IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/bibbwd/138.html

Tätigkeitsschwerpunkte und ihre Auswirkungen auf Erwerbstätige: eine empirische Anwendung des Tätigkeitsansatzes für die Beschreibung von Arbeitsplätzen in Deutschland und die Abschätzung sozioökonomischer Konsequenzen der Teilhabeleistungen von Erwerbsarbeit im Jahr 2006

Author

Listed:
  • Alda, Holger

Abstract

Der Tätigkeitsansatz von Autor/Levy/Mumane (2003) formuliert einen positiven Zusammenhang zwischen der Technologieintensität und der relativen Nachfrage nach sogenannten Nicht-Routine-Tätigkeiten. Acemoglu/Autor (2010) argumentieren darüber hinaus, dass der Allokationsmechanismus von Qualifikationen und beruflichen Tätigkeiten in Nationalökonomien aufgrund imperfekter Funktionsweisen von Arbeitsmärkten eine eigenständige empirische Fragestellung ist. In diesem Fall ist anzunehmen, dass entsprechende Allokationsmechanismen eine jeweils unterschiedliche Wirkung auf die Erwerbstätigen haben, etwa im Bereich von Löhnen, dem Einsatz von (Computer-)Technologie am Arbeitsplatz oder dem Einsatz von berufsspezifischen und allgemeinen Kompetenzen. Die vorgelegten empirischen Analysen bestätigen dies für Erwerbstätige in Deutschland im Jahre 2006. Entsprechende Zugangsvoraussetzungen zu solchen Arbeitsplätzen spiegeln sich zu einem gewissen Teil im formellen Qualifikationsniveau der Erwerbstätigen wider. Im Jahr 2006 haben in Deutschland etwa 84 Prozent der erwerbstätigen Absolventinnen und Absolventen einer (Fach-)Hochschule eine Schwerpunkt im Bereich eher anspruchsvoller Nicht-Routinetätigkeiten, bei Personen mit einer abgeschlossenen dualen Berufsausbildung sind es etwa 38 Prozent. (Autorenreferat, BIBB-Doku)

Suggested Citation

  • Alda, Holger, 2013. "Tätigkeitsschwerpunkte und ihre Auswirkungen auf Erwerbstätige: eine empirische Anwendung des Tätigkeitsansatzes für die Beschreibung von Arbeitsplätzen in Deutschland und die Abschätzung sozioökonomischer Konsequenzen der Teilhabeleistungen von Erwe," Wissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere, Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (BIBB), Bonn, volume 127, number 138, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:bibbwd:138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/236102/1/bibb-wdp138.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexandra Spitz-Oener, 2006. "Technical Change, Job Tasks, and Rising Educational Demands: Looking outside the Wage Structure," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 24(2), pages 235-270, April.
    2. Stephan Gesine, 2008. "The Effects of Active Labor Market Programs in Germany: An Investigation Using Different Definitions of Non-Treatment," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 228(5-6), pages 586-611, October.
    3. A. D. Roy, 1951. "Some Thoughts On The Distribution Of Earnings," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 3(2), pages 135-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michael J. Böhm & Hans-Martin von Gaudecker & Felix Schran, 2024. "Occupation Growth, Skill Prices, and Wage Inequality," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(1), pages 201-243.
    2. Daniela Rohrbach-Schmidt, 2019. "Putting Tasks to the Test: The Case of Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 122-135.
    3. Sergio Ocampo, 2019. "A task-based theory of occupations with multidimensional heterogeneity," 2019 Meeting Papers 477, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    4. Torsten Lietzmann & Paul Schmelzer & Jürgen Wiemers, 2017. "Marginal employment for welfare recipients: stepping stone or obstacle?," LABOUR, CEIS, vol. 31(4), pages 394-414, December.
    5. Hogrefe, Jan, 2013. "Offshoring and relative labor demand from a task perspective," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-067, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    6. Autor, David, 2013. "The "task approach" to labor markets : an overview," Journal for Labour Market Research, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 46(3), pages 185-199.
    7. David H. Autor & Michael J. Handel, 2013. "Putting Tasks to the Test: Human Capital, Job Tasks, and Wages," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 31(S1), pages 59-96.
    8. Katharina Dengler, 2019. "Effectiveness of sequences of classroom training for welfare recipients: what works best in West Germany?," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(1), pages 1-46, January.
    9. Anthony Strittmatter & Uwe Sunde & Dainis Zegners, 2020. "Life cycle patterns of cognitive performance over the long run," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117(44), pages 27255-27261, November.
    10. Carl Sanders & Christopher Taber, 2012. "Life-Cycle Wage Growth and Heterogeneous Human Capital," Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 4(1), pages 399-425, July.
    11. Daniela Rohrbach-Schmidt, 2019. "Putting Tasks to the Test: The Case of Germany," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 122-135.
    12. Boehm, Michael J., 2013. "Has job polarization squeezed the middle class? Evidence from the allocation of talents," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51554, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Cavaglia, Chiara & Etheridge, Ben, 2020. "Job polarization and the declining quality of knowledge workers: Evidence from the UK and Germany," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    14. Katrin Hohmeyer, 2011. "Effectiveness of One-Euro-Jobs: Do programme characteristics matter?," Post-Print hal-00719485, HAL.
    15. Uta Schoenberg & Christina Gathmann, 2006. "How General is Specific Human Capital? Using Mobility Patterns to Study Skill Transferability in the Labor Market," 2006 Meeting Papers 598, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    16. Michael J. Boehm, 2013. "Has Job Polarization Squeezed the Middle Class? Evidence from the Allocation of Talents," CEP Discussion Papers dp1215, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    17. Márton Csillag & Miklós Koren, 2011. "Machines and machinists: Capital-skill complementarity from an international trade perspective," CeFiG Working Papers 13, Center for Firms in the Global Economy, revised 25 Mar 2011.
    18. Caliendo, Marco & Künn, Steffen, 2011. "Start-up subsidies for the unemployed: Long-term evidence and effect heterogeneity," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 311-331.
    19. Lietzmann, Torsten & Schmelzer, Paul & Wiemers, Jürgen, 2016. "Does marginal employment promote regular employment for unemployed welfare benefit recipients in Germany?," IAB-Discussion Paper 201618, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany].

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:bibbwd:138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.bibb.de/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.