IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/d/dhanuau.html

Publications

by members of

Australian National University → Research School of Population Health → Department of Health Services Research and Policy

These are publications listed in RePEc written by members of the above institution who are registered with the RePEc Author Service. Thus this compiles the works all those currently affiliated with this institution, not those affilated at the time of publication. List of registered members. Register yourself. Citation analysis. This page is updated in the first days of each month.
| Working papers | Journal articles | Chapters |

Working papers

2020

  1. Li, Jinhu & Menon, Nidhiya, 2020, "Echo Effects of Early-Life Health Shocks: The Intergenerational Consequences of Prenatal Malnutrition during the Great Leap Forward Famine in China," IZA Discussion Papers, IZA Network @ LISER, number 13171, Apr.

2017

  1. Zack Dorner & Emily Lancsar, 2017, "Intrinsic motivation, health outcomes and the crowding out effect of temporary extrinsic incentives: A lab-in-the-field experiment," Monash Economics Working Papers, Monash University, Department of Economics, number 18-17, Apr.

2016

  1. Cam Donaldson & Rachel Baker & Helen Mason & Mark Pennington & Sue Bell & Michael Jones-Lee & John Wildman & Emily Lancsar & Angela Robinson & Phil Bacon & Jan Abel Olsen & Dorte Gyrd-Hansen & Trine K, 2016, "From representing views to representativeness of views: Illustrating a new (Q2S) approach in the context of health care priority setting in nine European countries," Post-Print, HAL, number hal-01928064, Oct, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.036.
  2. Barbara Broadway & Guyonne Kalb & Jinhu Li & Anthony Scott, 2016, "Do Financial Incentives Influence GPs’ Decisions to Do After-Hours Work? A Discrete Choice Labour Supply Model," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, number wp2016n12, Mar.

2014

  1. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2014, "The Dynamics of Depression from Adolescence to Early Adulthood," Department of Economics Working Papers, McMaster University, number 2014-09, Sep.

2013

  1. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2013, "Family Socio-Economic Status, Childhood Life-Events and the Dynamics of Depression from Adolescence to Early Adulthood," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne, number wp2013n11, Mar.

2011

  1. Jeremiah Hurley & Phil DeCicca & Jinhu Li & Gioia Buckley, 2011, "The Response of Ontario Primary Care Physicians to Pay-for-Performance Incentives," Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper Series, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (CHEPA), McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada, number 2011-02.
  2. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2011, "Physician Response to Pay-for-Performance: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," NBER Working Papers, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number 16909, Mar.

2010

  1. Odejar, Maria & Baker, Rachel & Ryan, Mandy & Donalson, Cam & Bateman, Ian J. & Jones-Lee, M & Lancsar, Emily & Mason, Helen & Pinto Paredes, JL & Robinson, A & Shackley, P & Smith, R & Sugdem, R & Wi, 2010, "Weighting and valuing quality-adjusted life-years using stated preference methods: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project," MPRA Paper, University Library of Munich, Germany, number 108869, May.

2003

  1. Patsy Kenny & Ajsa Mahmic & Emily Lancsar & Rob Anderson & Madeleine King & Jane Hall, 2003, "Diaries or questionnaires for collecting self-reported healthcare utilisation and patient cost data? CHERE Project Report No 20," Research Reports, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney, number 20, Apr.

2002

  1. Emily Lancsar, 2002, "Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments, CHERE Discussion Paper No 48," Discussion Papers, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney, number 48, Aug.
  2. Bronwyn Lind & Don Weatherburn & Shuling Chen & Marian Shanahan & Emily Lancsar & Marion Haas, 2002, "New South Wales drug court evaluation: Cost-effectiveness, CHERE Project Report 17a," Research Reports, CHERE, University of Technology, Sydney, number 17a, Feb.

