IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/pfo83.html
   My authors  Follow this author

George S Ford

Personal Details

First Name:George
Middle Name:S
Last Name:Ford
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfo83

Affiliation

(in no particular order)

Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Policy Studies

Washington, District of Columbia (United States)
http://www.phoenix-center.org/

(+1) 202.274.0235
(+1) 202.244-8257
5335 Wisconsin Avenue, NW, Suite 440, Washington, D.C. 20015-2034
RePEc:edi:phoenus (more details at EDIRC)

School of Business
Samford University

Birmingham, Alabama (United States)
http://www.samford.edu/business/




RePEc:edi:sbsamus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & Richard P. Saba & Richard A. Seals Jr., 2010. "Internet Use and Job Search," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2010-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.

Articles

  1. George Ford, 2011. "An investigation into the relationship of retail gas prices on oil company profitability," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(27), pages 4033-4041.
  2. Ford, George S., 2011. "Broadband expectations and the convergence of ranks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 213-219, April.
  3. George Ford & Thomas Koutsky & Lawrence Spiwak, 2011. "The Frontier of Broadband Adoption Across the OECD: A Comparison of Performance," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 111-123.
  4. Beard T. Randolph & Ford George S. & Spiwak Lawrence J, 2010. "The Pricing of Pole Attachments: Implications and Recommendations," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-27, August.
  5. George Ford & John Jackson & Sarah Skinner, 2010. "HAC standard errors and the event study methodology: a cautionary note," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(12), pages 1153-1156.
  6. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & Thomas M. Koutsky & Lawrence J. Spiwak, 2009. "Network neutrality and foreclosing market exchange," International Journal of Management and Network Economics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(2), pages 160-175.
  7. Ford, George S., 2007. "Does a municipal electric's supply of communications crowd out private communications investment? An empirical study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-478, May.
  8. George S. Ford & John D. Jackson & Audrey D. Kline, 2006. "Misleading Inferences from Panel Unit Root Tests: a Comment," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 508-511, August.
  9. George Ford & T. Randolph Beard, 2006. "Introduction: Issues in Empirical Merger Analysis," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 165-168.
  10. T. Randolph Beard & George Ford & Richard Saba, 2006. "An Econometric-Driven Merger Simulation: Considerations and Application," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 217-228.
  11. Richard Beil & George Ford & John Jackson, 2005. "On the relationship between telecommunications investment and economic growth in the United States," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 3-9.
  12. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & R. Carter Hill, 2005. "Fragmented Duopoly: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(6), pages 2377-2396, November.
  13. T. Beard & George Ford & R. Hill & Richard Saba, 2005. "The flow through of cost changes in competitive telecommunications: Theory and evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 555-573, October.
  14. Beard, T. Randolph & Ford, George S. & Koutsky, Thomas M., 2005. "Mandated access and the make-or-buy decision: the case of local telecommunications competition," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 28-47, February.
  15. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford, 2005. "Splitting the Baby: An Empirical Test of Rules of Thumb in Regulatory Price Setting," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 331-351, July.
  16. T. Randolph Beard & George Ford, 2005. "Are Unbundled and Self-supplied Telecommunications Switching Substitutes? An Empirical Study," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-181.
  17. George Ford & John Jackson, 2004. "Competition and investment in telecommunications," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(1), pages 71-71, March.
  18. George Ford & John Jackson, 2004. "Demand elasticities for international message telephone service," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(14), pages 1523-1527.
  19. George Ford & Barry Haworth & Audrey Kline, 2003. "Discrimination and minority ownership in radio broadcasting," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 359-371.
  20. Robert Ekelund & George Ford, 2002. "Preliminary evidence on unbundled elements demand in local telephony," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 30(4), pages 443-443, December.
  21. Hazlett Thomas W. & Ford George S., 2001. "The Fallacy of Regulatory Symmetry: An Economic Analysis of the 'Level Playing Field' in Cable TV Franchising Statutes," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, April.
  22. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & Mark Thornton, 2001. "The measurement of merger delay in regulated and restructuring industries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(8), pages 535-537.
  23. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & John Jackson, 2000. "Are Local TV Markets Separate Markets?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 79-97.
  24. George Ford & John Jackson, 2000. "Preserving Free Television? Some Empirical Evidence on the Efficacy of Must-Carry," Journal of Media Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14.
  25. Ekelund, Robert B, Jr & Ford, George S & Koutsky, Thomas, 2000. "Market Power in Radio Markets: An Empirical Analysis of Local and National Concentration," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 157-184, April.
  26. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & John Jackson, 1999. "Is Radio Advertising a Distinct Local Market? An Empirical Analysis," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 14(3), pages 239-256, May.
  27. George Ford & John Jackson, 1998. "On the interpretation of policy effects from estimates of simultaneous systems of equations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 995-999.
  28. Ekelund, Robert B, Jr & Ford, George S, 1997. "Nineteenth Century Urban Market Failure?: Chadwick on Funeral Industry Regulation," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 27-51, July.
  29. M. J. DRISCOLL & J. J. A. PLESSIS & J.L. Ford, 1983. "Monetary Aggregates and Economic Activity: Reply," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 51(2), pages 217-222, June.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Blog mentions

