IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v7y1998i8p711-722.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

General practitioners' referral thresholds and choices of referral destination: an experimental study

Author

Listed:
  • Stephen C. Earwicker

    (General practitioner, Stapleford, Nottingham, UK)

  • David K. Whynes

    (Department of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK)

Abstract

General practitioners (GPs) exert a major impact on NHS resource use, both as providers of primary care and as referrers to secondary care. Referral rates are subject to wide variations, leading to the conjecture that certain GPs may have different 'referral thresholds' from those of others. In this paper, the authors describe an experiment designed both to test the referral threshold hypothesis and to illuminate the GP'rsquo;s decision process with respect to choice over referral destination. Nottinghamshire GPs were provided with hypothetical case histories and a list of possible referral destinations, specifying a range of consultants, their specialist interests, plus the expected waiting times and costs for both out-patient investigation and in-patient treatment. For each case, respondents were requested to indicate whether or not they would refer the patient, and to whom. Respondents were also asked to indicate the extent to which their choices of consultants generally were governed by the specialist interest, the waiting time and the cost information. The responses of the sample support the referral threshold conjecture, with specialist interests and waiting time appearing to be far more important than cost in influencing choice of referral destination. The possibilities of influencing GPs' referral behaviour are discussed, in the light of recent initiatives with respect to prescribing. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephen C. Earwicker & David K. Whynes, 1998. "General practitioners' referral thresholds and choices of referral destination: an experimental study," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(8), pages 711-722.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:8:p:711-722
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199812)7:8<711::AID-HEC377>3.0.CO;2-I
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Propper, Carol & Croxson, Bronwyn & Shearer, Arran, 2002. "Waiting times for hospital admissions: the impact of GP fundholding," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 227-252, March.
    2. Tor Iversen & Ching-to Ma, 2011. "Market conditions and general practitioners’ referrals," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 245-265, December.
    3. Hackl, Franz & Hummer, Michael & Pruckner, Gerald J., 2015. "Old boys’ network in general practitioners’ referral behavior?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 56-73.
    4. Trudy Owens & Nikos Evangelou & David Whynes, 2013. "Rationing and deprivation: disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 14(2), pages 315-321, April.
    5. Hanlon, Neil & Skedgel, Chris, 2006. "Cross-district utilization of general hospital care in Nova Scotia: Policy and service delivery implications for rural districts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 145-156, January.
    6. Nordyke, Robert J., 2002. "Determinants of PHC productivity and resource utilization: a comparison of public and private physicians in Macedonia," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 67-96, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:8:p:711-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing) or (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.