IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/rre/publsh/v20y1990i2p60-75.html

Comparison of Regional Structures of Production: A Study in Development Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Suresh Deman

    (Australian National University)

Abstract

Input-output techniques have acquired a pivotal place in the conversion specifications of objective functions and in the planning of structural relations of an economy. The synoptic intent of this work is to review various operational applications of regional intersectoral patterns of linkages and complementarities that may be useful in formulating an appropriate strategy for regional economic development. Input-output techniques are extensively used for this purpose. There does not exist any fool proof strategy for formulating regional development strategy. One view is that the "leading sectors" are identified on the basis of interindustry linkages and essential resources as production proceeds in the use of inputs. This assumes a reasonable expectation that the relevant output can be sold within these sectors. The other view studies structural changes in the process of economic growth on the basis of linkages. This can be accomplished by comparing the scale as well as the ranking of sectors between groups of regions based on interindustry linkages. On this basis one could test Hirschman's unbalanced growth hypothesis that high priority be given to the sectors which have high linkages and low priority to others. However, Yutopoulos and Nugent's (1973) studies do not find much support in favor of Hirschman's perspective. There is an alternative hypothesis which regards regional development as the change induced by natural resource oriented and export-base industries. Such industries are located on the basis of transport, technological and resource cost advantages of a specific region over the others. Therefore, identifying regional trade flows for studying cost disadvantages of natural resource oriented industries is very important Similarly, changes in demand outside the region, natural resource position, changes in technology and relative costs of factor inputs, etc., should be tackled directly for evolving any regional development strategy rather than basing decisions on the size and pattern of linkages.

Suggested Citation

  • Suresh Deman, 1990. "Comparison of Regional Structures of Production: A Study in Development Strategy," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 60-75, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:rre:publsh:v20:y:1990:i:2:p:60-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journal.srsa.org/ojs/index.php/RRS/article/view/20.2.7/pdf/
    File Function: To View On Journal Page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://journal.srsa.org/ojs/index.php/RRS/article/download/20.2.7/pdf/
    File Function: To Download Article
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Riedel, 1976. "A Balanced-Growth Version of the Linkage Hypothesis: A Comment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(2), pages 319-322.
    2. Michel Boucher, 1976. "Some Further Results on the Linkage Hypothesis," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 90(2), pages 313-318.
    3. Pan A. Yotopoulos & Jeffrey B. Nugent, 1973. "A Balanced-Growth Version of the Linkage Hypothesis: A Test," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 87(2), pages 157-171.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Holz, Carsten A., 2011. "The unbalanced growth hypothesis and the role of the state: The case of China's state-owned enterprises," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 220-238, November.
    2. Lenzen, Manfred, 2003. "Environmentally important paths, linkages and key sectors in the Australian economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 14(1), pages 1-34, March.
    3. Dijck, P. van & Verbruggen, H., 1980. "Productive employment in developing countries' exporting industries," Serie Research Memoranda 0003, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    4. Breandán Ó. hUallacháin, 1984. "Input-Output Linkages and Foreign Direct Investment in Ireland," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 9(3), pages 185-200, December.
    5. B. Andreosso‐O'Callaghan & G. Yue, 2004. "Intersectoral Linkages and Key Sectors in China, 1987–1997," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 18(2), pages 165-183, June.
    6. Vicent Alcántara & Emilio Padilla, 2006. "An input-output analysis of the "key" sectors in CO2 emissions from a production perspective: an application to the Spanish economy," Working Papers wpdea0601, Department of Applied Economics at Universitat Autonoma of Barcelona.
    7. Hai Thanh Nguyen, 2021. "Intersectoral linkages and imports of Vietnam: An input-output approach," Departmental Working Papers 2021-03, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    8. D. F. Stewart, 1987. "Small‐scale Mining and Development: The Case of Gold Mining in Papua New Guinea," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 219-227, August.
    9. Steven G. Cochrane, 1990. "Input-Output Linkages in a Frontier Region of Indonesia," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 13(1-2), pages 183-203, April.
    10. Junning Cai & Pingsun Leung, 2004. "Linkage Measures: a Revisit and a Suggested Alternative," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 63-83.
    11. Xiao Jiang & Chau Nguyen, 2018. "A Revisit to the Forgotten Debate after Half-Century: Balanced Versus Unbalanced Growth," Working Papers 1817, New School for Social Research, Department of Economics.
    12. Gaygysyz Ashyrov & Tiiu Paas & Maryna Tverdostup, 2018. "The Input-Output Analysis Of Blue Industries: Comparative Study Of Estonia And Finland," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 109, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    13. Riedel, James, 1975. "Factor Proportions, Linkages and the Open Developing Economy," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 57(4), pages 487-494, November.
    14. Susanne Fricke & Bianka Dettmer, 2014. "Backbone services as growth enabling factor - an Input-Output analysis for South Africa," Jena Economics Research Papers 2014-016, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
    15. Lecourt, Stephen, 2014. "Secteurs manufacturiers dans le système communautaire d'échange de quotas d'émissions," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/14033 edited by De Perthuis, Christian.
    16. Raffaele Giammetti & Alberto Russo & Mauro Gallegati, 2020. "Key sectors in input–output production networks: An application to Brexit," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 840-870, April.
    17. Honghao Ren & Henk Folmer & Arno Vlist, 2014. "What role does the real estate–construction sector play in China’s regional economy?," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 52(3), pages 839-857, May.
    18. André Torre, 1993. "Sur la signification théorique du modèle d'offre multisectoriel," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 44(5), pages 951-970.
    19. André de Montigny & André Martens, 1979. "Planification macroéconomique du développement et coûts d'opération et d'entretien des projets de l'Etat : un essai de simulation," Revue Économique, Programme National Persée, vol. 30(2), pages 281-319.
    20. Bhattacharya, Tulika & Rajeev, Meenakshi, 2014. "Identifying the high linked sectors for India: An application of import adjusted domestic input-output matrix," Working Papers 329, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:rre:publsh:v20:y:1990:i:2:p:60-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tammy Leonard & Lei Zhang (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.srsa.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.