As found by EconAcademics.org, the blog aggregator for Economics research:
  1. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & Richard P. Saba & Richard A. Seals Jr., 2010. "Internet Use and Job Search," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2010-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.

    Mentioned in:

    1. Given free Internet to the unemployed
      by Economic Logician in Economic Logic on 2010-12-17 20:57:00

Working papers

  1. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & Richard P. Saba & Richard A. Seals Jr., 2010. "Internet Use and Job Search," Auburn Economics Working Paper Series auwp2010-07, Department of Economics, Auburn University.

    Cited by:

    1. Sergey Roshchin & Sergey Solntsev & Dmitry Vasilyev, 2017. "Recruiting and Job Search Technologies in the Age of Internet," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 11(4), pages 33-43.
    2. Alexander C. Lembcke, 2014. "Home Computers and Married Women's Labor Supply," CEP Discussion Papers dp1260, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.

Articles

  1. George Ford, 2011. "An investigation into the relationship of retail gas prices on oil company profitability," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(27), pages 4033-4041.

    Cited by:

    1. Valadkhani, Abbas & Babacan, Alperhan, 2014. "Modelling how much extra motorists pay on the road? A cross-sectional study of profit margins of unleaded petrol in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 179-188.

  2. Ford, George S., 2011. "Broadband expectations and the convergence of ranks," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 213-219, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Seri, Paolo & Bianchi, Annaflavia & Nicola, Matteucci, 2013. "Diffusion and usage of public e-services in Europe: An assessment of country level indicators and drivers," MPRA Paper 51240, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Li, Raymond & Shiu, Alice, 2012. "Internet diffusion in China: A dynamic panel data analysis," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 872-887.

  3. George Ford & Thomas Koutsky & Lawrence Spiwak, 2011. "The Frontier of Broadband Adoption Across the OECD: A Comparison of Performance," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 111-123.

    Cited by:

    1. Kyriakidou, Vagia & Michalakelis, Christos & Sphicopoulos, Thomas, 2013. "Assessment of information and communications technology maturity level," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 48-62.
    2. Liao, Chun-Hsiung & Lien, Chun-Yu, 2012. "Measuring the technology gap of APEC integrated telecommunications operators," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 989-996.

  4. Ford, George S., 2007. "Does a municipal electric's supply of communications crowd out private communications investment? An empirical study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-478, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Ben Ammar, Semir & Eling, Martin, 2015. "Common risk factors of infrastructure investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 257-273.

  5. George S. Ford & John D. Jackson & Audrey D. Kline, 2006. "Misleading Inferences from Panel Unit Root Tests: a Comment," Review of International Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 508-511, August.

    Cited by:

    1. Lau, Chi Keung Marco & Suvankulov, Farrukh & Su, Yongyang & Chau, Frankie, 2012. "Some cautions on the use of nonlinear panel unit root tests: Evidence from a modified series-specific non-linear panel unit-root test," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 810-816.
    2. Eberhardt, Markus & Teal, Francis, 2009. "Econometrics for Grumblers: A New Look at the Literature on Cross-Country Growth Empirics," MPRA Paper 15813, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  6. Richard Beil & George Ford & John Jackson, 2005. "On the relationship between telecommunications investment and economic growth in the United States," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 3-9.

