IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/ris/prodir/44.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Safeguards Inquiry into the Import of Pigmeat

Author

Listed:
  • Productivity Commission

Abstract

While Australian pigmeat producers are feeling pressure from substantially higher feed costs, in the Productivity Commission’s assessment these circumstances do not meet the WTO criteria for safeguards action. The WTO Safeguards Agreement requires evidence that significant increases in imports have caused serious injury to the local industry. However, although imports have been increasing in recent years, the Productivity Commission found that they had broadly met increases in consumer demand, without driving down local producer prices. A sharp fall in industry profitability in the second half of 2007 was caused by an unprecedented increase in feed grain costs, which increased production costs by 40-50 cents per kilo of pigmeat. This rise added to substantial increases in feed grain prices in 2006. Without these higher feed prices, producers would have remained profitable over 2007.

Suggested Citation

  • Productivity Commission, 2008. "Safeguards Inquiry into the Import of Pigmeat," Inquiry Reports, Productivity Commission, Government of Australia, number 44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ris:prodir:44
    Note: 190 pages
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/78457/pigmeatsafeguards.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.pc.gov.au/projects/inquiry/pigmeatsafeguards/docs/finalreport
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sykes, Alan O., 2006. "The WTO Agreement on Safeguards: A Commentary," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199277407, Decembrie.
    2. A. Carbone & G. Kaniadakis & A. M. Scarfone, 2007. "Tails and Ties," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 57(2), pages 121-125, May.
    3. Sykes, Alan O., 2003. "The safeguards mess: a critique of WTO jurisprudence," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 2(3), pages 261-295, November.
    4. Griffith, Garry & I'Anson, Kym & Hill, Debbie & Lubett, ROland & Vere, David, 2001. "Previous Demand Elasticity Estimates For Australian Meat Products," Research Reports 280777, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries Research Economists.
    5. Unknown, 2005. "Australian Pigmeat Industry," Inquiry Reports 31893, Productivity Commission.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Griffith, Garry R. & Malcolm, Bill & Mounter, Stuart W. & Slattery, Henry, 2010. "Old model, new problem: when should you update a model and what happens when you do?," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 18, pages 1-16.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mostafa Beshkar, 2016. "Arbitration and Renegotiation in Trade Agreements," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 586-619.
    2. Mostafa Beshkar, 2014. "Arbitration and Renegotiation in Trade Agreements," Caepr Working Papers 2014-004, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Economics Department, Indiana University Bloomington.
    3. Bernard Hoekman & Petros Mavroidis, 2023. "Reassessing the Safeguards Mess," RSCAS Working Papers 2023/14, European University Institute.
    4. Mostafa Beshkar & Jee-Hyeong Park, 2017. "Dispute Settlement with Second-Order Uncertainty: The Case of International Trade Disputes," CAEPR Working Papers 2017-010, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    5. Griffith, Garry R. & Coddington, Anna & Murdoch, Scott, 2004. "Beef Feedlot Supply Response in Australia," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 12.
    6. Gallet, Craig A., 2010. "The income elasticity of meat: a meta-analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 54(4), pages 1-14.
    7. Henry W. Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Antidumping Measures: Some Evidence for Farmed Atlantic Salmon," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 459-477, September.
    8. Chad P. Bown, 2014. "Trade Policy Flexibilities and Turkey: Tariffs, Anti-dumping, Safeguards and WTO Dispute Settlement," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 193-218, February.
    9. Ausloos, Marcel, 2012. "Econophysics of a religious cult: The Antoinists in Belgium [1920–2000]," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3190-3197.
    10. Spitzley, Dinah & Prügl, Reinhard, 2017. "Deutschlands nächste Unternehmergeneration: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Einstellungen, Werte und Zukunftspläne," Studien, Stiftung Familienunternehmen / Foundation for Family Businesses, number 250012.
    11. Horn, Henrik & Mavroidis, Petros C., 2006. "A Survey of the Literature on the WTO Dispute Settlement System," Working Paper Series 684, Research Institute of Industrial Economics.
    12. Bown, Chad, 2007. "Developing Countries and Enforcement of Trade Agreements: Why Dispute Settlement Is Not Enough," CEPR Discussion Papers 6459, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    13. Ali Hortaçsu & Chad Syverson, 2007. "Cementing Relationships: Vertical Integration, Foreclosure, Productivity, and Prices," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 115, pages 250-301.
    14. Wicks, Santhi & Allen, Benjamin, 2012. "Returns on investment in wild dog management-beef production in the South Australian Arid Lands," 2012 Conference (56th), February 7-10, 2012, Fremantle, Australia 124479, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    15. Simon Schropp, 2007. "Revisiting the "Compliance-vs.-Rebalancing" Debate in WTO Scholarship a Unified Research Agenda," IHEID Working Papers 29-2007, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, revised Dec 2007.
    16. Ayuda, María-Isabel & Puche-Gil, Javier, 2014. "Determinants of height and biological inequality in Mediterranean Spain, 1859–1967," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 15(C), pages 101-119.
    17. Chad P. Bown, 2005. "Trade Remedies and World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement: Why Are So Few Challenged?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 34(2), pages 515-555, June.
    18. Kyle Bagwell & Chad P. Bown & Robert W. Staiger, 2016. "Is the WTO Passé?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(4), pages 1125-1231, December.
    19. Motallebi, Marzieh & Pendell, Dustin L., 2013. "Estimating an Almost Ideal Demand System Model for Meats in Iran," 2013 Annual Meeting, August 4-6, 2013, Washington, D.C. 150188, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Bown, Chad P., 2014. "Trade policy instruments over time," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6757, The World Bank.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    pork; swine; world trade; tariffs; meat products;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ris:prodir:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MAPS (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/pcgovau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.