IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jpamgt/v44y2025i2p403-427.html

Police reform from the top down: Experimental evidence on police executive support for civilian oversight

Author

Listed:
  • Ian T. Adams
  • Joshua McCrain
  • Daniel S. Schiff
  • Kaylyn Jackson Schiff
  • Scott M. Mourtgos

Abstract

The accountability of police to the public is imperative for a functioning democracy. The opinions of police executives—pivotal actors for implementing oversight policies—are an understudied, critical component of successful reform efforts. We use a pre‐registered survey experiment administered to all U.S. municipal police chiefs and county sheriffs to assess whether police executives’ attitudes towards civilian oversight are responsive to 1) state‐level public opinion (drawing on an original n = 16,840 survey) and 2) prior adoption of civilian review boards in large agencies. Results from over 1,300 police executives reveal that law enforcement leaders are responsive to elite peer adoption but much less to public opinion, despite overwhelming public support. Compared to appointed municipal police chiefs, elected sheriffs are less likely to support any civilian oversight. Our findings hold implications for reformers: we find that existing civilian oversight regimes are largely popular, and that it is possible to move police executive opinion towards support for civilian oversight.

Suggested Citation

  • Ian T. Adams & Joshua McCrain & Daniel S. Schiff & Kaylyn Jackson Schiff & Scott M. Mourtgos, 2025. "Police reform from the top down: Experimental evidence on police executive support for civilian oversight," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 403-427, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:44:y:2025:i:2:p:403-427
    DOI: 10.1002/pam.22620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.22620
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pam.22620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William G. Doerner & William M. Doerner, 2008. "The Diffusion of Accreditation Among Florida Police Agencies," Working Papers wp2008_10_01, Department of Economics, Florida State University, revised Apr 2009.
    2. Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2019. "Causal peer effects in police misconduct," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 797-807, August.
    3. Shipan, Charles R. & Volden, Craig, 2014. "When the smoke clears: expertise, learning and policy diffusion," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 357-387, December.
    4. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    5. Knox, Dean & Lowe, Will & Mummolo, Jonathan, 2020. "Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing—CORRIGENDUM," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(4), pages 1394-1394, November.
    6. Thompson, Daniel M., 2020. "How Partisan Is Local Law Enforcement? Evidence from Sheriff Cooperation with Immigration Authorities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(1), pages 222-236, February.
    7. Peter K. Enns, 2014. "The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 857-872, October.
    8. Canes-Wrone, Brandice & Clark, Tom S. & Kelly, Jason P., 2014. "Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(1), pages 23-39, February.
    9. Knox, Dean & Lowe, Will & Mummolo, Jonathan, 2020. "Administrative Records Mask Racially Biased Policing," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(3), pages 619-637, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:osf:socarx:mdu96_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Adams, Ian T. & McCrain, Joshua & Schiff, Daniel S. & Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson & Mourtgos, Scott M., 2022. "Public Pressure or Peer Influence: What Shapes Police Executives' Views on Civilian Oversight?," SocArXiv mdu96, Center for Open Science.
    3. Lieberman, Carl, 2024. "Variation in racial disparities in police use of force," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Brendan O'Flaherty & Rajiv Sethi & Morgan Williams, 2024. "The nature, detection, and avoidance of harmful discrimination in criminal justice," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(1), pages 289-320, January.
    5. Annan-Phan, Sébastien & Ba, Bocar A., 2024. "JUE Insight: Hot temperatures, aggression, and death at the hands of the police: Evidence from the U.S," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Palina Prysmakova, 2020. "Generation learning framework: Applying Margaret Mead's typology to agenda-setting stage of policy diffusion," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25.
    7. Gian Maria Campedelli, 2022. "Explainable Machine Learning for Predicting Homicide Clearance in the United States," Papers 2203.04768, arXiv.org.
    8. Anuli Njoku & Marcelin Joseph & Rochelle Felix, 2021. "Changing the Narrative: Structural Barriers and Racial and Ethnic Inequities in COVID-19 Vaccination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    9. Aliprantis, Dionissi & Martin, Hal & Tauber, Kristen, 2024. "What determines the success of housing mobility programs?," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    10. Pradhi Aggarwal & Alec Brandon & Ariel Goldszmidt & Justin Holz & John List & Ian Muir & Gregory Sun & Thomas Yu, 2022. "High-frequency location data shows that race affects the likelihood of being stopped and fined for speeding," Natural Field Experiments 00764, The Field Experiments Website.
    11. Frank Edwards, 2025. "Bias, risk, racism: Reconciling critical and quantitative approaches to understanding racial inequality in child welfare system outcomes," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(2), pages 693-706, March.
    12. Riley, Taylor & Schleimer, Julia P. & Jahn, Jaquelyn L., 2024. "Organized abandonment under racial capitalism: Measuring accountable actors of structural racism for public health research and action," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 343(C).
    13. Schuessler, Julian, 2024. "Causal analysis with observational data," OSF Preprints wam94, Center for Open Science.
    14. Maximilian Kasy, 2024. "Algorithmic bias and racial inequality: a critical review," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 40(3), pages 530-546.
    15. Yohei Yamaguchi & Ken Yahagi, 2024. "Law enforcement and political misinformation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(1), pages 3-36, January.
    16. Pickett, Justin & Graham, Amanda & Nix, Justin & Cullen, Francis T., 2022. "Officer Diversity May Reduce Black Americans’ Fear of the Police," SocArXiv 7mrgp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    17. Desmond Ang & Panka Bencsik & Jesse Bruhn & Ellora Derenoncourt, 2021. "Police violence reduces civilian cooperation and engagement with law enforcement," Working Papers 2021-16, Princeton University. Economics Department..
    18. Alston, Mackenzie & Owens, Emily, 2025. "Does black and blue matter? An experimental investigation of race, perceptions of police, and legal compliance," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    19. Charles Crabtree & John B. Holbein & J. Quin Monson, 2022. "Patient traits shape health-care stakeholders’ choices on how to best allocate life-saving care," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 244-257, February.
    20. Campedelli, Gian Maria, 2022. "Explainable machine learning for predicting homicide clearance in the United States," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    21. repec:osf:osfxxx:wam94_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Anna Bindler & Randi Hjalmarsson & Stephen Machin & Melissa Rubio-Ramos, 2026. "Disparate Treatment of the Irish in 19th Century English Courtrooms," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2152, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jpamgt:v:44:y:2025:i:2:p:403-427. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/34787/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.