IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v37y2025i6p1307-1323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Farmer Empowerment and Employment in Major Agriculture Sectors in Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Jinat Jahan Khan

Abstract

The agriculture sector employs about 40% of the total population in Bangladesh, and empowerment in this agriculture sector improves farm productivity, dietary diversity, household nutrition status and agricultural development. However, in the existing literature, farmer empowerment and its relevant indicators have not been explored much. Thus, this study aims to find out the determinants of empowerment in the agriculture index for both men and women, considering the trends of employment in major agriculture sectors, and examines how adequacy in different empowerment indicators differs due to relevant factors in both agriculture sectors in rural Bangladesh. Using the Bangladesh Integrated Household Survey (BIHS) 2018–19, it found that the overall farmer empowerment remained low, with only 17.36% of surveyed farmers being empowered. Younger farmers (15–29) were most likely to be in the crop sub‐sector, whereas middle‐aged farmers (30–49) dominated the livestock sub‐sector. Empowered farmers mostly had access to agricultural extension services and vocational training. Regression findings from Logit models indicate that women are more empowered in the livestock sub‐sector, while men are more empowered in the crop sub‐sector. Education, income, access to agricultural extension services and vocational training influence the overall empowerment and its domains notably. This study suggests strengthening agricultural extension services, increasing opportunities to acquire education and vocational training/education, and creating more opportunities to access credit and sell agricultural products easily that may make farmers, regardless of their gender, more empowered in these major agriculture sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinat Jahan Khan, 2025. "Determinants of Farmer Empowerment and Employment in Major Agriculture Sectors in Bangladesh," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1307-1323, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1307-1323
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.70005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70005
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.70005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kassie, Menale & Fisher, Monica & Muricho, Geoffrey & Diiro, Gracious, 2020. "Women’s empowerment boosts the gains in dietary diversity from agricultural technology adoption in rural Kenya," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    2. Esther Duflo, 2012. "Women Empowerment and Economic Development," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 50(4), pages 1051-1079, December.
    3. Davis, K. & Nkonya, E. & Kato, E. & Mekonnen, D.A. & Odendo, M. & Miiro, R. & Nkuba, J., 2012. "Impact of Farmer Field Schools on Agricultural Productivity and Poverty in East Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 40(2), pages 402-413.
    4. Murugani, Vongai Gillian & Thamaga-Chitja, Joyce Magoshi, 2019. "How does women's empowerment in agriculture affect household food security and dietary diversity? The case of rural irrigation schemes in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 58(3), June.
    5. Vongai Gillian Murugani & Joyce Magoshi Thamaga-Chitja, 2019. "How does women's empowerment in agriculture affect household food security and dietary diversity? The case of rural irrigation schemes in Limpopo Province, South Africa," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 308-323, July.
    6. Jock R. Anderson, 2004. "Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard Realities," The World Bank Research Observer, World Bank, vol. 19(1), pages 41-60.
    7. Stanley Sharaunga & Maxwell Mudhara, 2016. "Dimensions of Empowerment Influencing Women in KwaZulu-Natal to diversify away from agricultural-based livelihoods," Agrekon, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1-2), pages 103-132, June.
    8. Carmen Diana Deere & Cheryl Doss, 2006. "The Gender Asset Gap: What Do We Know And Why Does It Matter?," Feminist Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1-2), pages 1-50.
    9. repec:ags:ijag24:346856 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sharaunga, Stanley & Mudhara, Maxwell, 2016. "Dimensions of Empowerment Influencing Women in KwaZulu-Natal to diversify away from agricultural-based livelihoods," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 55(01-2), May.
    11. Ruth Alsop & Mette Bertelsen & Jeremy Holland, 2006. "Empowerment in Practice : From Analysis to Implementation," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 6980.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Wenjing & Zhang, Xiaoling & Zhang, Zhengfeng, 2019. "The role of land tenure security in promoting rural women’s empowerment: Empirical evidence from rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 280-289.
