IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/fomipm/1.html

Gescheitert zum Erfolg: Neue Arbeit und fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und großen Organisationen

Editor

Listed:
  • FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Hans-Jörg
  • Lippert, Jesco
  • Mühlbradt, Thomas
  • Munzke, Hans-Rüdiger
  • Richenhagen, Gottfried
  • Schat, Hans-Dieter

Abstract

[Vorwort:] "Gescheitert zum Erfolg - Fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und in großen Organisationen" - das war der Titel des 13. Mannheimer Gesprächs der FOM Hochschule. "Neue Arbeit(swelten)" und Ideenmanagement standen im Zentrum der acht Vorträge in Mannheim. Noch währende der Veranstaltung kam der Vorschlag auf, hierzu einen Sammelband herauszugeben. Direkt mit dem Thema des Ideenmanagements beschäftigt sich der Beitrag von Hans-Jörg Fischer, der die steuerliche Seite des Ideenmanagements beleuchtet. Breiter behandelt das Thema "Ideenmanagement" Hans-Rüdiger Munzke im Interview mit Jesco Lippert In der Folge stellte sich "New Work" als eigener Schwerpunkt. Ein einleitender Beitrag des Herausgebers gibt einen Überblick über die Diskussion. Speziell mit der Arbeitsmotivation in einer digitalisierten Arbeitswelt beschäftigt sich Thomas Mühlbradt. Einen Überblick ganz eigener Art bietet Gottfried Richenhagen mit seinem Beitrag "New Teamwork - Wie funktioniert Teamarbeit heute?" Die Entwicklung der Neuen Arbeit - oder die Entwicklung zur Neuen Arbeit? - ist in vollem Zuge. Endgültige Antworten sind aktuell noch nicht zu erwarten. Doch kann der vorliegende Band vielleicht den einen oder anderen Impuls zu dieser Diskussion beitragen.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Hans-Jörg & Lippert, Jesco & Mühlbradt, Thomas & Munzke, Hans-Rüdiger & Richenhagen, Gottfried & Schat, Hans-Dieter, 2020. "Gescheitert zum Erfolg: Neue Arbeit und fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und großen Organisationen," ifpm Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management, volume 1, number 1 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomipm:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/230709/1/FOM-ifpm-Schriftenreihe-Band-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2011. "Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 224-238, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Parker Hevron, 2018. "Judicialization and Its Effects: Experiments as a Way Forward," Laws, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Jean-Marc Bourgeon & José de Sousa & Alexis Noir-Luhalwe, 2022. "Social Distancing and Risk Taking: Evidence from a Team Game Show [Distanciation sociale et prise de risque : Les résultats d'un jeu d'équipe]," Sciences Po Economics Publications (main) hal-03792423, HAL.
    3. Mohammad H. Pakravan & Nordica MacCarty, 2020. "What Motivates Behavior Change? Analyzing User Intentions to Adopt Clean Technologies in Low-Resource Settings Using the Theory of Planned Behavior," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-32, June.
    4. Marina Halac & Andrea Prat, 2016. "Managerial Attention and Worker Performance," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(10), pages 3104-3132, October.
    5. Michael J Weir & Catherine M Ashcraft & Natallia Leuchanka Diessner & Bridie McGreavy & Emily Vogler & Todd Guilfoos, 2020. "Language effects on bargaining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Lopez Barrera, E., 2018. "Hispanics immigrants in the fields: is discrimination a barrier to get non-agricultural jobs?," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276016, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Eliot L. Sherman, 2020. "Discretionary Remote Working Helps Mothers Without Harming Non-mothers: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1351-1374, March.
    8. Sangyong Son & Jong Hee Park, 2023. "Nonproliferation Information and Attitude Change: Evidence From South Korea," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 67(6), pages 1095-1127, July.
    9. Bronchetti, Erin Todd & Huffman, David B. & Magenheim, Ellen, 2015. "Attention, intentions, and follow-through in preventive health behavior: Field experimental evidence on flu vaccination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 270-291.
    10. Stephan, Gesine & Hetschko, Clemens & Schmidtke, Julia & Eid, Michael & Lawes, Mario, 2024. "Feeling Observed? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Intense Survey Participation on Job Seekers' Labour Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 17347, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    11. Marina Bassi & Costas Meghir & Ana Reynoso, 2020. "Education Quality and Teaching Practices," The Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 130(631), pages 1937-1965.
    12. Fuhai Hong & Tanjim Hossain & John A. List & Migiwa Tanaka, 2018. "Testing The Theory Of Multitasking: Evidence From A Natural Field Experiment In Chinese Factories," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 511-536, May.
    13. Greer K. Gosnell & John A. List & Robert Metcalfe, 2016. "A New Approach to an Age-Old Problem: Solving Externalities by Incenting Workers Directly," NBER Working Papers 22316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    15. Martins, Pedro S., 2017. "Can Non-Cognitive Skills Programs Improve Achievement? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from EPIS," GLO Discussion Paper Series 105, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    16. Siebert, W. Stanley & Wei, Xiangdong & Wong, Ho Lun & Zhou, Xiang, 2018. "Student Feedback, Parent-Teacher Communication, and Academic Performance: Experimental Evidence from Rural China," IZA Discussion Papers 11347, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Sääksvuori, Lauri & Ramalingam, Abhijit, 2015. "Bargaining under surveillance: Evidence from a three-person ultimatum game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 66-78.
    18. Michael Kosfeld & Susanne Neckermann, 2011. "Getting More Work for Nothing? Symbolic Awards and Worker Performance," American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(3), pages 86-99, August.
    19. Ola Andersson & Marieke Huysentruyt & Topi Miettinen & Ute Stephan, 2017. "Person–Organization Fit and Incentives: A Causal Test," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(1), pages 73-96, January.
    20. Oriana Bandiera & Iwan Barankay & Imran Rasul, 2011. "Field Experiments with Firms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(3), pages 63-82, Summer.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomipm:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.