IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/222523.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Horizontale und vertikale Adäquanz im Anschluss an die betriebliche Ausbildung in Deutschland. Zur Bedeutung von Merkmalen des Ausbildungsberufs
[Horizontal and vertical matches after apprenticeship training in Germany. On the impact of characteristics of the training occupation]

Author

Listed:
  • Menze, Laura

Abstract

Absolventen des dualen Systems der Berufsausbildung in Deutschland haben unterschiedlich gute Chancen auf einen direkten Übergang in horizontal und vertikal adäquate Arbeitsmarktpositionen. Der Artikel diskutiert die Rolle von strukturellen Merkmalen von Ausbildungsberufen für diese unterschiedlichen Chancen. Der Fokus liegt auf drei Merkmalen: die durchschnittlichen Ausbildungskosten, der Grad der beruflichen Schließung und die Breite der Qualifikationen. Anhand von Daten des Nationalen Bildungspanels (NEPS) wird die erste Arbeitsmarktposition von betrieblich Ausgebildeten der Abschlussjahrgänge 1974 bis 2004 in Westdeutschland untersucht. Indikatoren für die beruflichen Merkmale werden mit Daten der BIBB-Kosten-Nutzen-Erhebungen und der BIBB/IAB-Erwerbstätigenbefragungen gebildet und den Individualdaten zugespielt. Mithilfe von multinomialen logistischen Regressionsmodellen wird der Einfluss der Berufsmerkmale auf die Wahrscheinlichkeit untersucht, überhaupt eine Erwerbstätigkeit zu finden sowie horizontal und vertikal adäquate Positionen zu erreichen. Es zeigt sich, dass die betrachteten Merkmale des Ausbildungsberufs für betrieblich Ausgebildete unterschiedliche Optionen sowohl innerhalb des erlernten Berufs als auch in anderen Berufen eröffnen. Der Artikel leistet einen Beitrag zu unserem Verständnis dafür, wie berufliche Merkmale individuelle Arbeitsmarktchancen strukturieren und zeigt langfristige Konsequenzen von ungleichen Zugangschancen zu Ausbildungsberufen auf.

Suggested Citation

  • Menze, Laura, 2017. "Horizontale und vertikale Adäquanz im Anschluss an die betriebliche Ausbildung in Deutschland. Zur Bedeutung von Merkmalen des Ausbildungsberufs [Horizontal and vertical matches after apprenticeshi," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 69(1), pages 79-107.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:222523
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/222523/1/Full-text-article-Menze-Horizontale-und-vertikale.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Regula Geel & Johannes Mure & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2011. "Specificity of occupational training and occupational mobility: an empirical study based on Lazear’s skill-weights approach," Education Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(5), pages 519-535, January.
    2. Daron Acemoglu & Jörn-Steffen Pischke, 1998. "Why Do Firms Train? Theory and Evidence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(1), pages 79-119.
    3. Jens Mohrenweiser & Uschi Backes‐Gellner, 2010. "Apprenticeship training: for investment or substitution?," International Journal of Manpower, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 545-562, August.
    4. Blossfeld, Hans-Peter, 1985. "Berufseintritt und Berufsverlauf : eine Kohortenanalyse über die Bedeutung des ersten Berufs in der Erwerbsbiographie," Mitteilungen aus der Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), Nürnberg [Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany], vol. 18(2), pages 177-197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludwig-Mayerhofer, Wolfgang & Pollak, Reinhard & Solga, Heike & Menze, Laura & Leuze, Kathrin & Edelstein, Rosine & Künster, Ralf & Ebralidze, Ellen & Fehring, Gritt & Kühn, Susanne, 2019. "Vocational Education and Training and Transitions into the Labor Market," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3, pages 277-323.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. By Barbara Mueller & Jürg Schweri, 2015. "How specific is apprenticeship training? Evidence from inter-firm and occupational mobility after graduation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1057-1077.
    2. Mohrenweiser, Jens, 2016. "Recruitment and apprenticeship training," Industrielle Beziehungen - Zeitschrift fuer Arbeit, Organisation und Management - The German Journal of Industrial Relations, Rainer Hampp Verlag, vol. 23(1), pages 6-24.
    3. Harald Pfeifer & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2017. "Another piece of the puzzle: Firms' investment in training as optimization of skills inventory," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0136, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW), revised Jun 2018.
    4. Felix Wenzelmann, 2012. "Ausbildungsmotive und die Zeitaufteilung der Auszubildenden im Betrieb [Training motives and the allocation of productive tasks in apprenticeship training in Germany]," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 45(2), pages 125-145, July.
    5. Kathrin Göggel & Thomas Zwick, 2012. "Heterogeneous Wage Effects of Apprenticeship Training," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 114(3), pages 756-779, September.
    6. Miriam Rinawi & Uschi Backes-Gellner, 2020. "Firms’ method of pay and the retention of apprentices," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 72(1), pages 269-291.
    7. Jäger, Simon & Heining, Jörg, 2019. "How Substitutable Are Workers? Evidence from Worker Deaths," MPRA Paper 109757, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 Jan 2019.
    8. Thomsen, Stephan L. & Trunzer, Johannes, 2020. "Did the Bologna Process Challenge the German Apprenticeship System? Evidence from a Natural Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 13806, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Edward P. Lazear, 2009. "Firm-Specific Human Capital: A Skill-Weights Approach," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 117(5), pages 914-940, October.
    10. Felix Wenzelmann, 2012. "Ausbildungsmotive und die Zeitaufteilung der Auszubildenden im Betrieb," Journal for Labour Market Research, Springer;Institute for Employment Research/ Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB), vol. 45(2), pages 125-145, July.
    11. Jens Mohrenweiser & Thomas Zwick & Uschi Backes‐Gellner, 2019. "Poaching and Firm‐Sponsored Training," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 57(1), pages 143-181, March.
    12. Zwick Thomas & Mohrenweiser Jens, 2015. "Youth Unemployment After Apprenticeship Training and Individual, Occupation, and Training Employer Characteristics," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 235(4-5), pages 418-432, August.
    13. Sofie Cabus & Eszter Nagy, 2021. "On the productivity effects of training apprentices in Hungary: evidence from a unique matched employer–employee dataset," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 60(4), pages 1685-1718, April.
    14. Jansen, A., 2016. "Is investing in apprentices related to decision-makers’ altruism and their high time preference?," Research Memorandum 010, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    15. Uschi Backes-Gellner & Patrick Lehnert, 2022. "Apprenticeships," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0194, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    16. Goeggel, Kathrin & Zwick, Thomas, 2009. "Good occupation - bad occupation? The quality of apprenticeship training," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-024, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    17. Jansen, A., 2016. "Is investing in apprentices related to decision-makers' altruism and their high time preference?," ROA Research Memorandum 002, Maastricht University, Research Centre for Education and the Labour Market (ROA).
    18. Moretti, Luca & Mayerl, Martin & Mühlemann, Samuel & Schlögl, Peter & Wolter, Stefan C., 2017. "So Similar and Yet So Different: A Comparative Analysis of a Firm's Cost and Benefits of Apprenticeship Training in Austria and Switzerland," IZA Discussion Papers 11081, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:10:y:2004:i:8:p:1-8 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Ardiana N. Gashi & Geoff Pugh & Nick Adnett, 2008. "Technological change and employer-provided training: Evidence from German establishments," Economics of Education Working Paper Series 0026, University of Zurich, Department of Business Administration (IBW).
    21. Bhaskar, V & Holden, Steinar, 2002. "Wage Differentiation via Subsidised General Training," Economics Discussion Papers 8851, University of Essex, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:222523. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.