    2. Sylvester Ochieng Ogutu & Andrea Fongar & Theda Gödecke & Lisa Jäckering & Henry Mwololo & Michael Njuguna & Meike Wollni & Matin Qaim, 2020. "How to make farming and agricultural extension more nutrition-sensitive: evidence from a randomised controlled trial in Kenya [Agricultural extension: good intentions and hard realities]," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 47(1), pages 95-118.
    3. Céline Bessiere & Sibylle Gollac, 2021. "Capital," Post-Print halshs-03513446, HAL.
    4. Fletschner, Diana & Peterman, Amber & Santos, Florence & Savath, Vivien, 2014. "Land, assets, and livelihoods: Gendered analysis of evidence from Odisha State in India:," IFPRI discussion papers 1323, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Kondylis, Florence & Mueller, Valerie & Zhu, Jessica, 2017. "Seeing is believing? Evidence from an extension network experiment," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 1-20.
    6. Margherita Scarlato & Giorgio d'Agostino & Francesca Capparucci, 2016. "Evaluating CCTs from a Gender Perspective: The Impact of Chile Solidario on Women's Employment Prospect," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 177-197, March.
    7. Miki Dowsing & Sarah Cardey, 2020. "Smallholder Farmers’ Perspectives on Advisory Extension Services: A Case Study of the Gamo Communities of Southern Ethiopia," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-17, September.
    8. Wang, Qi & Xiong, Xiong & Yang, Zhuoyi & An, Yahui & Feng, Xu, 2024. "Attention of women's liberation and investor herding behavior," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 520-544.
    9. Qian Liu & Yongmu Jiang & Carl‐Johan Lagerkvist & Wei Huang, 2023. "Extension services and the technical efficiency of crop‐specific farms in China," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 436-459, March.
    10. repec:osf:socarx:dk4bc_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Collins, LaPorchia A., 2022. "Identifying Profiles of Empowerment: Does the Empowerment Mix Matter for Food Security?," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 322538, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    12. Grohmann, Antonia & Hübler, Olaf & Kouwenberg, Roy & Menkhoff, Lukas, 2021. "Financial literacy: Thai middle-class women do not lag behind," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    13. Promila Das, 2023. "Examination of Elements Influencing Mothers’ Dynamic Capacity and Versatility: A Household-level Analysis," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 17(1), pages 179-190, April.
    14. Martey, Edward & Etwire, Prince M. & Mockshell, Jonathan, 2021. "Climate-smart cowpea adoption and welfare effects of comprehensive agricultural training programs," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Mullally, Conner & Maffioli, Alessandro, 2014. "The Impact of Agricultural Extension for Improved Management Practices: An Evaluation of the Uruguayan Livestock Program," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 4776, Inter-American Development Bank.
    16. Els Lecoutere & Lan Chu, 2024. "Supporting women's empowerment by changing intra‐household decision‐making: A mixed‐methods analysis of a field experiment in rural south‐west Tanzania," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 42(3), May.
    17. Wei Yang & Le Wang, 2023. "Impact of farmer group participation on the adoption of sustainable farming practices—spatial analysis of New Zealand dairy farmers," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 701-717, September.
    18. Djuraeva, Mukhayyo & Bobojonov, Ihtiyor & Kuhn, Lena & Glauben, Thomas, 2023. "The impact of agricultural extension type and form on technical efficiency under transition: An empirical assessment of wheat production in Uzbekistan," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 203-221.
    19. Thomas Coen & Anthony D'Agostino & Naomi Dorsey & Arif Mamun & Hua Xie & Yating Ru & Ephraim Nkonya & Claudia Ringler, "undated". "Interim Report for Evaluation of the ENRM Project in Malawi," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 5faea006db4645dba4596c634, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. World Bank, 2015. "Women, Business and the Law 2016: Getting to Equal," Working Papers id:7449, eSocialSciences.
    21. Makate, Clifton & Makate, Marshall, 2019. "Interceding role of institutional extension services on the livelihood impacts of drought tolerant maize technology adoption in Zimbabwe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 126-133.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:6:p:1307-1323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.