin
49-03-89789-346
Terminal Degree:1991 Department für Volkswirtschaftslehre; Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät; Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

DIW Berlin (Deutsches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung)

Berlin, Germany
http://www.diw.de/

: xx49-30-89789-0
xx49-30-89789-200
Mohrenstraße 58, D-10117 Berlin
RePEc:edi:diwbede (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Ulrich Thießen, 2011. "The Shadow Economy in OECD Countries: Panel-Data Evidence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1122, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  2. Ulrich Thießen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1031, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  3. Lev Freinkman & Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Ulrich Thießen, 2009. "Incentive Effects of Fiscal Equalization: Has Russian Style Improved?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 912, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  4. Ulrich Thießen & Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Boriss Siliverstovs, 2008. "Does Aging Influence Sectoral Employment Shares?: Evidence from Panel Data," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 785, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  5. Ulrich Thießen, 2007. "Aging and Structural Change," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 742, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  6. Ulrich Thießen, 2005. "Fiscal Federalism: Normative Criteria for Evaluations, Developments in Selected OECD Countries, and Empirical Evidence for Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 518, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  7. Ulrich Thießen & Paul R. Gregory, 2005. "Modelling the Structural Change of Transition Countries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 519, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  8. Ulrich Thießen, 2004. "Financial System Development, Regulation and Economic Growth: Evidence from Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 400, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  9. Ulrich Thiessen, 2001. "Fiscal Decentralisation & Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries," Economics Working Papers 001, European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes.
  10. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Banking Crises in Transition Countries - Theory and Empirical Evidence: The Case of Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 193, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  11. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Zum wirtschaftspolitischen Reformfortschritt der Ukraine und zur Konditionalität der westlichen Hilfe," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 192, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  12. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Fiscal Federalism in Western European and Selected Other Countries: Centralization or Decentralization? What Is Better for Economic Growth?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 224, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  13. Ulrich Thießen, 1996. "Schattenwirtschaft in Osteuropa: Das Beispiel der Ukraine," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 143, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
  14. Ulrich Thießen, 1994. "Credibility of Restrictive Policies and Low Unemployment in the Czech Republic," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 97, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

