Despite the ongoing controversy over their use, genetically modified (GM) crops have progressively grown in popularity and are now planted in approximately 160 million hectares in 29 countries. In the discussions of biosafety regulations for GM crops and whether to approve such crops for commercialization, many countries, including some African nations, have gone beyond environmental assessments and are now introducing socioeconomic considerations as part of their decisionmaking process. There are, however, very few guidelines on how to ensure that this inclusion of socioeconomic considerations results in a robust and efficient decisionmaking process. Socioeconomic Considerations in Biosafety Decisionmaking: Methods and Implementation provides guidance to professionals involved in assessing the ex ante impact of a GM crop in the context of an approval process. Using the case of GM cotton in Uganda, the authors illustrate the evaluation of socioeconomic impact on farmers, the national economy, and trade. The authors identify three crucial steps in making socioeconomic assessment part of a biosafety regulatory process, decisionmaking process, or both. First, select appropriate research tools and methods that yield robust results but that also take into account time and budget constraints. Second, evaluate the institutional setting of GM technology deployment. Third, allow for the uncertainties inherent in the assessment by using ranges of values for the parameters under evaluation, including yield, technology efficiency, and prices. These and other conclusions should provide useful guidance to policymakers and development researchers in countries that opt to incorporate socioeconomic considerations into their biosafety regulations, as well as their decisionmaking process for GM crop approval.
Horna, Daniela & Zambrano, Patricia & Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin (ed.), 2013.
"Socioeconomic considerations in biosafety decisionmaking: Methods and implementation,"
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), number 978-0-89629-207-9.
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- William W. Wilson & Eric A. DeVuyst & Richard D. Taylor & Won W. Koo & Bruce L. Dahl, 2008.
"Implications of biotech traits with segregation costs and market segments: the case of Roundup Ready-super- Wheat,"
European Review of Agricultural Economics,
Foundation for the European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 35(1), pages 51-73, March.
- You, Liangzhi & Chamberlin, Jordan, 2004.
"Spatial analysis of sustainable livelihood enterprises of Uganda cotton production:,"
EPTD discussion papers
121, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
- Yanggen, David & Kelly, Valerie A. & Reardon, Thomas & Naseem, Anwar, 1998.
"Incentives for Fertilizer Use in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review of Empirical Evidence on Fertilizer Response and Profitability,"
Food Security International Development Working Papers
54677, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
(including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fpr:ifprib:9780896292079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/ifprius.html .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.