IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jintdv/v37y2025i5p1116-1126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Armed Conflict and Livestock Species Choices in Northern Nigeria: Evidence From Panel Data Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Olusegun Fadare
  • Isaac Omorogbe

Abstract

This study examines how armed conflict influences livestock species choices among households in northern Nigeria, a region with livelihoods largely dependent on livestock keeping. Using household panel survey data with global georeferenced conflict data, this study observes significant trends in livestock ownership patterns from 2010 to 2016. Results from the fixed‐effects multinomial logit model show that higher conflict intensity, measured by fatalities, reduces the likelihood of owning larger livestock, especially cattle, but it increases ownership of smaller, more resilient livestock such as poultry, sheep and goats. This shift has implications for household income and nutrition. This study highlights the importance of policies that consider conflict and promote diversified livestock holdings as a sustainable livelihood strategy in conflict‐vulnerable regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Olusegun Fadare & Isaac Omorogbe, 2025. "Armed Conflict and Livestock Species Choices in Northern Nigeria: Evidence From Panel Data Analysis," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(5), pages 1116-1126, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:5:p:1116-1126
    DOI: 10.1002/jid.4008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.4008
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/jid.4008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jintdv:v:37:y:2025:i:5:p:1116-1126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/5102/home .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.