IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/fomipm/1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Gescheitert zum Erfolg: Neue Arbeit und fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und großen Organisationen

Editor

Listed:
  • FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management

Author

Listed:
  • Fischer, Hans-Jörg
  • Lippert, Jesco
  • Mühlbradt, Thomas
  • Munzke, Hans-Rüdiger
  • Richenhagen, Gottfried
  • Schat, Hans-Dieter

Abstract

[Vorwort:] "Gescheitert zum Erfolg - Fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und in großen Organisationen" - das war der Titel des 13. Mannheimer Gesprächs der FOM Hochschule. "Neue Arbeit(swelten)" und Ideenmanagement standen im Zentrum der acht Vorträge in Mannheim. Noch währende der Veranstaltung kam der Vorschlag auf, hierzu einen Sammelband herauszugeben. Direkt mit dem Thema des Ideenmanagements beschäftigt sich der Beitrag von Hans-Jörg Fischer, der die steuerliche Seite des Ideenmanagements beleuchtet. Breiter behandelt das Thema "Ideenmanagement" Hans-Rüdiger Munzke im Interview mit Jesco Lippert In der Folge stellte sich "New Work" als eigener Schwerpunkt. Ein einleitender Beitrag des Herausgebers gibt einen Überblick über die Diskussion. Speziell mit der Arbeitsmotivation in einer digitalisierten Arbeitswelt beschäftigt sich Thomas Mühlbradt. Einen Überblick ganz eigener Art bietet Gottfried Richenhagen mit seinem Beitrag "New Teamwork - Wie funktioniert Teamarbeit heute?" Die Entwicklung der Neuen Arbeit - oder die Entwicklung zur Neuen Arbeit? - ist in vollem Zuge. Endgültige Antworten sind aktuell noch nicht zu erwarten. Doch kann der vorliegende Band vielleicht den einen oder anderen Impuls zu dieser Diskussion beitragen.

Suggested Citation

  • Fischer, Hans-Jörg & Lippert, Jesco & Mühlbradt, Thomas & Munzke, Hans-Rüdiger & Richenhagen, Gottfried & Schat, Hans-Dieter, 2020. "Gescheitert zum Erfolg: Neue Arbeit und fehlerfreundliche Kultur in kleinen und großen Organisationen," ifpm Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management, volume 1, number 1 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, ifpm Institut für Public Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:fomipm:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/230709/1/FOM-ifpm-Schriftenreihe-Band-01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven D. Levitt & John A. List, 2011. "Was There Really a Hawthorne Effect at the Hawthorne Plant? An Analysis of the Original Illumination Experiments," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 224-238, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Belot, Michèle & James, Jonathan, 2011. "Healthy school meals and educational outcomes," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 489-504, May.
    2. Shawn Cole & Martin Kanz & Leora Klapper, 2015. "Incentivizing Calculated Risk-Taking: Evidence from an Experiment with Commercial Bank Loan Officers," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 70(2), pages 537-575, April.
    3. Michael J Weir & Catherine M Ashcraft & Natallia Leuchanka Diessner & Bridie McGreavy & Emily Vogler & Todd Guilfoos, 2020. "Language effects on bargaining," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Simons, Andrew M. & Beltramo, Theresa & Blalock, Garrick & Levine, David I., 2017. "Using unobtrusive sensors to measure and minimize Hawthorne effects: Evidence from cookstoves," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 68-80.
    5. Fuhai Hong & Tanjim Hossain & John A. List & Migiwa Tanaka, 2018. "Testing The Theory Of Multitasking: Evidence From A Natural Field Experiment In Chinese Factories," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 59(2), pages 511-536, May.
    6. Bronchetti, Erin Todd & Huffman, David B. & Magenheim, Ellen, 2015. "Attention, intentions, and follow-through in preventive health behavior: Field experimental evidence on flu vaccination," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 270-291.
    7. Stephan, Gesine & Hetschko, Clemens & Schmidtke, Julia & Eid, Michael & Lawes, Mario, 2024. "Feeling Observed? A Field Experiment on the Effects of Intense Survey Participation on Job Seekers' Labour Market Outcomes," IZA Discussion Papers 17347, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    8. Gosnell, Greer & Metcalfe, Robert & List, John A, 2016. "A new approach to an age-old problem: solving externalities by incenting workers directly," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84331, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. Eszter Czibor & David Jimenez‐Gomez & John A. List, 2019. "The Dozen Things Experimental Economists Should Do (More of)," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 86(2), pages 371-432, October.
    10. Martins, Pedro S., 2017. "Can Non-Cognitive Skills Programs Improve Achievement? Quasi-Experimental Evidence from EPIS," GLO Discussion Paper Series 105, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    11. Sääksvuori, Lauri & Ramalingam, Abhijit, 2015. "Bargaining under surveillance: Evidence from a three-person ultimatum game," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 66-78.
    12. Nayef Al-Ghamri, 2016. "Challenges Facing Businesswomen and Their Negative Impact on the Performance of Small Businesses in the Province of Jeddah in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(9), pages 1-96, August.
    13. O'Connor, Richard J. & Rousu, Matthew C. & Corrigan, Jay R. & Travers, Maansi Bansal, 2018. "Does winning an experimental auction change people's behavior? An application to e-cigarettes," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 281-285.
    14. Spencer Bastani & Daniel Waldenström, 2021. "Perceptions of Inherited Wealth and the Support for Inheritance Taxation," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 88(350), pages 532-569, April.
    15. Emma von Essen & Marieke Huysentruyt & Topi Miettinen, 2019. "Exploration in Teams and the Encouragement Effect: Theory and Evidence," Economics Working Papers 2019-10, Department of Economics and Business Economics, Aarhus University.
    16. Erik Hurst & Geng Li & Benjamin Pugsley, 2014. "Are Household Surveys Like Tax Forms? Evidence from Income Underreporting of the Self-Employed," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 96(1), pages 19-33, March.
    17. Joshua B. Gilbert & Zachary Himmelsbach & James Soland & Mridul Joshi & Benjamin W. Domingue, 2024. "Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Item-Level Outcome Data: Insights from Item Response Theory," Papers 2405.00161, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2025.
    18. Hansen, Bradley A. & Hansen, Mary Eschelbach, 2016. "The historian's craft and economics," Journal of Institutional Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 349-370, June.
    19. Ouazad, Amine & Page, Lionel, 2013. "Students' perceptions of teacher biases: Experimental economics in schools," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 116-130.
    20. Achyuta Adhvaryu & Namrata Kala & Anant Nyshadham, 2020. "The Light and the Heat: Productivity Co-Benefits of Energy-Saving Technology," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(4), pages 779-792, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:fomipm:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fommmde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.