Articles

  1. Ulrich Thießen, 2011. "Schattenwirtschaft: Vorsicht vor hohen Makroschätzungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 91(3), pages 194-201, March.
  2. Siliverstovs, Boriss & Kholodilin, Konstantin A. & Thiessen, Ulrich, 2011. "Does aging influence structural change? Evidence from panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 244-260, June.
  3. Hans-Georg Petersen & Ulrich Thiessen, 2010. "Editors' Introduction: Shadow Economy in High Income Countries - Much Ado about Nothing?," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 413-419.
  4. Hans-Georg Petersen & Ulrich Thiessen & Pierre Wohlleben, 2010. "Shadow Economy, Tax Evasion, and Transfer Fraud - Definition, Measurement, and Data Problems," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 421-441.
  5. Ulrich Thiessen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 481-509.
  6. Georg Erber & Ulrich Thießen, 2009. "Gefahr für den Welthandel: Protektionismus durch institutionelle Reformen stoppen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 76(14), pages 228-234.
  7. Georg Erber & Ulrich Thießen, 2009. "International Trade under Threat: Stopping Protectionism Through Institutional Reforms," Weekly Report, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 5(15), pages 101-107.
  8. Christine Binzel & Tilman Brück & Lars Handrich & Ulrich Thießen, 2008. "Tabus verzögern Wirtschaftsreformen in Syrien," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 75(7), pages 69-74.
  9. Ulrich Thiessen & Paul Gregory, 2007. "Modeling Structural Change: An Application to the New EU Member States and Accession Candidates," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 5-35, August.
  10. Ulrich Thießen, 2007. "Perspektiven der Wirtschaftsbeziehungen der EU zu Russland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 74(16), pages 225-230.
  11. Ulrich Thiessen & Paul Gregory, 2007. "Modeling Structural Change: An Application to the New EU Member States and Accession Candidates," Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 5-35, August.
  12. Ulrich Thießen & Lars Handrich, 2006. "Syrien vor der Transformation," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(39), pages 529-533.
  13. Christine Binzel & Alexander M. Danzer & Hella Engerer & Franziska Holz & Alexander Muravyev & Aleksey Oshchepkov & Kati Schindler & Mechthild Schrooten & Ulrich Thießen & Nathalia Weißhaar & Georg Za, 2006. "Deutschlands EU-Ratspräsidentschaft: Chancen zur Gestaltung der Zukunftsfähigkeit Europas nutzen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(51/52), pages 729-738.
  14. Ulrich Thießen & Lars Handrich & Veronika Movchan, 2006. "Ukraine: Wachstumsprobleme und wirtschaftspolitische Herausforderungen," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(37), pages 513-519.
  15. Ulrich Thießen, 2006. "Reformen des Fiskalföderalismus in Russland," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(17), pages 215-221.
  16. Ulrich Thiessen, 2005. "Banking crises, regulation, and growth: the case of Russia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(19), pages 2191-2203.
  17. Maya Schmaljohann & Ulrich Thießen, 2005. "Deutsches Bildungssystem: zentrale Kontrolle und mehr Wettbewerb," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 72(21), pages 345-351.
  18. Ulrich Thießen, 2004. "Trotz Fortschritten noch deutlicher Anpassungsbedarf bei der Beschäftigungsstruktur der osteuropäischen EU-Länder und Beitrittskandidaten," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(51), pages 791-802.
  19. Tilman Brück & Herbert Brücker & Hella Engerer & Christian von Hirschhausen & Mechthild Schrooten & Dieter Schumacher & Ulrich Thießen & Harald Trabold, 2004. "EU-Osterweiterung: klare Herausforderungen, unberechtigte Ängste," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 71(17), pages 213-222.
  20. Ulrich Thießen, 2004. "Fiscal Federalism in Transition: Evidence from Ukraine," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-23, March.
  21. Ulrich Thießen, 2003. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 237-274, September.
  22. Ulrich Thießen, 2003. "Fiskalische Dezentralisierung und Wirtschaftswachstum in "reichen" OECD-Ländern: gibt es ein Optimum?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 70(23), pages 375-382.
  23. Thiessen, Ulrich, 2003. "The Impact of Fiscal Policy and Deregulation on Shadow Economies in Transition Countries: The Case of Ukraine," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 114(3-4), pages 295-318, March.
  24. Ulrich Thießen, 2003. "Finanzausgleich in der Ukraine: positive Effekte für das Wirtschaftswachstum," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 70(17), pages 282-289.
  25. Ulrich Thießen, 2001. "Machtlos gegen die Schattenwirtschaft? Das Beispiel Ukraine," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 68(51/52), pages 811-816.
  26. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Ukraine: Beschleunigt sich der Reformprozess nach dem Regierungswechsel?," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 67(4/5), pages 43-53.
  27. Ulrich Thießen, 1997. "Reformen des Steuersystems und der Sozialabgaben in den GUS-Ländern am Beispiel der Ukraine," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(49), pages 945-952.
  28. Ulrich Thießen, 1997. "Zur Reform des Steuersystems, der Sozialabgaben und der Staatsausgaben in Osteuropa: das Beispiel der Ukraine," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 66(3/4), pages 395-411.
  29. Ulrich Thießen, 1997. "Schattenwirtschaft in Osteuropa: das Beispiel der Ukraine," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(18), pages 334-340.
  30. Ulrich Thießen, 1996. "Außenwirtschaftliche Aspekte des Transformations- und Entwicklungsprozesses in der Ukraine," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 65(2), pages 219-234.
  31. Mechthild Schrooten & Ulrich Thießen, 1996. "Rußland und Ukraine: Bankensektor bleibt fragil," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 63(49), pages 794-804.
  32. Maria Lodahl & Ulrich Thießen, 1995. "Bulgarien: Anzeichen für ein Ende der Rezession," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 62(8), pages 188-198.
  33. Christian Weise, 1995. "EU-Politik zur Steigerung regionaler Wettbewerbsfähigkeit," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(2), pages 266-278.
  34. Ulrich Thießen, 1995. "Competitiveness of Central-Eastern European Countries," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 64(2), pages 279-302.
    RePEc:taf:eaeuec:v:49:y:2011:i:2:p:5-29 is not listed on IDEAS

Books

  1. Herbert Brücker & Hella Engerer & Ulrich Thießen, 2006. "Zuwanderung zum Zwecke der Erwerbstätigkeit im demographischen Wandel: Forschungsprojekt im Auftrag des Bundesamts für Migration und Flüchtlinge," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 25, number pbk25.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. Ulrich Thießen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1031, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Debuncification
      by chris dillow in Stumbling and Mumbling on 2012-12-28 20:35:29

Working papers

  1. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Ulrich Thießen, 2011. "The Shadow Economy in OECD Countries: Panel-Data Evidence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1122, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Misbah Kiani & Adeel Ahmed & Khalid Zaman, 2015. "Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches for measuring underground economy of Pakistan," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 295-317, January.

