Capital Flows and Implication for Central Bank Policies in The SEACEN Countries
The SEACEN economies have liberalised their external accounts and domestic financial markets. The current account is fully convertible in all the countries in the SEACEN region while the capital account is by and large fully convertible in the majority of these countries. Since early 1990s, net capital flow to the SEACEN countries increased steadily until 1996 due to the massive increase in total capital inflows. However, after the financial crisis of 1997, total capital outflows have outweighed total capital inflows resulting in a negative net capital flow. Both domestic factors such as attractive economic growth, attractive interest rates and large current account deficits and external factors such as low world interest rates are responsible for the increased capital inflows in the region. However, determinants of short-term capital inflows vary from that of the total capital inflows. Notably, short-term capital inflows are found to be inversely associated with domestic economic growth. The effects of push and pull factors on capital flows vary across the countries. Recent experiences of SEACEN countries indicate that the US sub-prime mortgage crisis has led to slower capital inflows in the region while domestic political climate, further liberalisation in overseas investment; and, encouragement to invest abroad have accelerated capital outflows. The SEACEN region has benefited significantly from the increased capital inflows mainly in terms of increased investment, higher economic growth, favourable external accounts and developed financial markets. However, capital flows have also led to challenges for monetary and financial stability. The recent experience of SEACEN countries shows that capital flows can create asset price bubbles and induce sharp increases in bank credit while outflow of capital results in lower equity prices and depreciation of exchange rates. Short-term capital inflows are highly volatile and prone to sudden reversals. After 2003, the share of short-term inflow started to become increasingly dominant in the total inflow in the SEACEN region, resembling the pattern of capital flows before the 1997 crisis. Due to the larger share of highly volatile shortterm foreign capital, SEACEN economies are again, facing the risk of massive capital reversals. In order to prevent a repetition of the same problems in the future, SEACEN countries need to encourage more long-term capital inflows rather than short-term ones. To safeguard the financial system and the economy from speculative attacks, authorities need to implement more prudent regulations and cautiously monitor potential areas of such attacks. In order to maintain a conducive monetary stability environment, central banks need to sterilise inflows with appropriate intervention measures. Freer exchange rates allow for more capital flows in and out of the country. However, in the time of distress, the countries that have a free floating exchange rate regime may suffer from larger capital reversals. Therefore, a managed floating exchange regime may be more advantageous during a crisis. The financial markets and economies of the SEACEN countries are currently affected by the global financial crisis, due mainly to external factors. In order to minimise further negative impacts of the crisis on various sectors of the economy including capital flows, to speed up the recovery process, and also to explore the possibility of inventing new economic drivers within the region, coordinated policy measures need to be implemented at the national as well as regional levels.
|This book is provided by South East Asian Central Banks (SEACEN) Research and Training Centre in its series Research Studies with number rp76 and published in 2009.|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Level 5, Sasana Kijang, Bank Negara Malaysia, 2 Jalan Dato? Onn, 50480 Kuala Lumpur|
Phone: 603-9195 1888
Fax: 603-9195 1801
Web page: http://edirc.repec.org/data/seacemy.html
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Guillermo A. Calvo & Leonardo Leiderman & Carmen M. Reinhart, 1996.
"Inflows of Capital to Developing Countries in the 1990s,"
Journal of Economic Perspectives,
American Economic Association, vol. 10(2), pages 123-139, Spring.
- Reinhart, Carmen & Calvo, Guillermo & Leiderman, Leonardo, 1996. "Inflows of capital to developing countries in the 1990s," MPRA Paper 13707, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo, 1996.
"The new wave of private capital inflows: Push or pull?,"
Journal of Development Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 389-418, March.
- Fernandez-Arias, Eduardo & DEC, 1994. "The new wave of private capital inflows : push or pull?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1312, The World Bank.
- Gian Maria Milesi-Ferrett & Assaf Razin, 1998.
"Current Account Reversals and Currency Crises: Empirical Regularities,"
NBER Working Papers
6620, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gian Maria Milesi Ferretti & Assaf Razin, 2000. "Current Account Reversals and Currency Crises: Empirical Regularities," NBER Chapters, in: Currency Crises, pages 285-323 National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gian M Milesi-Ferretti & Assaf Razin, 1998. "Current Account Reversals and Currency Crises; Empirical Regularities," IMF Working Papers 98/89, International Monetary Fund.
- Milesi-Ferretti, Gian Maria & Razin, Assaf, 1998. "Current Account Reversals and Currency Crises: Empirical Regularities," CEPR Discussion Papers 1921, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Johansen, Soren, 1995. "Likelihood-Based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198774501.
- Jeannine N. Bailliu, 2000.
"Private Capital Flows, Financial Development, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries,"
Staff Working Papers
00-16, Bank of Canada.
- Bailliu, Jeannine N., 2000. "Private Capital Flows, Financial Development, and Economic Growth in Developing Countries," Staff Working Papers 00-15, Bank of Canada.
- Kim, Yoonbai, 2000. "Causes of capital flows in developing countries," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 235-253, April.
- Leff, Nathaniel H, 1969. "Dependency Rates and Savings Rates," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(5), pages 886-896, December.
- Borensztein, E. & De Gregorio, J. & Lee, J-W., 1998.
"How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth?1,"
Journal of International Economics,
Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 115-135, June.
- Eduardo Borensztein & Jose De Gregorio & Jong-Wha Lee, 1995. "How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?," NBER Working Papers 5057, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Johansen, Soren, 1991. "Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 59(6), pages 1551-1580, November.
- Ramon Moreno, 2000. "What explains capital flows?," FRBSF Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue jul21.
- Shrestha, Min B. & Chowdhury, Khorshed, 2005. "Sequential Procedure for Testing Unit Roots in the Presence of Structural Break in Time Series Data," Economics Working Papers wp05-06, School of Economics, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
- Lucas, Robert E, Jr, 1990. "Why Doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries?," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 92-96, May.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sea:rstudy:rp76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Yunyee)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.