IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/apecpp/v46y2024i4p1506-1532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using machine‐learning methods in meta‐analyses: An empirical application on consumer acceptance of meat alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Jiayu Sun
  • Vincenzina Caputo
  • Hannah Taylor

Abstract

Meta‐analyses are widely used in various academic fields, including applied economics. However, the high labor intensity involved in paper searching and small sample sizes remain two dominant limiting factors. We conducted a meta‐analysis of studies on consumer preferences for plant‐based and lab‐grown meat alternatives using machine‐learning techniques at both the data collection and the data analysis phases. We demonstrated that machine learning reduces the workload in the manual title‐abstract screen phase by 69% accounting for 24% of total workload in data collection. We also found that machine learning improves out‐of‐sample of sample prediction accuracy by 48–78 percentage points when compared to econometric model. Notably, we showed that integrating machine learning can also improve the predictive performance of econometric methods, thereby improving their out‐of‐sample predictions. Our empirical findings further revealed that demand for meat alternatives is higher among younger consumers, especially when the products displayed benefit information.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiayu Sun & Vincenzina Caputo & Hannah Taylor, 2024. "Using machine‐learning methods in meta‐analyses: An empirical application on consumer acceptance of meat alternatives," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 46(4), pages 1506-1532, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:46:y:2024:i:4:p:1506-1532
    DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13446
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/aepp.13446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:apecpp:v:46:y:2024:i:4:p:1506-1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2040-5804 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.