IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

General practitioners' referral thresholds and choices of referral destination: an experimental study

Listed author(s):
  • Stephen C. Earwicker

    (General practitioner, Stapleford, Nottingham, UK)

  • David K. Whynes

    (Department of Economics, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK)

Registered author(s):

    General practitioners (GPs) exert a major impact on NHS resource use, both as providers of primary care and as referrers to secondary care. Referral rates are subject to wide variations, leading to the conjecture that certain GPs may have different 'referral thresholds' from those of others. In this paper, the authors describe an experiment designed both to test the referral threshold hypothesis and to illuminate the GP'rsquo;s decision process with respect to choice over referral destination. Nottinghamshire GPs were provided with hypothetical case histories and a list of possible referral destinations, specifying a range of consultants, their specialist interests, plus the expected waiting times and costs for both out-patient investigation and in-patient treatment. For each case, respondents were requested to indicate whether or not they would refer the patient, and to whom. Respondents were also asked to indicate the extent to which their choices of consultants generally were governed by the specialist interest, the waiting time and the cost information. The responses of the sample support the referral threshold conjecture, with specialist interests and waiting time appearing to be far more important than cost in influencing choice of referral destination. The possibilities of influencing GPs' referral behaviour are discussed, in the light of recent initiatives with respect to prescribing. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Article provided by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. in its journal Health Economics.

    Volume (Year): 7 (1998)
    Issue (Month): 8 ()
    Pages: 711-722

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:8:p:711-722
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199812)7:8<711::AID-HEC377>3.0.CO;2-I
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:8:p:711-722. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing)

    or (Christopher F. Baum)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.