  2. Ulrich Thießen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1031, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Ulrich Thießen, 2011. "The Shadow Economy in OECD Countries: Panel-Data Evidence," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1122, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Bittencourt, Manoel & Gupta, Rangan & Stander, Lardo, 2014. "Tax evasion, financial development and inflation: Theory and empirical evidence," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 194-208.
    3. Seitz, Franz & Rösl, Gerhard & Bartzsch, Nikolaus, 2011. "Currency movements within and outside a currency union: The case of Germany and the euro area," Weidener Diskussionspapiere 30, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH).
    4. Rajeev K. Goel & Michael A. Nelson, 2016. "Robust Determinants of the Shadow Economy: An International Comparison," CESifo Working Paper Series 5873, CESifo Group Munich.
    5. Marcus Ruge, 2010. "Determinants and Size of the Shadow Economy - A Structural Equation Model," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 511-523.
    6. de Koker, Louis & Jentzsch, Nicola, 2013. "Financial Inclusion and Financial Integrity: Aligned Incentives?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 267-280.
    7. Yilmaz BAYAR, 2016. "Public governance and shadow economy in Central and Eastern European countries," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2016(27), pages 62-73, Decembre.
    8. Piotr Dybka & Michal Kowalczuk & Bartosz Olesinski & Marek Rozkrut & Andrzej Toroj, 2017. "Currency demandand MIMIC models: towards a structured hybrid model-based estimation of the shadow economy size," Working Papers 2017-030, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis.

  3. Lev Freinkman & Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Ulrich Thießen, 2009. "Incentive Effects of Fiscal Equalization: Has Russian Style Improved?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 912, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Michael Alexeev, 2016. "Fiscal Incentives in Federations: Russia and the US Compared," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 485-506, December.
    2. Alisher Akhmedjonov & Irina N. Il’ina & Carol S. Leonard & Zafar Nazarov & Evgenij E. Plisetskij & Elena S. Vakulenko, 2013. "Russia’s regions: governance and Well-being, 2000-2008," HSE Working papers WP BRP 42/EC/2013, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    3. Irina N. Ilina & Carol S. Leonard & Evgenij E. Plisetskij, 2014. "Russian Regional Resilience: Finance, Cooperation And Resource Abundance (A Case Study Of Khanty-Mansiysk)," HSE Working papers WP BRP 15/PA/2014, National Research University Higher School of Economics.

  4. Ulrich Thießen & Konstantin A. Kholodilin & Boriss Siliverstovs, 2008. "Does Aging Influence Sectoral Employment Shares?: Evidence from Panel Data," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 785, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Alfred Garloff & Carsten Pohl & Norbert Schanne, 2011. "Do smaller labour market entry cohorts really reduce German unemployment?," ERSA conference papers ersa10p658, European Regional Science Association.

  5. Ulrich Thießen, 2007. "Aging and Structural Change," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 742, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Ziga Cepar & Marjetka Troha, 2015. "Impact of Population Ageing on Education Level and Average Monthly Salary: The Case of Slovenia," Managing Global Transitions, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(3 (Fall)), pages 281-299.

  6. Ulrich Thießen, 2005. "Fiscal Federalism: Normative Criteria for Evaluations, Developments in Selected OECD Countries, and Empirical Evidence for Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 518, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Libman, Alexander, 2008. "Federalism and regionalism in transition countries: A survey," MPRA Paper 29196, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Lkhagvadorj, Ariunaa, 2010. "Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization in Mongolia," MPRA Paper 28758, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2010.

  7. Ulrich Thießen & Paul R. Gregory, 2005. "Modelling the Structural Change of Transition Countries," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 519, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Marija Beg & Martina Basarac Sertic & Ivo Druzic, 2017. "Determinants of Deindustrialisation in Developed European and Post-Communist Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(2), pages 93-106.

  8. Ulrich Thiessen, 2001. "Fiscal Decentralisation & Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries," Economics Working Papers 001, European Network of Economic Policy Research Institutes.

    Cited by:

    1. Neyapti, Bilin & Bulut-Cevik, Zeynep Burcu, 2014. "Fiscal efficiency, redistribution and welfare," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 375-382.

  9. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Banking Crises in Transition Countries - Theory and Empirical Evidence: The Case of Russia," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 193, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Abdur Chowdhury, 2003. "Banking Reform In Russia: A Window Of Opportunity?," William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 2003-601, William Davidson Institute at the University of Michigan.
    2. Mavrotas, George & Vinogradov, Dmitri, 2005. "Financial Sector Structure and Financial Crisis Burden: A Model Based on the Russian Default of 1998," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2005/09, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    3. Dmitri Vinogradov, 2003. "Macroeconomic evolution after a shock: the role for financial intermediation," Macroeconomics 0310007, EconWPA.
    4. Mavrotas, George & Vinogradov, Dmitri, 2007. "Financial sector structure and financial crisis burden," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 3(4), pages 295-323, December.
    5. Abdur Chowdhury, 2003. "Banking reform in russia: winds of change?," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 89-103.
    6. Dmitri Vinogradov, 2004. "Macroeconomic evolution aftera shock: the role of financial intermediation," Money Macro and Finance (MMF) Research Group Conference 2003 106, Money Macro and Finance Research Group.

