IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zag/busexc/v18y2024i1p11-34.html

Millennials Changing The Game: The New Generations Challenging The Workplace

Author

Listed:
  • Aleksandra Janeska-Iliev

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics - Skopje)

  • Bojan Kitanovikj

    (Ss. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje, Faculty of Economics - Skopje)

Abstract

Purpose: With a substantial presence of Generation Y members in the workforce and a growing number of Generation Z employees, managers are increasingly confronted with the challenge of navigating intergenerational differences among employees. In this research endeavour, the authors sought to explore the anticipated impacts of the emerging generation on work dynamics. Specifically, the objective is to discern potential disparities among generational cohorts concerning their attitudes toward work centrality and how these disparities might influence work engagement, with a particular emphasis on Generation Z. Methodology: The research endeavour was based on data from 204 participants spanning various generational cohorts aged between 19 and 48 years. The survey gathered data on the respondents’ demographic, work centrality, and work-related aspects and well-being. A Spearman’s rank-order correlation and a t-test were used for data analysis in SPSS. Findings and implications: The findings revealed a significant correlation between age and work engagement, as well as between work centrality and work engagement, suggesting nuanced relationships within the diverse age groups in the workforce. Limitations: The study mostly concentrated on the research context of the Republic of North Macedonia, leaving space for cross-regional and cross-country studies. Originality: As the workforce becomes increasingly diverse in terms of age, newer generations are instigating a transformation in workplace values, consequently shaping a novel professional environment. This leads to a growing interest in academic and practitioner circles. Yet, after an extensive search query in the Scopus database, it was found that there were very few articles detailing the differences in work centrality and work engagement levels among different age groups. So, this study will attempt to fill this gap.

Suggested Citation

  • Aleksandra Janeska-Iliev & Bojan Kitanovikj, 2024. "Millennials Changing The Game: The New Generations Challenging The Workplace," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 18(1), pages 11-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:11-34
    DOI: 10.22598/pi-be/2024.18.1.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/459874
    Download Restriction: None