Journal articles

2023

  1. Law, Hsei Di & Marasinghe, Dinith & Butler, Danielle & Welsh, Jennifer & Lancsar, Emily & Banks, Emily & Biddle, Nicholas & Korda, Rosemary, 2023, "Progressivity of out-of-pocket costs under Australia's universal health care system: A national linked data study," Health Policy, Elsevier, volume 127, issue C, pages 44-50, DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.10.010.
  2. Dorner, Zack & Lancsar, Emily, 2023, "Don’t pay the highly motivated too much," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, volume 103, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2022.101972.
  3. Joseph Kwon & Sarah Smith & Rakhee Raghunandan & Martin Howell & Elisabeth Huynh & Sungwook Kim & Thomas Bentley & Nia Roberts & Emily Lancsar & Kirsten Howard & Germaine Wong & Jonathan Craig & Stavr, 2023, "Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, volume 21, issue 4, pages 559-584, July, DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00806-8.
  4. Richard Norman & Brendan Mulhern & Emily Lancsar & Paula Lorgelly & Julie Ratcliffe & Deborah Street & Rosalie Viney, 2023, "The Use of a Discrete Choice Experiment Including Both Duration and Dead for the Development of an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Australia," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 41, issue 4, pages 427-438, April, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-023-01243-0.
  5. Thao Thai & Michiel Bliemer & Gang Chen & Jean Spinks & Sonja de New & Emily Lancsar, 2023, "Comparison of a full and partial choice set design in a labeled discrete choice experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 32, issue 6, pages 1284-1304, June, DOI: 10.1002/hec.4666.
  6. Emily Lancsar & Elisabeth Huynh & Joffre Swait & Robert Breunig & Craig Mitton & Martyn Kirk & Cam Donaldson, 2023, "Preparing for future pandemics: A multi‐national comparison of health and economic trade‐offs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 32, issue 7, pages 1434-1452, July, DOI: 10.1002/hec.4673.

2022

  1. Huynh, Elisabeth & Swait, Joffre & Lancsar, Emily, 2022, "Modelling online job search and choices of dentists in the Australian job market: Staged sequential DCEs and FIML econometric methods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, volume 44, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100372.
  2. Hess, Stephane & Lancsar, Emily & Mariel, Petr & Meyerhoff, Jürgen & Song, Fangqing & van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline & Alaba, Olufunke A. & Amaris, Gloria & Arellana, Julián & Basso, Leonardo J. & Ben, 2022, "The path towards herd immunity: Predicting COVID-19 vaccination uptake through results from a stated choice study across six continents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 298, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114800.
  3. Julie Ratcliffe & Siobhan Bourke & Jinhu Li & Brendan Mulhern & Claire Hutchinson & Jyoti Khadka & Rachel Milte & Emily Lancsar, 2022, "Valuing the Quality-of-Life Aged Care Consumers (QOL-ACC) Instrument for Quality Assessment and Economic Evaluation," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 40, issue 11, pages 1069-1079, November, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01158-2.
  4. Joseph Kwon & Louise Freijser & Elisabeth Huynh & Martin Howell & Gang Chen & Kamran Khan & Shahd Daher & Nia Roberts & Conrad Harrison & Sarah Smith & Nancy Devlin & Kirsten Howard & Emily Lancsar & , 2022, "Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 40, issue 4, pages 379-431, April, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0.
  5. Cate Bailey & Martin Howell & Rakhee Raghunandan & Amber Salisbury & Gang Chen & Joanna Coast & Jonathan C. Craig & Nancy J. Devlin & Elisabeth Huynh & Emily Lancsar & Brendan J. Mulhern & Richard Nor, 2022, "Preference Elicitation Techniques Used in Valuing Children’s Health-Related Quality-of-Life: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 40, issue 7, pages 663-698, July, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-022-01149-3.
  6. Samare P. I. Huls & Emily Lancsar & Bas Donkers & Jemimah Ride, 2022, "Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 31, issue 12, pages 2630-2647, December, DOI: 10.1002/hec.4599.
  7. Emily Lancsar & Jemimah Ride & Nicole Black & Leonie Burgess & Anna Peeters, 2022, "Social acceptability of standard and behavioral economic inspired policies designed to reduce and prevent obesity," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 31, issue 1, pages 197-214, January, DOI: 10.1002/hec.4451.
  8. Jinhu Li & Nidhiya Menon, 2022, "Echo Effects of Health Shocks: The Intergenerational Consequences of Prenatal and Early-Life Malnutrition during the Great Leap Forward Famine in China," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, volume 58, issue 3, pages 454-481, March, DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2021.1969009.
  9. Anthony Scott & Jinhu Li & Hugh Gravelle & Matthew McGrail, 2022, "Physician Competition And Low-Value Health Care," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, volume 8, issue 2, pages 252-274, DOI: 10.1086/718509.

