IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/agribz/v17y2001i3p423-433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on measuring returns to nonprice export promotion

Author

Listed:
  • Henry W. Kinnucan

    (Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology,, Auburn University, 213 Comer Hall, Auburn, AL 36949-4201., E-mail: hkinnuca@acesag.auburn.edu)

  • Øystein Myrland

    (Department of Economics and Management, University of Tromsø,, 9037 Tromsø, Norway. E-mail: oysteinm@nfh.uit.no)

Abstract

For nonprice promotion to benefit producers, it must raise the farm price. This principle seems not to be widely appreciated. In particular, a formula commonly used to measure returns to export promotion does not reflect price enhancement and therefore is problematic. An additional problem is that marginal returns, the usual measure provided in the literature, are often confused with average returns. This article discusses these issues in some detail using as an example salmon promotion in France and Germany. Study results suggest that promotion elasticity-based measures of returns can be misleading, especially in instances where producers or consumers are sensitive to price. [JEL Classifications: L660, Q130, Q170]. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry W. Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2001. "A note on measuring returns to nonprice export promotion," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 17(3), pages 423-433.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:17:y:2001:i:3:p:423-433
    DOI: 10.1002/agr.1026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/agr.1026
    File Function: Link to full text; subscription required
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/agr.1026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce L. Gardner, 1975. "The Farm-Retail Price Spread in a Competitive Food Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 57(3), pages 399-409.
    2. Gary W. Williams, 1985. "Returns to US soybean export market development," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 1(3), pages 243-263.
    3. Timothy J. Richards & Pieter. Van Ispelen & Albert Kagan, 1997. "A Two-Stage Analysis of the Effectiveness of Promotion Programs for U.S. Apples," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(3), pages 825-837.
    4. Marc Nerlove & Frederick V. Waugh, 1961. "Advertising without Supply Control: Some Implications of a Study of the Advertising of Oranges," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 43(4_Part_I), pages 813-837.
    5. Henry W. Kinnucan & Yuliang Miao, 2000. "Distributional Impacts of Generic Advertising on Related Commodity Markets," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 82(3), pages 672-678.
    6. Halliburton, Karen & Henneberry, Shida Rastegari, 1995. "The Effectiveness Of U.S. Nonprice Promotion Of Almonds In The Pacific Rim," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, July.
    7. H. W. Kinnucan, 1996. "A Note On Measuring Returns To Generic Advertising In Interrelated Markets," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1‐4), pages 261-267, January.
    8. Hui-Shung Chang & Henry W. Kinnucan, 1991. "Economic effects of an advertising excise tax," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(2), pages 165-173.
    9. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Christian, Jason E., 1997. "A Method For Measuring Returns To Nonprice Export Promotion With Application To Almonds," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-13, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Freixanet, Joan, 2022. "Export promotion programs: A system-based systematic review and agenda for future research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(4).
    2. Williams, Gary W. & Capps Jr., Oral, 2020. "Generic promotion of Norwegian seafood exports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    3. Stéphan Marette & Jutta Roosen & Sandrine Blanchemanche, 2008. "Taxes and subsidies to change eating habits when information is not enough: an application to fish consumption," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 119-143, October.
    4. Henry W. Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2002. "The Relative Impact of the Norway‐EU Salmon Agreement: a Mid‐term Assessment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 195-219, July.
    5. Pimbucha Rusmevichientong & Harry M. Kaiser, 2009. "Measuring the effectiveness of U.S. rice export promotion programs," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 25(2), pages 215-230.
    6. Williams, Gary W. & Capps, Jr., Oral, 2022. "The apparent conflict of Norwegian pelagic fisheries management and Norwegian seafood council export promotion," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 25(3), February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Henry W. Kinnucan & Maria Thomas, 1997. "Optimal Media Allocation Decisions For Generic Advertisers," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1‐3), pages 425-441, January.
    2. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Christian, Jason E., 1997. "A Method For Measuring Returns To Nonprice Export Promotion With Application To Almonds," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1999. "Advertising Traded Goods," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(1), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Freebairn, John W. & Alston, Julian M., 2001. "Generic advertising without supply control: implications of funding mechanisms for advertising intensities in competitive industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(1), pages 1-29.
    5. Holloway, Garth J. & Peyton, L. James & Griffith, Garry R., 2000. "Was the Australian Meat and Live-stock Corporation's advertising efficient?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(1), pages 1-27.
    6. Capps, Oral, Jr. & Williams, Gary W., 2006. "The Economic Effectiveness of the Cotton Checkoff Program," Reports 90753, Texas A&M University, Agribusiness, Food, and Consumer Economics Research Center.
    7. Kinnucan, Henry W. & Myrland, Oystein, 2002. "Relationship Between Partial and Total Responses to Advertising with Application to U.S. Meats," Research Bulletins 122634, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    8. Onunkwo, Izuchukwu M. & Epperson, James E., 1999. "Export Demand For U.S. Pecans: Impacts Of U.S. Export Promotion," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21686, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    9. Henry W. Kinnucan & Øystein Myrland, 2002. "The Relative Impact of the Norway‐EU Salmon Agreement: a Mid‐term Assessment," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 195-219, July.
    10. Kinnucan, Henry W., 1997. "Middlemen behaviour and generic advertising rents in competitive interrelated industries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 41(2), pages 1-17.
    11. Cranfield, John A.L., 2002. "Optimal Advertising With Traded Raw And Final Goods: The Case Of Variable Proportions Technology," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Balagtas, Joseph Valdes & Kim, Sounghun, 2005. "Beggar-Thy-Self Advertising: A Multi-Market Model of Generic Promotion for Dairy Products," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19303, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    13. Richards, Timothy J. & Patterson, Paul M., 1998. "New Varieties and the Returns to Commodity Promotion: Washington Fuji Apples," Working Papers 28541, Arizona State University, Morrison School of Agribusiness and Resource Management.
    14. repec:ebl:ecbull:v:13:y:2007:i:3:p:1-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Onunkwo, Izuchukwu M. & Epperson, James E., 2000. "Export Demand For U.S. Walnuts: Impacts Of U.S. Export Promotion Programs," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 31(3), pages 1-7, November.
    16. Kinnucan, Henry W., 2003. "Optimal generic advertising in an imperfectly competitive food industry with variable proportions," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 143-158, October.
    17. Zhang, Mingxia & Sexton, Richard J., 2000. "Optimal Commodity Promotion In Imperfectly Competitive Markets," 2000 Annual meeting, July 30-August 2, Tampa, FL 21823, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Williams, Gary W. & Capps Jr., Oral, 2020. "Generic promotion of Norwegian seafood exports," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 23(3), August.
    19. Freixanet, Joan, 2022. "Export promotion programs: A system-based systematic review and agenda for future research," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 57(4).
    20. Cardon, James H. & Pope, Rulon D., 2003. "Agricultural Market Structure, Generic Advertising, and Welfare," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 28(2), pages 1-16, August.
    21. Crespi, John M. & Marette, Stephan, 2001. "Are Assessments For Generic Advertising Optimal If Products Are Differentiated?," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20762, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:agribz:v:17:y:2001:i:3:p:423-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6297 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.