IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v45y2021i5s0308596121000422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing the Economics of the Net Neutrality Debate: A comment

Author

Listed:
  • Ford, George S.

Abstract

•Editors of this journal issued an Expression of Concern on a 2019 paper, Testing the Economics of the Net Neutrality Debate.•The Expression of Concern did not address additional and fatal flaws with the paper.•The data used in the paper did not measure capital expenditures but an accrual of the delayed payment of past expenditures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ford, George S., 2021. "Testing the Economics of the Net Neutrality Debate: A comment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(5).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:45:y:2021:i:5:s0308596121000422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596121000422
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2021.102137?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. George S. Ford, 2018. "Regulation and investment in the U.S. telecommunications industry," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(56), pages 6073-6084, December.
    2. Ford George S., 2018. "Net Neutrality and Investment in the US: A Review of Evidence from the 2018 Restoring Internet Freedom Order," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 175-205, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Stocker, Volker & Stockhammer, Paul, 2019. "Ist Netzneutralität tatsächlich gut? Eine Neubewertung vor dem Hintergrund der Regulierung in den USA und in der EU sowie aktueller Forschungsergebnisse," Policy Notes 38, EcoAustria – Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Briglauer, Wolfgang & Köppl-Turyna, Monika & Schwarzbauer, Wolfgang & Bittó, Virág, 2023. "Evaluating the effects of ICT core elements on CO2 emissions: Recent evidence from OECD countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).
    3. Xi Wang & Jewoo Kim & Jaewook Kim & Yoon Koh, 2024. "Application of Natural-Resource-Based View to Nature-Based Tourism Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    4. Wolfgang Briglauer & Carlo Cambini & Klaus Gugler & Volker Stocker, 2023. "Net neutrality and high-speed broadband networks: evidence from OECD countries," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(3), pages 533-571, June.
    5. Ford George S., 2018. "Net Neutrality and Investment in the US: A Review of Evidence from the 2018 Restoring Internet Freedom Order," Review of Network Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 17(3), pages 175-205, September.
    6. Jerry Ellig & Paul LaFontaine & Wayne Leighton & Eric Ralph & Sean Sullivan, 2018. "Economics at the FCC, 2017–2018: Internet Freedom, International Broadband Pricing Comparisons, and a New Office of Economics and Analytics," Review of Industrial Organization, Springer;The Industrial Organization Society, vol. 53(4), pages 681-707, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:45:y:2021:i:5:s0308596121000422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.