IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/riskan/v40y2020i5p926-938.html

Work Conditions, Social Incorporations, and Foodborne Diseases Risk: Reflections About the (Non)Compliance of Food Safety Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Rayane Stephanie Gomes de Freitas
  • Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha
  • Elke Stedefeldt

Abstract

The number of foodborne diseases has increased in all continents, and efforts must be made to control this urgent and expressive public health problem. This article aims to present and discuss situations related to the compliance and noncompliance of food safety practices (FSPs) in light of Bourdieu's social theory. This qualitative study was conducted in commercial restaurants in two cities in São Paulo, Brazil. Participant observation was used in the restaurants, and notes referring to the kitchen workers and their bosses’ work processes were registered in field journals. Thematic type content analysis was used to determine the meaning cores of field journals. It was found that aspects inherent to convenience and haste at work, deficient infrastructure, lack of employees, negative boss examples, exposure to noise, and body pain experienced by workers can contribute to noncompliance of FSPs and consolidate in the habitus and practical sense some dispositions that can increase the risk of foodborne diseases. This study highlights the necessity of creating environments that address food safety, which means being able to perform a service properly.

Suggested Citation

  • Rayane Stephanie Gomes de Freitas & Diogo Thimoteo da Cunha & Elke Stedefeldt, 2020. "Work Conditions, Social Incorporations, and Foodborne Diseases Risk: Reflections About the (Non)Compliance of Food Safety Practices," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(5), pages 926-938, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:5:p:926-938
    DOI: 10.1111/risa.13453
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13453
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/risa.13453?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carlijn B M Kamphuis & Tessa Jansen & Johan P Mackenbach & Frank J van Lenthe, 2015. "Bourdieu’s Cultural Capital in Relation to Food Choices: A Systematic Review of Cultural Capital Indicators and an Empirical Proof of Concept," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Alexandre Mas & Enrico Moretti, 2009. "Peers at Work," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 99(1), pages 112-145, March.
    3. Musolino, Connie & Warin, Megan & Wade, Tracey & Gilchrist, Peter, 2015. "‘Healthy anorexia’: The complexity of care in disordered eating," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 18-25.
    4. Rempel, D. & Evanoff, B. & Amadio, P.C. & De Krom, M. & Franklin, G. & Franzblau, A. & Gray, R. & Gerr, F. & Hagberg, M. & Hales, T. & Katz, J.N. & Pransky, G., 1998. "Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 88(10), pages 1447-1451.
    5. Xiang Qian Lao & Ignatius Tak Sun Yu & Dennis Kin Kwok Au & Yuk Lan Chiu & Claudie Chiu Yi Wong & Tze Wai Wong, 2013. "Noise Exposure and Hearing Impairment among Chinese Restaurant Workers and Entertainment Employees in Hong Kong," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-9, August.
    6. Julia Woodhall-Melnik & Flora I Matheson, 2017. "More than convenience: the role of habitus in understanding the food choices of fast food workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 31(5), pages 800-815, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amrei Lahno & Marta Serra-Garcia, 2015. "Peer effects in risk taking: Envy or conformity?," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 73-95, February.
    2. Suraj Das, 2024. "Women's experiences and sustainable adaptation: a socio-ecological study of climate change in the Himalayas," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 177(4), pages 1-25, April.
    3. ,, 2009. "Monopolistic group design with peer effects," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 4(1), March.
    4. Benjamin Balsmeier & Bernd Frick & Michael Hickfang, 2019. "The impact of skilled immigrants on their local teammates’ performance," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 97-103, January.
    5. Bet Caeyers, 2014. "Peer effects in development programme awareness of vulnerable groups in rural Tanzania," CSAE Working Paper Series 2014-11, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    6. Jones, Todd R. & Kofoed, Michael S., 2020. "Do peers influence occupational preferences? Evidence from randomly-assigned peer groups at West Point," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Emek Basker, 2012. "Raising the Barcode Scanner: Technology and Productivity in the Retail Sector," NBER Chapters, in: Standards, Patents and Innovations, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Graff, Frederik & Grund, Christian & Harbring, Christine, 2021. "Competing on the Holodeck - The effect of virtual peers and heterogeneity in dynamic tournaments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    9. Patricia Funk, 2012. "How accurate are surveyed preferences for public policies? Evidence from a unique institutional setup," Economics Working Papers 1334, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Nov 2013.
    10. Stefan, Matthias & Huber, Jürgen & Kirchler, Michael & Sutter, Matthias & Walzl, Markus, 2023. "Monetary and social incentives in multi-tasking: The ranking substitution effect," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    11. Hope, Ole-Kristian & Su, Xijiang, 2021. "Peer-level analyst transitions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    12. Silvia Sacchetti & Ermanno Tortia, 2012. "The internal and external governance of cooperatives: the effective membership and consistency of value," AICCON Working Papers 111-2012, Associazione Italiana per la Cultura della Cooperazione e del Non Profit.
    13. Mirko Kremer & Francis de Véricourt, 2022. "Mismanaging diagnostic accuracy under congestion," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-22-01, ESMT European School of Management and Technology.
    14. Brülisauer, Marcel & Goette, Lorenz & Jiang, Zhengyi & Schmitz, Jan & Schubert, Renate, 2020. "Appliance-specific feedback and social comparisons: Evidence from a field experiment on energy conservation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    15. Decataldo, Alessandra & Fiore, Brunella, 2018. "Is eating in the school canteen better to fight overweight? A sociological observational study on nutrition in Italian children," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 246-256.
    16. Chang, Tom & Gross, Tal, 2014. "How many pears would a pear packer pack if a pear packer could pack pears at quasi-exogenously varying piece rates?," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-17.
    17. Marco Alfano & Ross McKenzie & Graeme Roy, 2020. "The cross-occupational effects of immigration on native wages in the UK," Working Papers 2011, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    18. Chesney, Alexander J., 2022. "Should I get a master’s degree?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Agnes Baeker & Mario Mechtel, 2013. "The Role of Task Meaning on Output in Groups: Experimental Evidence," IAAEU Discussion Papers 201308, Institute of Labour Law and Industrial Relations in the European Union (IAAEU).
    20. Jia Li & Noah Lim & Hua Chen, 2020. "Examining Salesperson Effort Allocation in Teams: A Randomized Field Experiment," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(6), pages 1122-1141, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:riskan:v:40:y:2020:i:5:p:926-938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1539-6924 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.