  10. Ulrich Thießen, 2000. "Fiscal Federalism in Western European and Selected Other Countries: Centralization or Decentralization? What Is Better for Economic Growth?," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 224, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    Cited by:

    1. Lars P. Feld & Horst Zimmermann & Thomas Döring, 2004. "Federalism, Decentralization, and Economic Growth," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200430, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    2. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "Functional Decentralisation of Government Activity," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(3), pages 36-42, February.
    3. Stefan Voigt, 2011. "Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 205-256, January.
    4. Paul Hallwood & Ronald MacDonald, 2008. "A Review of the Empirical Evidence on the Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Efficiency: With Comments on Tax Devolution to Scotland," Working papers 2008-46, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    5. Fritz Breuss & Markus Eller, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Is there Really a Link?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(1), pages 3-9, October.
    6. Jorge Martínez Vázquez & Robert M. McNab, 2006. "Fiscal decentralization, macrostability and growth," Hacienda Pública Española, IEF, vol. 179(4), pages 25-49, September.
    7. Thushyanthan Baskaran & Lars P. Feld & Jan Schnellenbach, 2016. "Fiscal Federalism, Decentralization, And Economic Growth: A Meta-Analysis," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(3), pages 1445-1463, July.
    8. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Robert McNab, 2001. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0101, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    9. Stefan Voigt & Lorenz Blume, 2009. "The Economic Effects of Federalism and Decentralization - A Cross-Country Assessment," CESifo Working Paper Series 2766, CESifo Group Munich.
    10. Nikolay Patonov, 2013. "Local Fiscal Capacity in the New Members of the European Union: Is It Efficient?," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(1), pages 57-70.
    11. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "Dezentralisierung staatlicher Aktivitäten - ein internationaler Vergleich," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 56(16), pages 36-39, August.
    12. Aristovnik, Aleksander, 2012. "Fiscal decentralization in Eastern Europe: a twenty-year perspective," MPRA Paper 39316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Whitney Buser, 2011. "The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high-income OECD nations: an institutional approach," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-48, October.
    14. Thushyanthan Baskaran & Lars P. Feld & Jan Schnellenbach, 2014. "Fiscal Federalism, Decentralization and Economic Growth: Survey and Meta-Analysis," CESifo Working Paper Series 4985, CESifo Group Munich.
    15. Ehtisham Ahmad & Giorgio Brosio & Vito Tanzi, 2008. "Local Service Provision in Selected OECD Countries; Do Decentralized Operations Work Better?," IMF Working Papers 08/67, International Monetary Fund.
    16. Anwar Shah & Theresa Thompson & Heng-fu Zou, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: The Impact of Decentralisation on Service Delivery, Corruption, Fiscal Management and Growth in Developing and Emerging Market Economies: A Synthesis of Empirical Evi," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(1), pages 10-14, October.
    17. Ramiro Gil-Serrate & Julio López-Laborda, "undated". "Modelling Tax Decentralisation And Regional Growth," Working Papers 14-05 Classification-JEL , Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    18. Horváth, Gyula & Lóránd, Balázs, 2012. "Decentralizáció és gazdasági fejlődés. Az olasz példa
      [Decentralization and economic development. The case of Italy]
      ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1273-1298.
    19. Rigmar Osterkamp & Markus Eller, 2003. "How Decentralised Is Government Activity?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 1(1), pages 32-35, February.
    20. Lars P. Feld & Gebhard Kirchgässner & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2004. "Fiscal Federalism and Economic Performance: Evidence from Swiss Cantons," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200420, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    21. Alexeev, Michael & Mamedov, Arseny & Fomina, Evgenia & Deryugin, Alexander, 2017. "Influence of the Main Characteristics of Interbudgetary Relations on the Indicators of Economic Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation," Working Papers 031717, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    22. Fritz Breuss & Markus Eller, 2004. "The Optimal Decentralisation of Government Activity: Normative Recommendations for the European Constitution," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 27-76, March.