2021

  1. Geržinič, Nejc & van Cranenburgh, Sander & Cats, Oded & Lancsar, Emily & Chorus, Caspar, 2021, "Estimating decision rule differences between ‘best’ and ‘worst’ choices in a sequential best worst discrete choice experiment," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, volume 41, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100307.
  2. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021, "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part I. Macro-scale analysis of literature and integrative synthesis of empirical evidence from applied economics, experimental psychology and neuroimaging," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, volume 41, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100309.
  3. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Rose, John M. & Oppewal, Harmen & Lancsar, Emily, 2021, "Hypothetical bias in stated choice experiments: Part II. Conceptualisation of external validity, sources and explanations of bias and effectiveness of mitigation methods," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, volume 41, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.jocm.2021.100322.
  4. Peter Ghijben & Dennis Petrie & Silva Zavarsek & Gang Chen & Emily Lancsar, 2021, "Healthcare Funding Decisions and Real-World Benefits: Reducing Bias by Matching Untreated Patients," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 39, issue 7, pages 741-756, July, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-021-01020-x.

2020

  1. Blake, Miranda R. & Dubey, Subodh & Swait, Joffre & Lancsar, Emily & Ghijben, Peter, 2020, "An integrated modelling approach examining the influence of goals, habit and learning on choice using visual attention data," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, volume 117, issue C, pages 44-57, DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.040.
  2. Lancsar, Emily & Gu, Yuanyuan & Gyrd-Hansen, Dorte & Butler, Jim & Ratcliffe, Julie & Bulfone, Liliana & Donaldson, Cam, 2020, "The relative value of different QALY types," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, volume 70, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2020.102303.
  3. Emily Lancsar, 2020, "11th Meeting Of The International Academy Of Health Preference Research," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, volume 13, issue 1, pages 137-143, February, DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00398-3.
  4. Julie Ratcliffe & Billingsley Kaambwa & Claire Hutchinson & Emily Lancsar, 2020, "Empirical Investigation of Ranking vs Best–Worst Scaling Generated Preferences for Attributes of Quality of Life: One and the Same or Differentiable?," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, volume 13, issue 3, pages 307-315, June, DOI: 10.1007/s40271-019-00406-6.

2019

  1. Blake, Miranda R. & Lancsar, Emily & Peeters, Anna & Backholer, Kathryn, 2019, "Sugar-sweetened beverage price elasticities in a hypothetical convenience store," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 225, issue C, pages 98-107, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.021.
  2. Khadka, Jyoti & Kwon, Joseph & Petrou, Stavros & Lancsar, Emily & Ratcliffe, Julie, 2019, "Mind the (inter-rater) gap. An investigation of self-reported versus proxy-reported assessments in the derivation of childhood utility values for economic evaluation: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 240, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112543.
  3. Pickles, Kristen & Lancsar, Emily & Seymour, Janelle & Parkin, David & Donaldson, Cam & Carter, Stacy M., 2019, "Accounts from developers of generic health state utility instruments explain why they produce different QALYs: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 240, issue C, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112560.

2018

  1. Peter Ghijben & Yuanyuan Gu & Emily Lancsar & Silva Zavarsek, 2018, "Revealed and Stated Preferences of Decision Makers for Priority Setting in Health Technology Assessment: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 36, issue 3, pages 323-340, March, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0586-1.
  2. Kim Dalziel & Jinhu Li & Anthony Scott & Philip Clarke, 2018, "Accuracy of patient recall for self‐reported doctor visits: Is shorter recall better?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 27, issue 11, pages 1684-1698, November, DOI: 10.1002/hec.3794.

