IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v48y2026i1p294-308.html

Quantitative Comparison of Ad‐Valorem Equivalents for Non‐Tariff Trade Measures: WTO Versus TRAINS

Author

Listed:
  • Sionegael Ikeme
  • Amanda M. Countryman
  • Dale T. Manning
  • Diane Charlton

Abstract

Non‐tariff measures (NTMs) play a growing role in trade policy. Economists quantify NTMs by calculating their Ad Valorem Equivalents (AVE), typically employing one of two global NTM datasets: TRAINS from UNCTAD or WTO notifications. While TRAINS data better measure NTMs, their limited coverage over countries and time is inadequate for many types of analyses, and thus researchers often resort to using WTO data, which is not as accurate as the TRAINS but has better coverage. We compare the two datasets to assess whether AVEs from WTO notifications align with those from TRAINS, given similar country and time coverage. We find significant AVE discrepancies between datasets, sometimes reversing signs, warranting caution when using WTO notifications in the absence of TRAINS data to construct NTMs.

Suggested Citation

  • Sionegael Ikeme & Amanda M. Countryman & Dale T. Manning & Diane Charlton, 2026. "Quantitative Comparison of Ad‐Valorem Equivalents for Non‐Tariff Trade Measures: WTO Versus TRAINS," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(1), pages 294-308, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:294-308
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.70039
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70039
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.70039?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:48:y:2026:i:1:p:294-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.