Articles

  1. Ulrich Thießen, 2011. "Schattenwirtschaft: Vorsicht vor hohen Makroschätzungen," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;German National Library of Economics, vol. 91(3), pages 194-201, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Seitz, Franz & Krueger, Malte, 2017. "The Blessing of Cash," International Cash Conference 2017 – War on Cash: Is there a Future for Cash? 162911, Deutsche Bundesbank.

  2. Siliverstovs, Boriss & Kholodilin, Konstantin A. & Thiessen, Ulrich, 2011. "Does aging influence structural change? Evidence from panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 244-260, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Alfred Garloff & Carsten Pohl & Norbert Schanne, 2013. "Do small labor market entry cohorts reduce unemployment?," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(15), pages 379-406, September.
    2. Shekhar Aiyar & Christian H Ebeke, 2016. "The Impact of Workforce Aging on European Productivity," IMF Working Papers 16/238, International Monetary Fund.
    3. Mollick, André Varella, 2012. "Income inequality in the U.S.: The Kuznets hypothesis revisited," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 127-144.
    4. Gindra Kasnauskiene & Karol Michnevic, 2017. "Contribution of increased life expectancy to economic growth: evidence from CEE countries," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 6(2), pages 82-99, November.

  3. Hans-Georg Petersen & Ulrich Thiessen & Pierre Wohlleben, 2010. "Shadow Economy, Tax Evasion, and Transfer Fraud - Definition, Measurement, and Data Problems," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 421-441.

    Cited by:

    1. Mai Hassan & Friedrich Schneider, 2016. "Modelling the Egyptian Shadow Economy: A Currency Demand and A MIMIC Model Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 5727, CESifo Group Munich.
    2. Mai HASSAN & Friedrich SCHNEIDER, 2016. "Modelling the Egyptian Shadow Economy: A MIMIC model and A Currency Demand approach," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 309-339, June.

  4. Ulrich Thiessen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 481-509. See citations under working paper version above.
  5. Ulrich Thießen & Lars Handrich, 2006. "Syrien vor der Transformation," DIW Wochenbericht, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 73(39), pages 529-533.

    Cited by:

    1. Tilman Brück & Christine Binzel & Lars Handrich, 2007. "Evaluating Economic Reforms in Syria: Final Report for the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ)," DIW Berlin: Politikberatung kompakt, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, volume 35, number pbk35.

  6. Ulrich Thiessen, 2005. "Banking crises, regulation, and growth: the case of Russia," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(19), pages 2191-2203.

    Cited by:

    1. Hasanov, Fakhri & Huseynov, Fariz, 2013. "Bank credits and non-oil economic growth: Evidence from Azerbaijan," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 597-610.

  7. Ulrich Thießen, 2004. "Fiscal Federalism in Transition: Evidence from Ukraine," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 1-23, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Boriss Siliverstovs & Ulrich Thiessen & Caroline Elliott, 2015. "Incentive effects of fiscal federalism: Evidence for France," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1017949-101, December.
    2. Olga Kupets, 2012. "Characteristics and Determinants of Internal Labor Mobility in Ukraine," World Bank Other Operational Studies 26804, The World Bank.

