IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/osf/socarx/mdu96.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Public Pressure or Peer Influence: What Shapes Police Executives' Views on Civilian Oversight?

Author

Listed:
  • Adams, Ian T.

    (University of South Carolina)

  • McCrain, Joshua
  • Schiff, Daniel S.

    (Purdue University)

  • Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson

    (Emory University)

  • Mourtgos, Scott M.

Abstract

Demand for democratic accountability in policing is accelerating, yet little is understood about how law enforcement executives engage in policy learning around civilian oversight. This paper shares the results of a novel survey experiment administered to all U.S. police chiefs and sheriffs. We assess whether police executives’ attitudes towards civilian oversight are responsive to 1) state-level public opinion (drawing on an n=16,840 survey) and 2) prior adoption of civilian review boards in large agencies. Results from over 1,300 police executives reveal that law enforcement leaders are responsive to peer adoption but much less to public opinion, despite overwhelming support amongst voters. Further, we find that agencies with an established oversight board are highly supportive of their existence, while elected sheriffs are much less likely to support civilian oversight. Our results indicate that policy learning and reform around civilian oversight are possible, though sources of reform are not themselves primarily democratic.

Suggested Citation

  • Adams, Ian T. & McCrain, Joshua & Schiff, Daniel S. & Schiff, Kaylyn Jackson & Mourtgos, Scott M., 2022. "Public Pressure or Peer Influence: What Shapes Police Executives' Views on Civilian Oversight?," SocArXiv mdu96, Center for Open Science.
    • Handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mdu96
    DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/mdu96
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://osf.io/download/6319e6c609a8522635d9f5a6/
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.31219/osf.io/mdu96?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mourtgos, Scott M. & Adams, Ian T., 2019. "The rhetoric of de-policing: Evaluating open-ended survey responses from police officers with machine learning-based structural topic modeling," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2019. "Publisher Correction: Causal peer effects in police misconduct," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(7), pages 762-762, July.
    3. Shipan, Charles R. & Volden, Craig, 2014. "When the smoke clears: expertise, learning and policy diffusion," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 34(3), pages 357-387, December.
    4. Edika G. Quispe-Torreblanca & Neil Stewart, 2019. "Causal peer effects in police misconduct," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 3(8), pages 797-807, August.
    5. Taedong Lee & Susan Meene, 2012. "Who teaches and who learns? Policy learning through the C40 cities climate network," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(3), pages 199-220, September.
    6. Thompson, Daniel M., 2020. "How Partisan Is Local Law Enforcement? Evidence from Sheriff Cooperation with Immigration Authorities," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 114(1), pages 222-236, February.
    7. Peter K. Enns, 2014. "The Public's Increasing Punitiveness and Its Influence on Mass Incarceration in the United States," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 58(4), pages 857-872, October.
    8. Rose, Richard, 1991. "What is Lesson-Drawing?," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(1), pages 3-30, January.
    9. Canes-Wrone, Brandice & Clark, Tom S. & Kelly, Jason P., 2014. "Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 108(1), pages 23-39, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yohei Yamaguchi & Ken Yahagi, 2024. "Law enforcement and political misinformation," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 36(1), pages 3-36, January.
    2. Caner Bakır, 2017. "Policy learning and policy change: learning from research citations," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(4), pages 585-597, December.
    3. Cubitt, Timothy I.C. & Gaub, Janne E. & Holtfreter, Kristy, 2022. "Gender differences in serious police misconduct: A machine-learning analysis of the New York Police Department (NYPD)," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Prysmakova, Palina, 2020. "Generation learning framework: Applying Margaret Mead's typology to agenda-setting stage of policy diffusion," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Mr. Alex Segura-Ubiergo & Miss Taline Koranchelian & Mr. Carlos Mulas-Granados, 2008. "Reforming Government Subsidies in the New Member States of the European Union," IMF Working Papers 2008/165, International Monetary Fund.
    6. May-Britt Stumbaum, 2015. "The diffusion of norms in security-related fields: views from China, India and the EU," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 331-347, September.
    7. Vairo, Daniela & Haring, Anna Maria & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2006. "Policies supporting organic food and farming in the EU: assessment and development by stakeholders in 11 European countries," 98th Seminar, June 29-July 2, 2006, Chania, Crete, Greece 10109, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Francesco Drago & Roberto Galbiati & Francesco Sobbrio, 2020. "The Political Cost of Being Soft on Crime: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(6), pages 3305-3336.
    9. Parker, David, 2001. "Economic Regulation: A Preliminary Literature Review and Summary of Research Questions Arising," Centre on Regulation and Competition (CRC) Working papers 30616, University of Manchester, Institute for Development Policy and Management (IDPM).
    10. Ida Andersson & Laura James, 2018. "Altruism or entrepreneurialism? The co-evolution of green place branding and policy tourism in Växjö, Sweden," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(15), pages 3437-3453, November.
    11. Gabriela de Carvalho, 2022. "The World Bank and Healthcare Reforms: A Cross‐National Analysis of Policy Prescriptions in South America," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 5-18.
    12. Srinivas C. Parinandi, 2020. "Policy Inventing and Borrowing among State Legislatures," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 852-868, October.
    13. Gouvêa, Raphael & Girardi, Daniele, 2021. "Partisanship and local fiscal policy: Evidence from Brazilian cities," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Raul Lejano & Savita Shankar, 2013. "The contextualist turn and schematics of institutional fit: Theory and a case study from Southern India," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 46(1), pages 83-102, March.
    15. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5404 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Haring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2005. "Stakeholder Assessment of Agricultural Policies and Development of Policy Instruments: A Cross-country Synthesis of National Policy Workshops in 11 European Countries," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24654, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Cacace, Mirella & Ettelt, Stefanie & Mays, Nicholas & Nolte, Ellen, 2013. "Assessing quality in cross-country comparisons of health systems and policies: Towards a set of generic quality criteria," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(1), pages 156-162.
    18. Anders Blok & Robin Tschötschel, 2016. "World port cities as cosmopolitan risk community: Mapping urban climate policy experiments in Europe and East Asia," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 34(4), pages 717-736, June.
    19. Parsons, Kelly & Lang, Tim & Barling, David, 2021. "London’s food policy: Leveraging the policy sub-system, programme and plan," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. Marsden, Greg & Stead, Dominic, 2011. "Policy transfer and learning in the field of transport: A review of concepts and evidence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(3), pages 492-500, May.
    21. Francesco Drago & Roberto Galbiati & Francesco Sobbrio, 2020. "The Political Cost of Being Soft on Crime: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 18(6), pages 3305-3336.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:osf:socarx:mdu96. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: OSF (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://arabixiv.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.