IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/dau/thesis/123456789-14033.html

Secteurs manufacturiers dans le système communautaire d'échange de quotas d'émissions

Editor

Listed:
  • De Perthuis, Christian

Author

Listed:
  • Lecourt, Stephen

Abstract

The thesis focuses on the aggregated non-power sector covered under the EU ETS. First, the non-power sector contribution to CO2 emissions changes in the first two phases of the Scheme (2005-2012), both from a final demand perspective and a supply perspective, is compared to that of the power sector at first. Then, the implications of the non-power sector specific free allocation methodology in the third phase of the Scheme (2013-2020) are scrutinized, which constitutes one of the first thorough assessment of Phase 3 benchmarking. It is showed that both from a final demand perspective and a supply perspective, the non-power sector, through its interrelated character and its activity levels, has contributed to changes in EU ETS CO2 emissions more than the power sector did, over the 2005-2012 period. It is also showed that, despite its free allocation redistribution effects, benchmark-based Phase 3 free allocation remains flawed and may benefit from further improvements to be up to the central role of the non-power sector in the EU ETS dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Lecourt, Stephen, 2014. "Secteurs manufacturiers dans le système communautaire d'échange de quotas d'émissions," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/14033 edited by De Perthuis, Christian.
    • Handle: RePEc:dau:thesis:123456789/14033
    Note: dissertation
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://basepub.dauphine.fr/xmlui/bitstream/123456789/14033/2/2014PA090021.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:dau:papers:123456789/11687 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. repec:aen:journl:1996v17-03-a06 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Raphael Trotignon, 2012. "Combining cap-and-trade with offsets: lessons from the EU-ETS," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(3), pages 273-287, May.
    4. Pan A. Yotopoulos & Jeffrey B. Nugent, 1973. "A Balanced-Growth Version of the Linkage Hypothesis: A Test," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(2), pages 157-171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Quemin, Simon & Trotignon, Raphaël, 2021. "Emissions trading with rolling horizons," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Dijck, P. van & Verbruggen, H., 1980. "Productive employment in developing countries' exporting industries," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    3. Gavard, Claire & Kirat, Djamel, 2018. "Flexibility in the market for international carbon credits and price dynamics difference with European allowances," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 504-518.
    4. Simon Quemin & Christian Perthuis, 2019. "Transitional Restricted Linkage Between Emissions Trading Schemes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(1), pages 1-32, September.
    5. D. F. Stewart, 1987. "Small‐scale Mining and Development: The Case of Gold Mining in Papua New Guinea," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 219-227, August.
    6. Junning Cai & Pingsun Leung, 2004. "Linkage Measures: a Revisit and a Suggested Alternative," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-83.
    7. Wang-Helmreich, Hanna & Kreibich, Nicolas, 2019. "The potential impacts of a domestic offset component in a carbon tax on mitigation of national emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 453-460.
    8. Xiao Jiang & Chau Nguyen, 2018. "A Revisit to the Forgotten Debate after Half-Century: Balanced Versus Unbalanced Growth," Working Papers 1817, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    9. Suresh Deman, 1990. "Comparison of Regional Structures of Production: A Study in Development Strategy," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 60-75, Spring.
    10. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Tiiu Paas & Maryna Tverdostup, 2018. "The Input-Output Analysis Of Blue Industries: Comparative Study Of Estonia And Finland," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 109, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    11. Helene Naegele, 2015. "Offset Credits in the EU ETS: A Quantile Estimation of Firm-Level Transaction Costs," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 1513, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    12. Naegele, Helene, 2018. "Offset Credits in the EU ETS: A Quantile Estimation of Firm-Level Transaction Costs," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 70(1), pages 77-106.
    13. Koch, Nicolas & Reuter, Wolf Heinrich & Fuss, Sabine & Grosjean, Godefroy, 2017. "Permits vs. offsets under investment uncertainty," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 33-47.
    14. Riedel, James, 1975. "Factor Proportions, Linkages and the Open Developing Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 57(4), pages 487-494, November.
    15. Koop, Gary & Tole, Lise, 2013. "Modeling the relationship between European carbon permits and certified emission reductions," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 166-181.
    16. Beat Hintermann & Marc Gronwald, 2019. "Linking with Uncertainty: The Relationship Between EU ETS Pollution Permits and Kyoto Offsets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 74(2), pages 761-784, October.
    17. Chunyu Pan & Anil Kumar Shrestha & Guangyu Wang & John L. Innes & Kevin Xinwei Wang & Nuyun Li & Jinliang Li & Yeyun He & Chunguang Sheng & John-O. Niles, 2021. "A Linkage Framework for the China National Emission Trading System (CETS): Insight from Key Global Carbon Markets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Helene Naegele, 2018. "Offset Credits in the EU ETS: A Quantile Estimation of Firm-Level Transaction Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 70(1), pages 77-106, May.
    19. Susanne Fricke & Bianka Dettmer, 2014. "Backbone services as growth enabling factor - an Input-Output analysis for South Africa," Jena Economics Research Papers 2014-016, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    20. Raffaele Giammetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2020. "Key sectors in input–output production networks: An application to Brexit," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 840-870, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q51 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Valuation of Environmental Effects
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • L6 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dau:thesis:123456789/14033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alexandre Faure The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Alexandre Faure to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/daup9fr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.