    Cited by:

    1. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Norman, Neville R. & Bele, Samadhan K., 2014. "Economic growth and the development of telecommunications infrastructure in the G-20 countries: A panel-VAR approach," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 634-649.
    2. Sang H. Lee & John Levendis & Luis Gutierrez, 2009. "Telecommunications and economic growth: an empirical analysis of sub-saharan Africa," DOCUMENTOS DE TRABAJO 005512, UNIVERSIDAD DEL ROSARIO.
    3. Luiggi Donayre & Ariuna Taivan, 2017. "Causality between Public Debt and Real Growth in the OECD: A Country-by-country Analysis," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 36(2), pages 156-170, June.
    4. Shahiduzzaman, Md. & Alam, Khorshed, 2014. "The long-run impact of Information and Communication Technology on economic output: The case of Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 623-633.
    5. Sajal Ghosh & Rohit Prasad, 2012. "Telephone penetrations and economic growth: evidence from India," Netnomics, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 25-43, April.
    6. Pradhan, Rudra P. & Arvin, Mak B. & Hall, John H., 2016. "Economic growth, development of telecommunications infrastructure, and financial development in Asia, 1991–2012," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 25-38.
    7. Ari VAN ASSCHE & Denise KONAN, "undated". "Assessing the Benefits of Telecommunications Liberalization to Tunisia," EcoMod2004 330600148, EcoMod.
    8. Shahiduzzaman, Md. & Alam, Khorshed, 2014. "Information technology and its changing roles to economic growth and productivity in Australia," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 125-135.
    9. Hong, Jae-pyo, 2017. "Causal relationship between ICT R&D investment and economic growth in Korea," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 70-75.

  7. T. Randolph Beard & George S. Ford & R. Carter Hill, 2005. "Fragmented Duopoly: A Conceptual and Empirical Investigation," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 78(6), pages 2377-2396, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Dimitra Petropoulou, 2008. "Competing for Contacts: Network Competition, Trade Intermediation and Fragmented Duopoly," CEP Discussion Papers dp0854, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    2. Crawford, Gregory S & Yurukoglu, Ali, 2011. "The Welfare Effects of Bundling in Multichannel Television Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 8370, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. T. Randolph Beard & Michael L. Stern, 2008. "CONTINUOUS CROSS SUBSIDIES AND QUANTITY RESTRICTIONS -super-," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 840-861, December.
    4. Petropoulou, Dimitra, 2008. "Competing for contacts: network competition, trade intermediation and fragmented duopoly," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 19630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

  8. T. Beard & George Ford & R. Hill & Richard Saba, 2005. "The flow through of cost changes in competitive telecommunications: Theory and evidence," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 555-573, October.

    Cited by:

    1. T. Randolph Beard & Michael L. Stern, 2008. "CONTINUOUS CROSS SUBSIDIES AND QUANTITY RESTRICTIONS -super-," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 840-861, December.
    2. Simran Kahai & David Kaserman, 2007. "Effective regulation versus tacit collusion in the long-distance market: an empirical analysis," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 247-257, December.

  9. Beard, T. Randolph & Ford, George S. & Koutsky, Thomas M., 2005. "Mandated access and the make-or-buy decision: the case of local telecommunications competition," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 28-47, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Ford, George S., 2007. "Does a municipal electric's supply of communications crowd out private communications investment? An empirical study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-478, May.
    2. T. Randolph Beard & Jeffrey Thomas Macher & Chris Vickers, 2016. "This Time is Different (?): Telecommunications Unbundling and Lessons for Railroad Regulation," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 49(2), pages 289-310, September.

  10. T. Randolph Beard & George Ford, 2005. "Are Unbundled and Self-supplied Telecommunications Switching Substitutes? An Empirical Study," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 163-181.

    Cited by:

    1. Ford, George S., 2007. "Does a municipal electric's supply of communications crowd out private communications investment? An empirical study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 467-478, May.