2017

  1. Ratcliffe, Julie & Lancsar, Emily & Walker, Ruth & Gu, Yuanyuan, 2017, "Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, volume 121, issue 6, pages 653-662, DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.03.003.
  2. Benjamin M. Craig & Emily Lancsar & Axel C. Mühlbacher & Derek S. Brown & Jan Ostermann, 2017, "Health Preference Research: An Overview," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, volume 10, issue 4, pages 507-510, August, DOI: 10.1007/s40271-017-0253-9.
  3. Brendan Mulhern & Richard Norman & Paula Lorgelly & Emily Lancsar & Julie Ratcliffe & John Brazier & Rosalie Viney, 2017, "Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 35, issue 4, pages 439-451, April, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-016-0475-z.
  4. Emily Lancsar & Denzil G. Fiebig & Arne Risa Hole, 2017, "Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 35, issue 7, pages 697-716, July, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-017-0506-4.
  5. Paul Contoyannis & Jinhu Li, 2017, "The dynamics of adolescent depression: an instrumental variable quantile regression with fixed effects approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, volume 180, issue 3, pages 907-922, June.
  6. Barbara Broadway & Guyonne Kalb & Jinhu Li & Anthony Scott, 2017, "Do Financial Incentives Influence GPs' Decisions to Do After‐hours Work? A Discrete Choice Labour Supply Model," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 26, issue 12, pages 52-66, December, DOI: 10.1002/hec.3476.

2015

  1. Kaambwa, Billingsley & Lancsar, Emily & McCaffrey, Nicola & Chen, Gang & Gill, Liz & Cameron, Ian D. & Crotty, Maria & Ratcliffe, Julie, 2015, "Investigating consumers' and informal carers' views and preferences for consumer directed care: A discrete choice experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 140, issue C, pages 81-94, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.06.034.
  2. Gu, Yuanyuan & Lancsar, Emily & Ghijben, Peter & Butler, James RG & Donaldson, Cam, 2015, "Attributes and weights in health care priority setting: A systematic review of what counts and to what extent," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 146, issue C, pages 41-52, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.005.
  3. Mark Pennington & Rachel Baker & Werner Brouwer & Helen Mason & Dorte Gyrd Hansen & Angela Robinson & Cam Donaldson & the EuroVaQ Team, 2015, "Comparing WTP Values of Different Types of QALY Gain Elicited from the General Public," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 24, issue 3, pages 280-293, March, DOI: 10.1002/hec.3018.
  4. Li, Jinhu & Powdthavee, Nattavudh, 2015, "Does more education lead to better health habits? Evidence from the school reforms in Australia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 127, issue C, pages 83-91, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.07.021.

2014

  1. Catherine Milte & Ruth Walker & Mary Luszcz & Emily Lancsar & Billingsley Kaambwa & Julie Ratcliffe, 2014, "How Important Is Health Status in Defining Quality of Life for Older People? An Exploratory Study of the Views of Older South Australians," Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, Springer, volume 12, issue 1, pages 73-84, February, DOI: 10.1007/s40258-013-0068-3.
  2. Jennifer Whitty & Emily Lancsar & Kylie Rixon & Xanthe Golenko & Julie Ratcliffe, 2014, "A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Studies Reporting Public Preferences for Healthcare Priority Setting," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, volume 7, issue 4, pages 365-386, December, DOI: 10.1007/s40271-014-0063-2.
  3. Emily Lancsar & Joffre Swait, 2014, "Reconceptualising the External Validity of Discrete Choice Experiments," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 32, issue 10, pages 951-965, October, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0181-7.
  4. Peter Ghijben & Emily Lancsar & Silva Zavarsek, 2014, "Preferences for Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: a Best–Best Discrete Choice Experiment," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 32, issue 11, pages 1115-1127, November, DOI: 10.1007/s40273-014-0188-0.
  5. Li, Jinhu & Scott, Anthony & McGrail, Matthew & Humphreys, John & Witt, Julia, 2014, "Retaining rural doctors: Doctors' preferences for rural medical workforce incentives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 121, issue C, pages 56-64, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.09.053.
  6. Jinhu Li & Jeremiah Hurley & Philip DeCicca & Gioia Buckley, 2014, "Physician Response To Pay‐For‐Performance: Evidence From A Natural Experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 23, issue 8, pages 962-978, August, DOI: 10.1002/hec.2971.