  8. Ulrich Thießen, 2003. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 24(3), pages 237-274, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Díaz Serrano, Lluís & Rodríguez Pose, Andrés, 2011. "Decentralization, happiness and the perception of institutions," Working Papers 2072/151812, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    2. Luis Diaz-Serrano & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2012. "Decentralization, Subjective Well-Being And The Perception Of Institutions," ERSA conference papers ersa12p586, European Regional Science Association.
    3. Lars P. Feld & Horst Zimmermann & Thomas Döring, 2004. "Federalism, Decentralization, and Economic Growth," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200430, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    4. Aslim, Erkmen Giray & Neyapti, Bilin, 2017. "Optimal fiscal decentralization: Redistribution and welfare implications," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 224-234.
    5. Monica Escaleras & Charles Register, 2012. "Fiscal decentralization and natural hazard risks," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 165-183, April.
    6. Ligthart, J.E. & van Oudheusden, P., 2011. "In Government We Trust : The Role of Fiscal Decentralization," Discussion Paper 2011-073, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    7. Fritz Breuss & Markus Eller, 2004. "Decentralising the public sector: Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: Is there Really a Link?," ifo DICE Report, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 2(1), pages 3-9, October.
    8. Jorge Martínez Vázquez & Robert M. McNab, 2006. "Fiscal decentralization, macrostability and growth," Hacienda Pública Española, IEF, vol. 179(4), pages 25-49, September.
    9. Diaz-Serrano, Luis & Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés, 2014. "Decentralization and the Welfare State: What Do Citizens Perceive?," MPRA Paper 54123, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Stoilova Desislava & Patonov Nikolay, 2012. "Fiscal Decentralization: Is It a Good Choice for the Small New Member States of the EU?," Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, De Gruyter Open, vol. 59(1), pages 125-137, July.
    11. Irena SZAROWSKÁ, 2014. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Development in Selected Unitary European Countries," European Financial and Accounting Journal, University of Economics, Prague, vol. 2014(1).
    12. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Mark Rider, 2005. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Comparative Study of China and India (2005)," International Center for Public Policy Working Paper Series, at AYSPS, GSU paper0519, International Center for Public Policy, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University.
    13. Julia Darby & Anton Muscatelli & Graeme Roy, 2002. "Fiscal federalism and Fiscal Autonomy: Lessons for the UK from other Industrialised Countries," Working Papers 2002_12, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    14. Michael Alexeev, 2016. "Fiscal Incentives in Federations: Russia and the US Compared," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 485-506, December.
    15. Zareh Asatryan & Lars P. Feld, 2013. "Revisiting the Link between Growth and Federalism: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," CESifo Working Paper Series 4357, CESifo Group Munich.
    16. Christian Leßmann, 2006. "Fiscal Decentralization and Regional Disparity: A Panel Data Approach for OECD Countries," ifo Working Paper Series 25, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    17. Pierre Salmon, 2013. "Decentralization and growth: what if the cross-jurisdiction approach had met a dead end?," Post-Print halshs-01228426, HAL.
    18. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Anne Krøijer, 2009. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in Central and Eastern Europe," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 387-417.
    19. Neyapti, Bilin, 2013. "Fiscal decentralization, fiscal rules and fiscal discipline," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 528-532.
    20. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Roberto Ezcurra, 2010. "Is fiscal decentralization harmful for economic growth? Evidence from the OECD countries," Working Papers 2010-09, Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales.
    21. Maria Teresa Balaguer-Coll & Diego Prior & Emili Tortosa-Ausina, 2010. "Devolution dynamics of Spanish local government," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 42(6), pages 1476-1495, June.
    22. Sanz Labrador, Ismael & Sanz-Sanz, José Félix, 2013. "Política fiscal y crecimiento económico: consideraciones microeconómicas y relaciones macroeconómicas," Macroeconomía del Desarrollo 134, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    23. Lessmann, Christian & Markwardt, Gunther, 2012. "Aid, Growth and Devolution," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 1723-1749.
    24. Jan K. Brueckner, 2005. "Fiscal Federalism and Economic Growth," CESifo Working Paper Series 1601, CESifo Group Munich.
    25. Maria Elkhdari & Babacar Sarr, 2018. "Decentralization, spending efficiency and pro-poor outcomes in Morocco," Working Papers halshs-01774949, HAL.
    26. Thornton, John, 2007. "Fiscal decentralization and economic growth reconsidered," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 64-70, January.
    27. Ezcurra, Roberto & Rodriguez-Pose, Andres, 2011. "Can the economic impact of political decentralisation be measured?," CEPR Discussion Papers 8211, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    28. Norman Gemmell & Richard Kneller & Ismael Sanz, 2013. "Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth: Spending Versus Revenue Decentralization," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 51(4), pages 1915-1931, October.
    29. Bodman, Philip & Campbell, Harry & Le, Thanh, 2012. "Public investment, taxation, and long-run output in economies with multi-level governments," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 1603-1611.
    30. Boadway, Robin & Tremblay, Jean-François, 2012. "Reassessment of the Tiebout model," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1063-1078.
    31. Jorge Martinez-Vazquez & Santiago Lago-Peñas & Agnese Sacchi, 2017. "The Impact Of Fiscal Decentralization: A Survey," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1095-1129, September.
    32. Hughes Hallett, Andrew & Scott, Drew, 2010. "Scotland: A New Fiscal Settlement," SIRE Discussion Papers 2010-23, Scottish Institute for Research in Economics (SIRE).
    33. Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz, 2005. "Fiscal Design and the Location of Economic Activity," ERSA conference papers ersa05p539, European Regional Science Association.
    34. Floriana Cerniglia & Riccarda Longaretti, 2013. "Federalism, education-related public good and growth when agents are heterogeneous," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 109(3), pages 271-301, July.
    35. Johann Bröthaler & Michael Getzner, 2011. "Fiscal Autonomy and Total Government Expenditure: An Austrian Case-study," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 17(2), pages 134-156, May.
    36. Hanes, Niklas, 2003. "Empirical Studies in Local Public Finance: Spillovers, Amalgamations, and Tactical Redistribution," Umeå Economic Studies 604, Umeå University, Department of Economics.