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22598/pi-be/2024.18.1.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Minha Younas & Muhammad Waseem Bari, 2020. "The relationship between talent management practices and retention of generation ‘Y’ employees: mediating role of competency development," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(1), pages 1330-1353, January.
    2. Francesco Della Puppa, 2023. "Decline of the Centrality of Work? Critique of a Contemporary Ideology," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(1), pages 306-311, February.
    3. Sanman Hu & Lixin Jiang & Tahira M Probst & Mingqian Liu, 2021. "The relationship between qualitative job insecurity and subjective well-being in Chinese employees: The role of work–family conflict and work centrality," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 42(2), pages 203-225, May.
    4. Daniels, Kevin & Watson, David & Nayani, Rachel & Tregaskis, Olga & Hogg, Martin & Etuknwa, Abasiama & Semkina, Antonina, 2021. "Implementing practices focused on workplace health and psychological wellbeing: A systematic review," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    5. Babalola Oluwayemi Oginni & Olusegun Abel Adesanya & Gbenga Ezekiel Ilori & Isola Olalekan Ayantunji & Folakemi Olubunmi Lanre-Babalola & Kolawole Sunday Ajibola, 2023. "Occupational Stress And Industrial Relations Outcomes: Evidence From Selected Manufacturing Organizations In Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 17(2), pages 12-33.
    6. Szymkowiak, Andrzej & Melović, Boban & Dabić, Marina & Jeganathan, Kishokanth & Kundi, Gagandeep Singh, 2021. "Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    7. Max Haller & Beate Klösch & Markus Hadler, 2023. "The Centrality of Work: A Comparative Analysis of Work Commitment and Work Orientation in Present-Day Societies," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    8. Rok Črešnar & Zlatko Nedelko, 2020. "Understanding Future Leaders: How Are Personal Values of Generations Y and Z Tailored to Leadership in Industry 4.0?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Danica Bakotić & Antonia Vulić, 2022. "Human Resource Management And Labour Market Challenges: The Evidence From Large Croatian Service Industry Companies," Poslovna izvrsnost-Business Excellence, University of Zagreb Faculty of Economics & Business, vol. 16(2), pages 11-51.
    10. Pichler, Shaun & Kohli, Chiranjeev & Granitz, Neil, 2021. "DITTO for Gen Z: A framework for leveraging the uniqueness of the new generation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 64(5), pages 599-610.
    11. Volery, Thierry & Tarabashkina, Liudmila, 2021. "The impact of organisational support, employee creativity and work centrality on innovative work behaviour," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 295-303.
    12. Dorota Grego-Planer, 2019. "The Relationship between Organizational Commitment and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors in the Public and Private Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-20, November.
    13. Bernhard Kittel & Fabian Kalleitner & Panos Tsakloglou, 2019. "The Transmission of Work Centrality within the Family in a Cross-Regional Perspective," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 682(1), pages 106-124, March.
    14. McKercher, Bob, 2023. "Age or generation? Understanding behaviour differences," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    15. Urmila Itam & Nitu Ghosh, 2020. "Employee Experience Management: A New Paradigm Shift in HR Thinking," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 11(2), pages 39-49, April.
    16. Gábor Hajdu & Endre Sik, 2018. "Age, Period, and Cohort Differences in Work Centrality and Work Values," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-33, February.
    17. Rabindra Kumar Pradhan & Lopamudra Hati, 2022. "The Measurement of Employee Well-being: Development and Validation of a Scale," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 385-407, April.
    18. Liu, Yiran & Li, Yong & Hao, Xiling & Zhang, Yuli, 2019. "Narcissism and learning from entrepreneurial failure," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 496-512.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tingko Lee & Chih-Hsing Liu & Bernard Gan & Cheng-Kuei Yang, 2025. "The double-edged sword of narcissism: influences of university students’ grandiose and vulnerable narcissism on entrepreneurial intention," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 333-369, March.
    2. Khan, Nawab Ali & Azhar, Mohd & Rahman, Mohd Nayyer & Akhtar, Mohd Junaid, 2022. "Scale development and validation for usage of social networking sites during COVID-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Muriel Davies & Michel Moulinet & Stéphanie Buisine, 2023. "Innovation culture in French organisations," Post-Print hal-04085432, HAL.
    4. Loan Thi-Hong Van & Le Dang Lang & Trong Liem-Phuoc Ngo & João Ferreira, 2024. "The impact of internal social responsibility on service employees' job satisfaction and organizational engagement," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 18(1), pages 101-131, March.
    5. Xiangming (Tommy) Tao & Catherine L. Wang & Paul J. A. Robson & Mathew (Mat) Hughes, 2025. "How does team learning from failure facilitate new product performance? The double-edged moderating effect of collective efficacy," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(1), pages 133-155, January.
    6. Fang, Lan & Quan, Yurong & Mao, Hui & Chen, Shaojian, 2022. "The Information Communication Technology and Off-farm Employment of Rural Laborers: An Analysis Based on the Micro Data of China Family Panel Studies," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322088, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Xiaoxia Huang & Yuyin Liu & Jing Zhao, 2024. "The Impacts of Work-Family Conflict and Corporate Innovation on Organizational Performance," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    8. Zhuoyao Cui & Haochen Yang, 2023. "From Game Elements to Active Learning Intentions: Exploring the Driving Factors in Digital Learning Platforms," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    9. Chee-Seng Tan & Jonathan E. Ramsay & Sanju George & Argel Bondoc Masanda & Soon-Aun Tan & Jing Zhang & Siew-May Cheng & Mark A. Runco & Walton Wider, 2025. "Give me Support and Hope, and I Can Be Creative: Evidence for a Mediation Model from Five Countries," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 20(4), pages 1469-1491, August.
    10. Li Xiong, 2022. "Improvise to win: the relationship between entrepreneurial improvisation and start-up competitive advantage," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(2), pages 184-204, April.
    11. Widodo & Chandrawaty, 2021. "Exploring The Principals' Visionary Leaderships' Effect on School Organizational Culture and Teachers' Affective Commitment," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 18(1), pages 21-30, April.
    12. Galina Shirokova & Nailya Galieva & Joshua V. White & Diana Doktorova, 2024. "Narcissism, workaholism, family support and new venture performance: a moderated mediation model," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(1), pages 379-419, June.
    13. Mitja Vrdelja & Sanja Vrbovšek & Vito Klopčič & Kevin Dadaczynski & Orkan Okan, 2021. "Facing the Growing COVID-19 Infodemic: Digital Health Literacy and Information-Seeking Behaviour of University Students in Slovenia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.
    14. Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Adomako, Samuel & Berko, Damoah Obi, 2022. "Once bitten, twice shy? The relationship between business failure experience and entrepreneurial collaboration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 983-992.
    15. Angel Deroncele-Acosta & Roger Pedro Norabuena-Figueroa & Rosendo López Mustelier & Eldis Román-Cao & Pedro Sotomayor-Soloaga, 2025. "Employee Well-Being Scale for Teachers in Latin America (EWBTS-LATAM)," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    16. Xiaoping Chen & Hongming Xie & Huanhuai Zhou, 2024. "Incremental versus Radical Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Anna Kwiotkowska & Radosław Wolniak & Bożena Gajdzik & Magdalena Gębczyńska, 2022. "Configurational Paths of Leadership Competency Shortages and 4.0 Leadership Effectiveness: An fs/QCA Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, February.
    18. José Alberto Martínez-González & Eduardo Parra-López & Almudena Barrientos-Báez, 2021. "Young Consumers’ Intention to Participate in the Sharing Economy: An Integrated Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. repec:bcp:journl:v:8:y:2024:i:9:p:3622-3631 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Rob Kim Marjerison & Matthew Andrews & George Kuan, 2022. "Creating Sustainable Organizations through Knowledge Sharing and Organizational Agility: Empirical Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    21. Kalina Grzesiuk & Dorota Jegorow & Monika Wawer & Anna Głowacz, 2023. "Energy-Efficient City Transportation Solutions in the Context of Energy-Conserving and Mobility Behaviours of Generation Z," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-28, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zag:busexc:v:18:y:2024:i:1:p:11-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dario Dunković (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fefzghr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.