  11. George Ford & John Jackson, 2004. "Competition and investment in telecommunications," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 32(1), pages 71-71, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Parsons, Steve G., 2014. "Using the Hicks formula to evaluate an estimate of the elasticity of derived demand for toll-free numbers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 210-215.
    2. Beard, T. Randolph & Ford, George S. & Koutsky, Thomas M., 2005. "Mandated access and the make-or-buy decision: the case of local telecommunications competition," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 28-47, February.

  12. George Ford & John Jackson, 2004. "Demand elasticities for international message telephone service," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(14), pages 1523-1527.

    Cited by:

    1. Mayo, John W. & Ukhaneva, Olga, 2017. "International telecommunications demand," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 26-35.
    2. Madden, Gary G & Savage, Scott J & Tipping, Craig, 2001. "Understanding European Union international message telephone services demand," MPRA Paper 10918, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. James Alleman & Gary Madden & Scott Savage, 2003. "Dominant carrier market power in US international telephone markets," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(6), pages 665-673.
    4. Madden, Gary & Savage, Scott J. & Coble-Neal, Grant, 2002. "Forecasting United States-Asia international message telephone service," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 523-543.

  13. Hazlett Thomas W. & Ford George S., 2001. "The Fallacy of Regulatory Symmetry: An Economic Analysis of the 'Level Playing Field' in Cable TV Franchising Statutes," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, April.

    Cited by:

    1. James E. Prieger, 2005. "Endogenous Regulatory Delay and the Timing of Product Innovation," Working Papers 54, University of California, Davis, Department of Economics.
    2. James Prieger, 2008. "Product innovation, signaling, and endogenous regulatory delay," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 95-118, October.

  14. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & Mark Thornton, 2001. "The measurement of merger delay in regulated and restructuring industries," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(8), pages 535-537.

    Cited by:

    1. Aleksander Buczek, 2016. "The time to completion of a legal merger: General concepts, statistical analysis and the case of Poland," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Technology, Institute of Organization and Management, vol. 1, pages 19-44.

  15. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & John Jackson, 2000. "Are Local TV Markets Separate Markets?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(1), pages 79-97.

    Cited by:

    1. Alvin Silk & Lisa Klein & Ernst Berndt, 2002. "Intermedia Substitutability and Market Demand by National Advertisers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 20(4), pages 323-348, June.
    2. Ivaldi, Marc & Zhang, Jiekai, 2015. "Advertising Competition in the French Free-To-Air Television Broadcasting Industry," CEPR Discussion Papers 10762, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Marc Ivaldi & Jiekai Zhang, 2017. "Advertising Competition in the Free-to-Air TV Broadcasting Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 6461, CESifo Group Munich.
    4. Kasuga, Norihiro & Shishikura, Manabu, 2006. "Determinants of profit in the broadcasting industry: Evidence from Japanese micro data," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 216-228, June.

  16. Ekelund, Robert B, Jr & Ford, George S & Koutsky, Thomas, 2000. "Market Power in Radio Markets: An Empirical Analysis of Local and National Concentration," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 157-184, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Howard Smith & Catherine O'Gorman, 2008. "Efficiency Gain from Ownership Deregulation: Estimates for the Radio Industry," Economics Series Working Papers 385, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Kasuga, Norihiro & Shishikura, Manabu, 2006. "Determinants of profit in the broadcasting industry: Evidence from Japanese micro data," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 216-228, June.
    3. Dennis Halcoussis & Anton Lowenberg, 2003. "The quantity and quality of radio broadcasting: are small markets underprovided?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 347-357.

  17. Robert Ekelund & George Ford & John Jackson, 1999. "Is Radio Advertising a Distinct Local Market? An Empirical Analysis," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 14(3), pages 239-256, May.