2013

  1. Lancsar, Emily & Louviere, Jordan & Donaldson, Cam & Currie, Gillian & Burgess, Leonie, 2013, "Best worst discrete choice experiments in health: Methods and an application," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 76, issue C, pages 74-82, DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.10.007.

2011

  1. Baker, Rachel & Chilton, Sue & Donaldson, Cam & Jones-Lee, Michael & Lancsar, Emily & Mason, Helen & Metcalf, Hugh & Pennington, Mark & Wildman, John, 2011, "Searchers vs surveyors in estimating the monetary value of a QALY: resolving a nasty dilemma for NICE," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, volume 6, issue 4, pages 435-447, October.
  2. Lancsar, Emily & Wildman, John & Donaldson, Cam & Ryan, Mandy & Baker, Rachel, 2011, "Deriving distributional weights for QALYs through discrete choice experiments," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, volume 30, issue 2, pages 466-478, March.
  3. Contoyannis, Paul & Li, Jinhu, 2011, "The evolution of health outcomes from childhood to adolescence," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, volume 30, issue 1, pages 11-32, January.

2009

  1. Louviere, Jordan J. & Lancsar, Emily, 2009, "Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future," Health Economics, Policy and Law, Cambridge University Press, volume 4, issue 4, pages 527-546, October.

2008

  1. Emily Lancsar & Jordan Louviere, 2008, "Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making," PharmacoEconomics, Springer, volume 26, issue 8, pages 661-677, August, DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004.
  2. Jinhu Li & Jeffrey S. Racine, 2008, "Maxima: An open source computer algebra system," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 23, issue 4, pages 515-523, DOI: 10.1002/jae.1007.

2007

  1. Lancsar, Emily & Louviere, Jordan & Flynn, Terry, 2007, "Several methods to investigate relative attribute impact in stated preference experiments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, volume 64, issue 8, pages 1738-1753, April.
  2. Madeleine T. King & Jane Hall & Emily Lancsar & Denzil Fiebig & Ishrat Hossain & Jordan Louviere & Helen K. Reddel & Christine R. Jenkins, 2007, "Patient preferences for managing asthma: results from a discrete choice experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 16, issue 7, pages 703-717, July, DOI: 10.1002/hec.1193.

2006

  1. Emily Lancsar & Jordan Louviere, 2006, "Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 15, issue 8, pages 797-811, August, DOI: 10.1002/hec.1104.

2005

  1. Emily Lancsar & Cam Donaldson, 2005, "Discrete choice experiments in health economics: Distinguishing between the method and its application," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), volume 6, issue 4, pages 314-316, December, DOI: 10.1007/s10198-005-0304-3.

2004

  1. Marian Shanahan & Emily Lancsar & Marion Haas & Bronwyn Lind & Don Weatherburn & Shuling Chen, 2004, "Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the New South Wales Adult Drug Court Program," Evaluation Review, , volume 28, issue 1, pages 3-27, February, DOI: 10.1177/0193841X03257531.
  2. Emily Lancsar & Elizabeth Savage, 2004, "Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 13, issue 9, pages 901-907, September, DOI: 10.1002/hec.870.
  3. Emily Lancsar & Elizabeth Savage, 2004, "Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., volume 13, issue 9, pages 919-924, September, DOI: 10.1002/hec.885.

Chapters

2014

  1. Emily Lancsar & Peter Burge, 2014, "Choice modelling research in health economics," Chapters, Edward Elgar Publishing, chapter 28, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly, "Handbook of Choice Modelling".

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.