    37. Aristovnik, Aleksander, 2012. "Fiscal decentralization in Eastern Europe: a twenty-year perspective," MPRA Paper 39316, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    38. Whitney Buser, 2011. "The impact of fiscal decentralization on economics performance in high-income OECD nations: an institutional approach," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 31-48, October.
    39. Luca Agnello & Ricardo M. Sousa, 2014. "The Determinants of the Volatility of Fiscal Policy Discretion," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 35, pages 91-115, March.
    40. Smith, Heidi Jane M. & Revell, Keith D., 2016. "Micro-Incentives and Municipal Behavior: Political Decentralization and Fiscal Federalism in Argentina and Mexico," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 231-248.
    41. Philip Bodman & Kathryn Ford & Tom Gole & Andrew Hodge, "undated". "What Drives Fiscal Decentralisation?," MRG Discussion Paper Series 3009, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    42. Neyapti, Bilin, 2010. "Fiscal decentralization and deficits: International evidence," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 155-166, June.
    43. Jürgen von Hagen, 2007. "Institutionelle Gestaltung föderaler Systeme: Theorie und Empirie," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(2), pages 109-109, March.
    44. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Sylvia A R Tijmstra & Adala Bwire, 2009. "Fiscal decentralisation, efficiency, and growth," Environment and Planning A, Pion Ltd, London, vol. 41(9), pages 2041-2062, September.
    45. Carlos Usabiaga & E. Macarena Hernández-Salmerón, 2016. "Regional Growth and Convergence in Spain: Is the Decentralization Model Important?," EcoMod2016 9358, EcoMod.
    46. Boriss Siliverstovs & Ulrich Thiessen & Caroline Elliott, 2015. "Incentive effects of fiscal federalism: Evidence for France," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(1), pages 1017949-101, December.
    47. Benno Torgler & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2005. "The Determinants of Political Discussion: How Important are Audit Courts and Local Autonomy?," CREMA Working Paper Series 2005-28, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    48. Ronald MacDonald & Paul Hallwood, 2004. "The Economic Case for Fiscal Federalism in Scotland," Working papers 2004-42, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    49. Rainald Borck, 2011. "Federalism, Fertility, and Growth," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 113(1), pages 30-54, March.
    50. Monastiriotis, Vassilis & Psycharis, Yiannis, 2011. "Without purpose and strategy?: a spatio-functional analysis of the regional allocation of public investment in Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 38377, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    51. Cornelius Bähr & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Matthias Wrede, 2007. "Dezentralisierung in den EU-Staaten und räumliche Verteilung wirtschaftlicher Aktivitäten," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 8(2), pages 110-129, March.
    52. Nuta Alina Cristina & Nuta Florian Marcel, 2013. "Analiza Relatiei Dintre Descentralizarea Fiscala Si Cresterea Economica In Romania," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 2, pages 204-209, April.
    53. Oding, Nina & Savulkin, Lev & Yushkov, Andrey, 2016. "Fiscal Federalism in Russia through the Lens of Government Programs Implementation," Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 4, pages 93-114, August.
    54. Francis Amagoh & Aloysius Ajab Amin, 2012. "An Examination of the Impacts of Fiscal Decentralization on Economic Growth," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(6), pages 72-81, November.
    55. James Gallagher & Daniel Hinze, "undated". "Financing Options for Devolved Government in the UK," Working Papers 2005_24, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    56. Ramiro Gil-Serrate & Julio López-Laborda, "undated". "Modelling Tax Decentralisation And Regional Growth," Working Papers 14-05 Classification-JEL , Instituto de Estudios Fiscales.
    57. Lara, Carlos Icaza & Pezzini, Mario & Villarreal, Roberto & Garcilazo, Enrique & Davies, Andrew, 2009. "Institutional Reform:Improving the Effectiveness of Policy Delivery," MPRA Paper 16567, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    58. Thushyanthan Baskaran & Lars P. Feld, 2009. "Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in OECD Countries: Is there a Relationship?," CESifo Working Paper Series 2721, CESifo Group Munich.
    59. Horváth, Gyula & Lóránd, Balázs, 2012. "Decentralizáció és gazdasági fejlődés. Az olasz példa
      [Decentralization and economic development. The case of Italy]
      ," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1273-1298.
    60. Lars P. Feld & Gebhard Kirchgässner & Christoph A. Schaltegger, 2004. "Fiscal Federalism and Economic Performance: Evidence from Swiss Cantons," Marburg Working Papers on Economics 200420, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    61. Wempi Saputra, 2010. "The Choice of Tax Bases under Fiscal Federalism and the Unitary System," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(1), pages 219-233.
    62. Stefanescu, Răzvan & Dumitriu, Ramona, 2015. "Creşterea economică a României între 1980 şi 2013
      [The Economic Growth of Romania between 1980 and 2013]
      ," MPRA Paper 61592, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    63. Justina AV Fischer & Antonio Rodriguez-Andr�s, 2008. "Political institutions and suicide: A regional analysis of Switzerland," TWI Research Paper Series 33, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut, Universität Konstanz.
    64. Philip Bodman & Harry Campbell & Kelly-Ana Heaton & Andrew Hodge, "undated". "Fiscal Decentralisation, Macroeconomic Conditions and Economic Growth in Australia," MRG Discussion Paper Series 2609, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    65. Bartolini, David & Ninka, Eniel & Santolini, Raffaella, 2017. "Tax Decentralisation, Labour productivity and Employment," MPRA Paper 81070, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    66. Alexeev, Michael & Mamedov, Arseny & Fomina, Evgenia & Deryugin, Alexander, 2017. "Influence of the Main Characteristics of Interbudgetary Relations on the Indicators of Economic Development of the Subjects of the Russian Federation," Working Papers 031717, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    67. Philip Bodman & Kelly-Ana Heaton & Andrew Hodge, "undated". "Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth: A Bayesian Model Averaging Approach," MRG Discussion Paper Series 3509, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.
    68. Lkhagvadorj, Ariunaa, 2010. "Fiscal Federalism and Decentralization in Mongolia," MPRA Paper 28758, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised Mar 2010.
    69. Jones Philip & Soguel Nils, 2010. "Fiscal Federalism at the Ballot Box: The Relevance of Expressive Voting," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(3), pages 469-488, December.
    70. Lessmann, Christian & Markwardt, Gunther, 2009. "Aid, growth and decentralization," Dresden Discussion Paper Series in Economics 09/09, Technische Universität Dresden, Faculty of Business and Economics, Department of Economics.
    71. Fritz Breuss & Markus Eller, 2004. "The Optimal Decentralisation of Government Activity: Normative Recommendations for the European Constitution," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 27-76, March.
    72. Yushkov, Andrey, 2015. "Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 404-418.
    73. Andrews, Matthew, 2008. "Are One-Best-Way Models of Effective Government Suitable for Developing Countries?," Working Paper Series rwp08-014, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.