    Cited by:

    1. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2000. "Market Provision of Public Goods: The Case of Broadcasting," NBER Working Papers 7513, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Czygan, Marco, 1999. "Wohin kann Wettbewerb im Hörfunk führen? Industrieökonomische Analyse des Hörfunksystems der USA und Vergleich mit Deutschenland," Ilmenau Economics Discussion Papers 18, Ilmenau University of Technology, Institute of Economics.
    3. Willem H. Boshoff, 2011. "Antitrust market definition using statistical learning techniques and consumer characteristics," Working Papers 224, Economic Research Southern Africa.
    4. Anderson, Simon P & Gabszewicz, Jean Jaskold, 2005. "The Media and Advertising: A Tale of Two-Sided Markets," CEPR Discussion Papers 5223, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Simon P. Anderson & Stephen Coate, 2003. "Market Provision of Broadcasting: A Welfare Analysis," Virginia Economics Online Papers 358, University of Virginia, Department of Economics.
    6. Alvin Silk & Lisa Klein & Ernst Berndt, 2002. "Intermedia Substitutability and Market Demand by National Advertisers," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 20(4), pages 323-348, June.
    7. Kasuga, Norihiro & Shishikura, Manabu, 2006. "Determinants of profit in the broadcasting industry: Evidence from Japanese micro data," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 216-228, June.
    8. Evan Kwerel & Johathan Levy & Robert Pepper & David Sappington & Donald Stockdale & John Williams, 2002. "Economic Issues at the Federal Communications Commission," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 21(4), pages 337-356, December.
    9. Dennis Halcoussis & Anton Lowenberg, 2003. "The quantity and quality of radio broadcasting: are small markets underprovided?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 347-357.
    10. Ekelund, Robert B, Jr & Ford, George S & Koutsky, Thomas, 2000. "Market Power in Radio Markets: An Empirical Analysis of Local and National Concentration," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 43(1), pages 157-184, April.
    11. Javier Elizalde, 2011. "Market Definition with Differentiated Products: A Spatial Competition Application," Faculty Working Papers 07/11, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.

  18. George Ford & John Jackson, 1998. "On the interpretation of policy effects from estimates of simultaneous systems of equations," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(8), pages 995-999.

    Cited by:

    1. Peter Calcagno & Monica Escaleras, 2006. "Party Alternation, Divided Government, and Fiscal Performance within U.S. States," Working Papers 06006, Department of Economics, College of Business, Florida Atlantic University, revised Dec 2006.
    2. Mónica López-Puertas Lamy, 2012. "How does Ownership Structure Influence Bank Risk? Analyzing the Role of Managerial Incentives," Working Papers 1208, Departament Empresa, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, revised Nov 2012.
    3. Tatum, Shaun W. & Skinner, Sarah J. & Jackson, John D., 2010. "On the economic sustainability of ethanol E85," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1263-1267, November.

  19. Ekelund, Robert B, Jr & Ford, George S, 1997. "Nineteenth Century Urban Market Failure?: Chadwick on Funeral Industry Regulation," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 27-51, July.

    Cited by:

    1. Thierry Blayac & Patrice Bougette & Christian Montet, 2014. "How consumer information curtails market power in the funeral industry," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 421-437, June.
    2. Sandmo, Agnar, 2014. "The early history of environmental economics," Discussion Paper Series in Economics 10/2014, Norwegian School of Economics, Department of Economics.
    3. Robert B. Ekelund Jr & Edward O. Price III, 2012. "The Economics of Edwin Chadwick," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14915.
    4. David Yoskowitz, 2002. "Price Dispersion and Price Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from a Spot Market for Water," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 20(3), pages 283-289, May.
    5. Alison Cathles & David E. Harrington & Kathy Krynski, 2010. "The Gender Gap in Funeral Directors: Burying Women with Ready-to-Embalm Laws?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 48(4), pages 688-705, December.
    6. Ekelund, Robert B. & Dorton, Cheryl, 2003. "Criminal justice institutions as a common pool: the 19th century analysis of Edwin Chadwick," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 271-294, March.
    7. Harrington, David E & Krynski, Kathy J, 2002. "The Effect of State Funeral Regulations on Cremations Rates: Testing for Demand Inducement in Funeral Markets," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 45(1), pages 199-225, April.
    8. Daniel Sutter, 2005. "State Regulations and E-Commerce: The Case for Internet Casket Sales in Oklahoma," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 20(Spring 20), pages 27-42.
    9. David E. Harrington, 2007. "Markets: Preserving Funeral Markets with Ready-to-Embalm Laws," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 21(4), pages 201-216, Fall.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-ICT: Information & Communication Technologies (1) 2010-11-20
  2. NEP-LAB: Labour Economics (1) 2010-11-20

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, George S Ford should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.