  9. Thiessen, Ulrich, 2003. "The Impact of Fiscal Policy and Deregulation on Shadow Economies in Transition Countries: The Case of Ukraine," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 114(3-4), pages 295-318, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Filer, Randall K. & Hanousek, Jan & Lichard, Tomáš & Torosyan, Karine, 2016. ""Flattening" the Tax Evasion: Evidence from the Post-Communist Natural Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 11229, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Alexander Libman & Janis N. Kluge, 2017. "Sticks or Carrots? Comparing Effectiveness of Government Shadow Economy Policies in Russia," Working Papers 364, Leibniz Institut für Ost- und Südosteuropaforschung (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies).
    3. Karine Torosyan & Randall K. Filer, 2012. "Tax Reform in Georgia and the Size of the Shadow Economy," Economics Working Paper Archive at Hunter College 439, Hunter College Department of Economics.
    4. Dominik Enste, 2010. "Regulation and shadow economy: empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 231-248, September.
    5. Miriam Bruhn, 2011. "Reforming Business Taxes : What is the Effect on Private Sector Development?," World Bank Other Operational Studies 11053, The World Bank.
    6. Dominik Enste, 2010. "Shadow Economy - The Impact of Regulation in OECD-countries," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 555-571.
    7. Ulrich Thiessen, 2010. "The Shadow Economy in International Comparison: Options for Economic Policy Derived from an OECD Panel Analysis," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 481-509.

Books

    Sorry, no citations of books recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 10 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-AGE: Economics of Ageing (3) 2007-12-15 2008-04-29 2009-01-03
  2. NEP-TRA: Transition Economics (3) 2005-11-12 2005-11-12 2009-08-08
  3. NEP-DEV: Development (2) 2001-10-22 2004-03-14
  4. NEP-EEC: European Economics (2) 2001-10-22 2011-05-24
  5. NEP-PKE: Post Keynesian Economics (2) 2004-03-14 2010-07-17
  6. NEP-CBA: Central Banking (1) 2011-05-24
  7. NEP-MAC: Macroeconomics (1) 2004-03-14
  8. NEP-MFD: Microfinance (1) 2004-03-14
  9. NEP-PBE: Public Economics (1) 2005-11-12
  10. NEP-PUB: Public Finance (1) 2001-10-22
  11. NEP-URE: Urban & Real Estate Economics (1) 2009-08-08

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ulrich Thiessen should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.